Recall Numbers- NO -63.9% -5.8 million./ YES -36.1 %.-3.2 million
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Last edited Wed Sep 15, 2021, 11:39 AM - Edit history (3)
Source: N Y Times:
No..... 5.800,000..63.9%...Yes.... 3.200,000..36.1%
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/09/14/us/elections/results-california-recall.html
....Soundly...is....VERY SOUNDLY!!!......that shows them....
ALBliberal
(2,339 posts)awesomerwb1
(4,267 posts)Percentages add up to 127%
hedda_foil
(16,372 posts)Stuart G
(38,419 posts)chowder66
(9,067 posts)I'm grateful that we did.. but this was the easiest ballot in the history of ballots, the easiest process to vote (ballots mailed to everyone) plus drop boxes everywhere.
We did incredibly well in the 2020 election but that was for the Presidency. I really would like to see these numbers come way up.
oswaldactedalone
(3,490 posts)Ballots postmarked by the 14th are accepted through the 21st. Could be another million or more votes left to count.
chowder66
(9,067 posts)Thanks.
IronLionZion
(45,427 posts)Stuart G
(38,419 posts)patphil
(6,169 posts)Lieutenant Governor should take over if the Governor is recalled.
At least, everyone who voted "no" should also get to vote for a replacement. The "winner" would need to get 50% of the vote, or the top 2 would run off.
The bullshit way they did it could have put Elder in the Governor's mansion with less 20% of the total vote.
LiberalFighter
(50,888 posts)Lt Gov should name his replacement.
And it should be 30% of those voting in each county in the last election.
Only those that voted in the previous election can vote in recall election.
Omaha Steve
(99,582 posts)Title AND format don't fit LBN.