Supreme Court Sides With Coach Over Prayers on 50-Yard Line
Source: New York Times
Supreme Court Sides With Coach Over Prayers on 50-Yard Line
Joseph Kennedy, a former high school football coach in Bremerton, Wash., had a constitutional right to pray on the field after his teams games, the justices ruled.
By Adam Liptak
June 27, 2022, 10:04 a.m. ET
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that a high school football coach had a constitutional right to pray at the 50-yard line after his teams games.
The vote was 6 to 3, with the courts three liberal members in dissent.
The case pitted the rights of government workers to free speech and the free exercise of their faith against the Constitutions prohibition of government endorsement of religion and the ability of public employers to regulate speech in the workplace. The decision was in tension with decades of Supreme Court precedents that forbade pressuring students to participate in religious activities.
The case concerned Joseph Kennedy, an assistant coach at a public high school in Bremerton, Wash., near Seattle. For eight years, Mr. Kennedy routinely offered prayers after games, with students often joining him. He also led and participated in prayers in the locker room, a practice he later abandoned and did not defend in the Supreme Court.
{snip}
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/27/us/politics/supreme-court-coach-prayers.html
I don't subscribe to the NYT, so I can't give you a link that allows you free access to the article.
-- -- -- -- -- --
SCOTUSblog:
We have the first opinion, and it is Kennedy v. Bremerton School District.
Sotomayor dissents, joined by Breyer and Kagan.
ShareReplies0Likes0
Amy Howe
a few seconds ago
It is by Justice Gorsuch, and the vote is 6-3.
ShareReplies0Likes0
Amy Howe
a few seconds ago
Here is the link: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-418_i425.pdf
The Court holds that both the free exercise and free speech clauses protect Kennedy's right to pray at midfield following high school football games.
https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/06/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-june-27/
-- -- -- -- -- --
The Supreme Court's first decision of the day is Kennedy v. Bremerton. In a 6-3 opinion by Gorsuch, the court holds that public school officials have a constitutional right to pray publicly, and lead students in prayer, during school events. https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-418_i425.pdf
The Supreme Court formally overrules the Lemon test and the endorsement test, substantially cutting back the Establishment Clause's separation of church and state. This is another maximalist decision. https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/21-418_i425.pdf
Link to tweet
Response to mahatmakanejeeves (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to Chin music (Reply #1)
eppur_se_muova This message was self-deleted by its author.
turbinetree
(24,695 posts)well will not being going to "any" games, I even switch the channel during the national anthem, then come back to watch ...
Walleye
(31,008 posts)And pray to Jesus, of course
NullTuples
(6,017 posts)I can guarantee, both are already happening just not overtly. But that doesn't make the coercion any less real.
Walleye
(31,008 posts)When I was in first grade we were still reading the Bible and praying in school. One of my best friends was Jewish I remember her covering her ears during the Lords prayer. I have never forgotten that and the embarrassment it causes. School is difficult enough for chrissakes
jimfields33
(15,769 posts)This wasnt during the game. It was an empty stadium. This one is a not sure for me.
shrike3
(3,572 posts)happy feet
(869 posts)in his car or off the field. He went to his car, then decided 'God" wanted him to return to the playing field to pray in public. The whole point of praying after the game was to exhibit his 'religiousness' in public in a coercive fashion that intimidated some players to join him or be known as not joining him in prayer. He chose to go to the middle of the football field to do this.
All one has to do is to imagine a Muslim football coach doing this and well.............................you know the rest.
Roy Rolling
(6,911 posts)A personal act on the coachs own time isnt forbidden by Constitutional law.
NullTuples
(6,017 posts)former9thward
(31,978 posts)He did not ask the players to join. He initially did it by himself.
NullTuples
(6,017 posts)He was there as part of his school employment, as coach. He was out on the field in his role as coach.
That is acting as coach.
Any players who were not Christian I guarantee felt pressure to "do the right thing" and perform Christianity for him.
These are questions of coercion, and abuse of power as much as anything else.
former9thward
(31,978 posts)The school admitted in court employees were on their personal time at that point. No players were asked to join him. On the three occasions the school cited for firing him no players joined him for the prayers.
NullTuples
(6,017 posts)Did people walk up and call him "coach"?
Did people see him as being there as the coach?
former9thward
(31,978 posts)Are you saying he can't go to church because people will call him coach?
NullTuples
(6,017 posts)You can argue the semantics and technicalities all you want; I'm not going to any more. Thanks for the discussion, I'm out.
Captain Zero
(6,801 posts)I bet he did.
NullTuples
(6,017 posts)jimfields33
(15,769 posts)Thats what the Democratic Party does. Doesnt matter a lick if we agree or not. This person was fired and sued. He won his case. End it f story.
NullTuples
(6,017 posts)jimfields33
(15,769 posts)NullTuples
(6,017 posts)They know they'd better get out there and "do the right thing" by performing Christianity for him.
What about their rights?
Marthe48
(16,935 posts)I attened a Zoom exercise class led by a friend of mine. Zoom becauseof covid, attended because I couldn't come up with a graceful excuse not to attend from home. Several times over the last year one or more of the people who attended in person started a prayer session the end of class. The Zoom connection ended in May and I'm not going to go to the gym for the classes. One because of Covid and 2 because of the prayers.
Diamond_Dog
(31,977 posts)Plus he did it immediately after the game in the most visible place possible.
Have yer prayer meetings in the locker room if you wanna pray. Nobody is stopping him from praying. H just wants to be in everyones face about it.
jimfields33
(15,769 posts)I like it out in the open. Much better.
sl8
(13,736 posts)The school specifically told him that he could pray after the stadium was emptied, but he declined.
From J Sotomayor's dissent:
The court noted that he had in fact refused an accommodation
permitting him to pray . . . after the stadium had emptied,
indicat[ing] that it is essential that his speech be delivered
in the presence of students and spectators.
[...]
They witnessed members of the public and state representatives going onto the field to support Kennedys cause and pray with him. Kennedy did nothing to stop this unauthorized access to the field, a clear dereliction of his duties. The BHS players in fact joined the crowd around Kennedy after he stood up from praying at the last game. That BHS students did not join Kennedy in these last three specific prayers did not make those events compliant with the Establishment Clause. The coercion to do so was evident. Kennedy himself apparently anticipated that his continued prayer practice would draw student participation, requesting that the District agree that it would not interfere with students joining him in the future.
[...]
He could have prayed in his car or anywhere other than the field. The Supreme Court is letting Christian religion inform their rulings. What happened to separation of church and state? Because you believe abortion is immoral doesnt give your religion belief the right to overturn my non-religious belief at a minimum.
Now on speedway to conservative Christian rule.
Walleye
(31,008 posts)Response to Walleye (Reply #3)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
OnlinePoker
(5,719 posts)Walleye
(31,008 posts)Why should the atheists in that school be embarrassed by not participating
NullTuples
(6,017 posts)This was very much still in his role as "coach", ie gov't employee.
Diamond_Dog
(31,977 posts)He did it immediately after a game, like when the game clock ran out. when the stands were just starting to empty out and players were still on the sidelines.
jimfields33
(15,769 posts)Walleye
(31,008 posts)jimfields33
(15,769 posts)I think it will workout.
Walleye
(31,008 posts)jimfields33
(15,769 posts)Walleye
(31,008 posts)They will keep pushing until they have forced their religion back into schools and on all of the kids.
jimfields33
(15,769 posts)Right now. Its after school activities when most have gone home. What could happen hasnt.
Walleye
(31,008 posts)jimfields33
(15,769 posts)Roe is a million times worse and that must be for congress focus for now.
Walleye
(31,008 posts)appmanga
(571 posts)...strikes again.
bdamomma
(63,836 posts)nt
BumRushDaShow
(128,844 posts)By Adam Liptak
June 27, 2022, 10:04 a.m. ET
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that a high school football coach had a constitutional right to pray at the 50-yard line after his teams games. The vote was 6 to 3, with the courts three liberal members in dissent. The case pitted the rights of government workers to free speech and the free exercise of their faith against the Constitutions prohibition of government endorsement of religion and the ability of public employers to regulate speech in the workplace. The decision was in tension with decades of Supreme Court precedents that forbade pressuring students to participate in religious activities.
The case concerned Joseph Kennedy, an assistant coach at a public high school in Bremerton, Wash., near Seattle. For eight years, Mr. Kennedy routinely offered prayers after games, with students often joining him. He also led and participated in prayers in the locker room, a practice he later abandoned and did not defend in the Supreme Court. In 2015, after an opposing coach told the principal at Mr. Kennedys school that he thought it was pretty cool that Mr. Kennedy was allowed to pray on the field, the school board instructed Mr. Kennedy not to pray if it interfered with his duties or involved students. The two sides disagreed about whether Mr. Kennedy complied.
A school official recommended that the coachs contract not be renewed for the 2016 season, and Mr. Kennedy did not reapply for the position. The two sides offered starkly different accounts of what had happened in Mr. Kennedys final months, complicating the Supreme Courts task. Mr. Kennedy said he sought only to offer a brief, silent and solitary prayer little different from saying grace before a meal in the school cafeteria. The school board responded that the public nature of his prayers and his stature as a leader and role model meant that students felt forced to participate, whatever their religion and whether they wanted to or not.Over the last 60 years, the Supreme Court has rejected prayer in public schools, at least when it was officially required or part of a formal ceremony like a high school graduation.
As recently as 2000, the court ruled that organized prayers led by students at high school football games violated the First Amendments prohibition of government establishment of religion. The delivery of a pregame prayer has the improper effect of coercing those present to participate in an act of religious worship, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority. Mr. Kennedys lawyers said those school prayer precedents were not relevant because they involved government speech. The core question in Mr. Kennedys case, they said, was whether government employees give up their own rights to free speech and the free exercise of religion at the workplace.
(snip)
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/27/us/politics/supreme-court-coach-prayers.html
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)I'm adding this to my list of tweeters to watch:
https://twitter.com/adamliptak
We get a week off from employment reports.
And good morning.
BumRushDaShow
(128,844 posts)and WaPo has their breaking about 5 minutes later.
And thanks for the heads-up about Friday. Was figuring that since it'll be July 1st (and then Monday is the holiday).
By Robert Barnes
June 27, 2022 at 10:12 a.m. EDT
The Supreme Court on Monday ruled for a former high school football coach who lost his job after leading postgame prayers at midfield, in the courts latest decision favoring the public exercise of faith over concerns about government endorsement of religion. Justice Neil M. Gorsuch wrote for fellow conservatives in the 6 to 3 decision, saying Joseph Kennedys prayers are protected by the Constitutions guarantees of free speech and free religious exercise and the school districts actions were not warranted under a concern of violating the separation of church and state.
The Constitution and the best of our traditions counsel mutual respect and tolerance, not censorship and suppression, for religious and nonreligious views alike, Gorsuch wrote. Liberal Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan dissented. The case raised questions about the ability of public employees to live out their faith and the governments competing responsibility to protect schoolchildren from coercion and to remain neutral on the subject of religion.
As in many of the courts recent cases, it called for interpretation of how the Constitutions establishment clause, which forbids government endorsement of religion, interacts with its free speech and free exercise clauses, which prohibit government restraints on the private observance of religion.
The Roberts court has recently been overwhelmingly protective of religious rights, and advocates said the case was another opportunity to transform decades of Supreme Court jurisprudence that started 60 years ago with the admonition that government cannot organize and promote prayer in public schools.
(snip)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/06/27/supreme-court-praying-football-coach/
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,844 posts)And here is an archive.org (non-paywall) version of the NYT article - https://web.archive.org/web/20220627141052/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/27/us/politics/supreme-court-coach-prayers.html
multigraincracker
(32,673 posts)covering ones ears and chanting La-la-la-la during the prayer?
xocetaceans
(3,871 posts)n/t
eShirl
(18,490 posts)Moostache
(9,895 posts)And Wiccan rituals
And goat sacrifices
And virgin offerings
And pasta meals
And rain dances
Open and constant warfare without relenting.
All religions or no religions. Period.
intheflow
(28,462 posts)I like it!
PatSeg
(47,399 posts)Freedom for some should be freedom for all.
Meanwhile, anyone can "pray" anywhere at any time, but silently. Jesus had a pretty low regard for people who made a public display of their worship and called them hypocrites.
Moostache
(9,895 posts)*except to condemn him for nearly everything GOP Jesus has been twisted into...
Religions carry no weight with me, I simply reject 1 more god than others are willing to, but the state sponsoring of a single faith tradition over others is inherently dangerous and will lead to horrifying results.
PatSeg
(47,399 posts)and another huge step backward for our country.
I have no problem with most of the alleged teachings of Jesus, but I have known so few Christians who lived by them. As Mahatma Gandhi said, "I like your Christ, but not your Christianity."
Lonestarblue
(9,971 posts)by piece. Just like in Iran and Afghanistan, it is the Christian ayatollahs who are governing and making laws based on their personal religious beliefs. I guess they have forgotten the Biblical admonition in Matthew 6:6:
But when you pray, go into your room and shut the door and pray to your Father who is in secret. And your Father who sees in secret will reward you.
And Matthew 6:1:
Beware of practicing your righteousness before other people in order to be seen by them, for then you will have no reward from your Father who is in heaven.
PatSeg
(47,399 posts)I just made a reference to Jesus's teachings about public prayer before I saw your comment. It is hard to find a self-described "Christian" who isn't a hypocrite. It is as if the New Testament doesn't even exist.
The Grand Illuminist
(1,331 posts)Whether or not high school football games are considered school time.
groundloop
(11,518 posts)I've no doubt that the radical right justices have said that any of the players on the team are free not to participate in the prayer. Think about this - Coach (who has total control over the team) calls the team together for a prayer and three players refuse to participate in the team prayer.
In a perfect world those three players would just go to the locker room, end of story. But in the real world the coach is going to be pissed that those three didn't join with the rest of the team in his prayer session and they'll have extra pressure put on them to participate next time or else face consequences (less playing time, punishment at practice, etc.). So in essence those three players are being coerced to participate in a prayer session while participating on a team which is part of a public school.
The Grand Illuminist
(1,331 posts)You are right though. But right now this rung only dealt with coach vs. school district.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,582 posts)How long will it be before (Christian) prayers are read over the PA system before the game?
Walleye
(31,008 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,128 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,444 posts)groundloop
(11,518 posts)bdamomma
(63,836 posts)to exacerbate more global climate disastrous changes.
packman
(16,296 posts)under the goal posts - What fools these mortals be.,,, I love it when two coaches in their locker rooms pray for victory and God goes, "Nope , we got a bet on Bob's team"
Aristus
(66,316 posts)Anything else is religious grandstanding. Which Jesus cautioned against.
James48
(4,435 posts)Now that SIX Justices who are Catholic are on the Court- three Jewish Justices, and NO Protestants, we will find a lot more
right-wing Catholic-based rulings, I believe.
Pretty crazy times.
LoisB
(7,201 posts)Matthew 6:5-6
King James Version
5 And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.
6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
Seeking Serenity
(2,840 posts)The dissonance here would be ear-splitting.
It's kinda funny to think about really.
LoisB
(7,201 posts)twodogsbarking
(9,732 posts)samsingh
(17,595 posts)jimfields33
(15,769 posts)Im sure as long as nobody gets in each others way, all are free to pray anyway they desire.
samsingh
(17,595 posts)jimfields33
(15,769 posts)packman
(16,296 posts)Separation of church/state (Ha, ha) issue. If it was a public field, park, street corner - I'm OK with that, let him babble as much as he wants but keep it off school grounds. What is he a groomer?
malthaussen
(17,187 posts)Since this appears to be an individual act, he hardly can be accused of that.
That said, there is a certain grey area here, as the coach is also the representative of the team and school, and so his actions might be legitimately construed as actions in his official capacity, and not as a private person. The school would be right, then, in cautioning him against such acts in future, but if this was a first offense, firing would be out of line. If, however, the coach was praying after being told not to, then the issue is no longer one of religious freedom, it is one of due subordination of an employee to his employers. Now, that opens up a nice little can o'worms. Can an employer legitimately deny an employee the right to exercise his religion? What if the employer is a State institution, such as a public school? Is the freedom to exercise a right identical with an endorsement of the exercise? Even if we stipulate that formally it is not, how will it be seen by witnesses? Some food for thought, here.
-- Mal
AllyCat
(16,177 posts)Polybius
(15,381 posts)I know this was after the game and voluntary, but was he and his students still on the clock, or was it after school hours? If it was after than I agree with the decision.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,393 posts)http://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf
Link to tweet
Bayard
(22,057 posts)"And He shepherds His flock
We sing out and we praise His name
He supports us in war
He presides over football games"
More pressure on kids to conform, be assimilated into the zombie minority.
We were at a land auction last week, and the realtor led off with a long, rambling Jesus prayer. Maybe it was for the Amish who attended. I wanted to jump up, and scream--Hail, Satan!
bluestarone
(16,906 posts)#1.This is a small thing that will LEAD to HUGE things, i'm thinking. #2 i STAND with the dissenters here! There IS a reason they dissented! 3# I hate religion of any kind in PUBLIC SCHOOLS!
Duncan Grant
(8,262 posts)Hegemony, conformity, power - I hate being in what should be secular space only to negotiate someones religious performance. Its creepy and so very passive aggressive.
Take your well rehearsed incantations to whatever space they truly belong and leave the rest of us in peace.
eppur_se_muova
(36,259 posts)This must be the right wingers' least favorite passage in the whole Bible.
Matthew 6:1 is also appropriate.
rsdsharp
(9,165 posts)Beer Bong Brett played high school football (he says). He knows that there are absolutely no repercussions if a player doesnt do what a coach wants.
usaf-vet
(6,181 posts)The coffee clutch lawyer said it DID open up prayers in the classroom.
If so we are speeding downhill faster than I would have imagined.
So when are we going to stop saying as we are beaten? Whack ..... "thank you sir may I have another".
I am really sick of this shit!
Deep State Witch
(10,424 posts)To a coach leading a prayer to Shango, Krishna, Hermes, or any other deity prior to a football game.
pfitz59
(10,357 posts)Does this look like 'alone'? on his own time?
Roy Rolling
(6,911 posts)Many people comment without reading the article. Facts are common ground, ignore them at your own peril. Read twice, comment once. Not comment twice, then read the article.
Martin68
(22,791 posts)Captain Zero
(6,801 posts)For the teams I'm a fan of, the praying coaches must not be praying for wins.
I wish my teams would quit hiring them, just hire a young coach who knows the latest about how the game is played.
I'll bet the guy got fired because he wasn't winning.
Maybe he was praying he could keep his job.