Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,319 posts)
Thu May 12, 2022, 11:09 AM May 2022

Meatpackers hyped 'baseless' shortage to keep plants open despite covid risks: report

Source: Washington Post

BUSINESS

Meatpackers hyped ‘baseless’ shortage to keep plants open despite covid risks: report

A House panel alleges that industry players like Tyson Foods prepared a draft that became the basis for an executive order the Trump White House issued in April 2020

By Taylor Telford
Today at 10:43 a.m. EDT | Updated today at 10:43 a.m. EDT

The biggest players in the U.S. meat industry pressed “baseless” claims of beef and pork shortages early in the pandemic to persuade the Trump White House to keep processing plants running, disregarding the coronavirus risks that eventually killed at least 269 workers, according to a special House committee investigating the nation’s pandemic response.

In a report released Thursday, the committee alleges that Tyson Foods’s legal team prepared a draft with input from other companies that became the basis for an executive order to keep the plants open the Trump administration issued in April 2020, making it difficult for workers to stay home.

“Meatpacking companies knew the risk posed by the coronavirus to their workers and knew it wasn’t a risk that the country needed them to take,” according to the report by the select subcommittee on the coronavirus crisis. “They nonetheless lobbied aggressively — successfully enlisting USDA as a close collaborator in their efforts — to keep workers on the job in unsafe conditions, to ensure state and local health authorities were powerless to mandate otherwise, and to be protected against legal liability for the harms that would result.”

{snip}

By Taylor Telford
Taylor Telford is a reporter covering national and breaking news. Twitter https://twitter.com/taylormtelford

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/05/12/meatpackers-covid-deaths-trump-industry/

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Meatpackers hyped 'baseless' shortage to keep plants open despite covid risks: report (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves May 2022 OP
Can Pres. Biden make an e.o Marthe48 May 2022 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music May 2022 #2
I don't see this administration trying anything close to that. aocommunalpunch May 2022 #3
The dotard needed his hamberders Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2022 #4
So were they hiding the meat? Because it certainly wasn't on the shelves for awhile. oldsoftie May 2022 #5
They have huge refrigerated warehouses with freezers, etc BumRushDaShow May 2022 #9
"Just in time"; learned from the Japanese, hurt MANY businesses. Like autos. oldsoftie May 2022 #10
I agree BumRushDaShow May 2022 #11
Thank you for the story; I hadn't heard that. I hope they follow through. oldsoftie May 2022 #12
Human capital stock keithbvadu2 May 2022 #6
Wisconsin Supreme Court justice: Meatpackers aren't 'regular folks' keithbvadu2 May 2022 #7
I suspect that they also hyped it to manipulate the price of said meat cstanleytech May 2022 #8
There needs to be all sorts of investigations amcgrath May 2022 #13

Marthe48

(16,908 posts)
1. Can Pres. Biden make an e.o
Thu May 12, 2022, 11:23 AM
May 2022

about abortion rights that make federal, state and local authorities powerless to reverse Roe v. Wade? Or an e.o. to protect voting rights from same?

Response to Marthe48 (Reply #1)

aocommunalpunch

(4,233 posts)
3. I don't see this administration trying anything close to that.
Thu May 12, 2022, 11:48 AM
May 2022

They haven't shown any indication of willingness in that direction.

oldsoftie

(12,492 posts)
5. So were they hiding the meat? Because it certainly wasn't on the shelves for awhile.
Thu May 12, 2022, 12:25 PM
May 2022

Not a big meat eater, but I would look every time I went to the stores & for quite some time the stock was thin.

BumRushDaShow

(128,527 posts)
9. They have huge refrigerated warehouses with freezers, etc
Thu May 12, 2022, 05:56 PM
May 2022

They also have them at ports, etc.

Some examples -

  • https://clui.org/project-page/10236/10356

  • https://www.refrigeratedfrozenfood.com/articles/88099-tyson-foods-adds-cold-storage-capabilities-to-fresh-meats-facility

  • https://dentonrc.com/news/tyson-foods-asks-for-incentives-to-build-denton-warehouse/article_34a23949-1c7f-5e6d-ac24-64eb889dfab6.html


  • And then just like that, they could manipulate their use during the pandemic - https://www.perishablenews.com/meatpoultry/tyson-to-shut-down-emporia-cold-storage/

    They had done it back in 2010 after the Great Recession too - https://www.nwaonline.com/news/2010/may/23/ripple-effect-cold-storage-fights-chilly--20100523/

    Eventually due to the massive COVID infections at the processing plants, they had to shut those down and that eventually drained the stuff in storage (that had been held).

    The latest "business model" is to operate as a "just in time" style manufacturing/storage/distribution system. That is what killed the TP industry during the early part of the pandemic, with that product quickly disappearing from the shelves but not enough capacity to scale up production to meet an increased demand.

    oldsoftie

    (12,492 posts)
    10. "Just in time"; learned from the Japanese, hurt MANY businesses. Like autos.
    Thu May 12, 2022, 06:17 PM
    May 2022

    We're still feeling the impact of one part not being in stock stopping production. And too many foreign suppliers.

    I would like to see Congress pass a law, SOME kind of law, to in some way force companies OUT of China. Especially companies making/buying critical items.
    We are FAR more chained to China than we ever were with russia

    BumRushDaShow

    (128,527 posts)
    11. I agree
    Thu May 12, 2022, 06:39 PM
    May 2022

    although oddly enough, and I never thought I'd see the day, but because of the continued lockdowns in China, Apple is getting slammed and has now "admitted" to maybe possibly looking at other countries for their supply chain.

    Earlier in the year, they were blaming Japan and started moving to more Chinese companies for certain chips, but now the handwriting is on the wall -

    Apple’s Overdependence on China Shows in $8 Billion Supply-Chain Snag


    Mark Gurman
    May 1, 2022, 9:45 AM EDT
    Share this article

    Apple products are primarily assembled in China, and that’s brought headaches in recent years—including supply-chain woes in its latest quarter. The tech giant should now engage in a rapid expansion elsewhere. Also: A look at last quarter’s results and how the company is slowing hiring at some stores. Apple Inc. likes to say that its supply chain is global and that it isn’t overly dependent on China.

    The reality is that Apple is tremendously reliant on the country for manufacturing, and this relationship has caused headaches for the company, investors and consumers during the pandemic. That was especially evident on the company’s second-quarter conference call last week, when Apple warned that supply shortages—spurred in large part by Covid-19 lockdowns in China—would reduce sales by as much as $8 billion. That’s like losing an entire quarter’s worth of iPad sales.

    During the call, Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook reiterated the stance that Apple’s supply chain is “truly global,” with products made everywhere, including the U.S. But it’s clear that the company could shift more of its manufacturing out of China. Cook hinted that Apple may be looking to do more of that, noting that a growing number of chips are produced domestically. “We continue to look at optimizing,” he said. Already, Apple gets many of its components from outside China.

    The parts that go into the iPhone, iPad, Mac and other products are made all over the world, from the U.S. to India to Vietnam to Japan. But the real bottleneck in production is the assembly process, better known within Apple and the manufacturing field as FATP. That stands for final assembly, test and pack. The vast majority of Apple devices go through that process in China. That’s why your MacBook Pro, iPad or iPhone probably says, “Assembled in China.”

    (snip)

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2022-05-01/will-apple-aapl-move-more-of-its-supply-chain-out-of-china-l2nchsuj


    For some interesting reason, Europe is able to do more restrictions and a higher level of regulatory enforcement when compared to the U.S. and then that means we end up paying more because we are subsidizing the rest of the world (the same goes for pharmaceuticals).

    keithbvadu2

    (36,676 posts)
    7. Wisconsin Supreme Court justice: Meatpackers aren't 'regular folks'
    Thu May 12, 2022, 01:05 PM
    May 2022

    Wisconsin Supreme Court justice: Meatpackers aren't 'regular folks'

    https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142489043

    cstanleytech

    (26,248 posts)
    8. I suspect that they also hyped it to manipulate the price of said meat
    Thu May 12, 2022, 01:58 PM
    May 2022

    in order to increase their profits which imo should lead to dissolving the companies like what happened to the original AT&T.

    amcgrath

    (397 posts)
    13. There needs to be all sorts of investigations
    Thu May 12, 2022, 08:19 PM
    May 2022

    Into corporate behaviour surrounding the pandemic. From the very beginning, when 3M held the government to ransom, demanding that they could be held liable for flaws in unrelated equipment they had sold in the past.
    We cannot shrug these things off. The companies should No that profiteering, especially in a time of crisis will incur heavy penalties

    Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Meatpackers hyped 'basele...