Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SouthBayDem

(32,018 posts)
Thu Oct 21, 2021, 04:14 PM Oct 2021

Fed to ban policymakers from owning individual stocks, restrict trading following controversy

Source: CNBC

Responding to a growing controversy over investing practices, the Federal Reserve announced Thursday a wide-ranging ban on officials owning individual stocks and bonds and limits on other activities as well.

The ban includes top policymakers such as those who sit on the Federal Open Market Committee, along with senior staff. Future investments will have to be confined to diversified assets such as mutual funds.

Fed officials can no longer have holdings in shares of particular companies, nor can they invest in individual bonds, hold agency securities or derivative contracts. The new rules replace existing regulations that, while somewhat restrictive, still allowed officials such as regional presidents to buy and sell stocks.

“These tough new rules raise the bar high in order to assure the public we serve that all of our senior officials maintain a single-minded focus on the public mission of the Federal Reserve,” Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in a statement.

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/21/fed-to-ban-policymakers-from-owning-individual-stocks-restrict-trading-following-controversy.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fed to ban policymakers from owning individual stocks, restrict trading following controversy (Original Post) SouthBayDem Oct 2021 OP
For a minute, I thought "policymakers" was referring to members of Congress. 70sEraVet Oct 2021 #1
metoo riversedge Oct 2021 #4
I think this is overkill bucolic_frolic Oct 2021 #2
How about SCOTUS? RainCaster Oct 2021 #3
Do you think the Federal Reserve should be able to issue orders to the SC ? MichMan Oct 2021 #5
SCOTUS had not followed any rules of their own RainCaster Oct 2021 #6

bucolic_frolic

(43,128 posts)
2. I think this is overkill
Thu Oct 21, 2021, 05:36 PM
Oct 2021

They live in the financial world, they could be active traders. Their trading activities should be scrutinized for conflicts of interest. Also, they should be able to put their assets or their trades in a blind trust - hire professionals to do their business while they serve on the Fed. Limiting these people to mutual funds - code word, mostly, for index funds - is ridiculous. Furthermore, there are ETFs to take bets on anything you want. Not clear if mutual funds include ETFs. There are diversified ETFs, there are targeted ETF investments.

RainCaster

(10,866 posts)
6. SCOTUS had not followed any rules of their own
Sat Oct 23, 2021, 09:25 PM
Oct 2021

So they need to have some rules before the world realizes how corrupt they have become.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Fed to ban policymakers f...