Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,524 posts)
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 03:53 PM Jan 2022

North Carolina voters dispute Cawthorn candidacy over Jan. 6

Source: Associated Press

GARY D. ROBERTSON,
Associated Press
Jan. 10, 2022
Updated: Jan. 10, 2022 1:25 p.m.

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A group of North Carolina voters told state officials on Monday they want U.S. Rep. Madison Cawthorn disqualified as a congressional candidate, citing his involvement in last January’s rally in Washington questioning the presidential election outcome before a Capitol riot later that day.

Cawthorn's office quickly condemned the candidacy challenge of the Republican, which was filed on behalf of 11 voters with the State Board of Elections, which oversees a process by which a candidate’s qualifications are scrutinized. The voters contend that Cawthorn, who formally filed as a candidate for the 13th District seat last month, can’t run because he fails to comply with an amendment in the U.S. Constitution ratified shortly after the Civil War.

The 1868 amendment says no one can serve in Congress “who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress . . . to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same.”

The written challenge says the events on Jan. 6, 2021 “amounted to an insurrection” and that Cawthorn’s speech at the rally supporting President Donald Trump, his other comments and information in published reports provide a “reasonable suspicion or belief” that he helped facilitate the insurrection and is thus disqualified.


Read more: https://www.chron.com/news/article/North-Carolina-voters-dispute-Cawthorn-candidacy-16763898.php

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
North Carolina voters dispute Cawthorn candidacy over Jan. 6 (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jan 2022 OP
We need more of this! BlueIdaho Jan 2022 #1
a lot more llashram Jan 2022 #3
Will it work?! burrowowl Jan 2022 #2
Long shot, but it needs to be done to de-legitimize insurrectionist Cawthorn. JohnQFunk Jan 2022 #5
Nope nt reACTIONary Jan 2022 #8
The 14th Amendment is law The Jungle 1 Jan 2022 #4
Has Cawthorn committed a crime? brooklynite Jan 2022 #7
A House hearing will do. Separation of powers precludes the need for judiciary involvement. Gore1FL Jan 2022 #11
The handful of voters are taking legal action NOW... brooklynite Jan 2022 #12
The House gets to make that determination. nt Gore1FL Jan 2022 #15
Separation of powers doesn't give the Congress the right to interpret the Constitution. brooklynite Jan 2022 #13
It gives them the right to choose their members. Gore1FL Jan 2022 #14
Have you heard the story about his mother... Mazeltov Cocktail Jan 2022 #6
Yeah fuck that guy! Initech Jan 2022 #9
Wow, Hell yes! BunnyMcGee Jan 2022 #10

BlueIdaho

(13,582 posts)
1. We need more of this!
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 04:26 PM
Jan 2022

It’s getting pretty obvious that republicans have given up on democracy and are fully endorsing a singular strongman dictatorship as the best way to get what they want. We must stop rewarding these insurrectionists when they clearly are anti-American unconstitutional fascists.

JohnQFunk

(409 posts)
5. Long shot, but it needs to be done to de-legitimize insurrectionist Cawthorn.
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 06:40 PM
Jan 2022

There is lots of other dirt on this corrupt little stooge. Throw EVERYTHING at him.

 

The Jungle 1

(4,552 posts)
4. The 14th Amendment is law
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 04:38 PM
Jan 2022

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

I thought repukes were the law and order party?
Note this part of the law: or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. Many of them are guilty!
Someone get the bag of feathers and the tar barrel. We got some folks to talk to.

brooklynite

(94,503 posts)
7. Has Cawthorn committed a crime?
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 07:08 PM
Jan 2022

Usually, we require a trial before asserting that for legal purposes.

A handful of voters claiming he has won't get a legal hearing.

Gore1FL

(21,128 posts)
11. A House hearing will do. Separation of powers precludes the need for judiciary involvement.
Tue Jan 11, 2022, 12:30 PM
Jan 2022

The "handful of voters" are a start not a conclusion.

brooklynite

(94,503 posts)
12. The handful of voters are taking legal action NOW...
Tue Jan 11, 2022, 12:40 PM
Jan 2022

...NOW there is no legal determination that a 14th Amendment violation has occurred.

Gore1FL

(21,128 posts)
14. It gives them the right to choose their members.
Tue Jan 11, 2022, 01:19 PM
Jan 2022

The other branches have no say other than their votes as private citizens. The House has full control.

Mazeltov Cocktail

(569 posts)
6. Have you heard the story about his mother...
Mon Jan 10, 2022, 07:01 PM
Jan 2022

She had bibles embedded in the drywall above the light switches in every room of the house...per The Hoarse Whisperer on twitter.

I'm reminded of Sissy Spacek's mother in "Carrie"...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»North Carolina voters dis...