You want us to look at all that long time in which Felicia did not get fired.
But now that she condemns a colleague and gets fired shortly afterward, you imply that the Washington Post somehow saw the light and decided that what Felicia did before her sexism condemnation warrants termination.
No, it wasn't her reaction to Weigel. It was how she continued to trash other colleagues and the Washington Post. Not just making the workplace toxic, but actually affecting the ability of others to do their job:
This source continued, “It’s frustrating to have this person make these assertions broadly about the Post and imply and amplify this idea that there’s this great division and that the Post has this toxic work environment when that is not the case.”
And yet another said it goes well beyond newsroom bickering.
“This is affecting sourcing relationships,” they said, adding that sources have told them that they are hesitant to talk to the Post right now because of all the “drama.”
She was told by management to stop trashing her coworkers publicly and she refused. At this point it seems pretty clear: they either have to accept her trashing the paper and the people working there or they have to let her go.
= new reply since forum marked as read
