August jobs report: U.S. payrolls grew by 315,000 last month
Source: Yahoo! Finance
The U.S. labor market grew as expected in August as more people entering the workforce pushed the unemployment rate higher last month. Here are the highlights from the Labor Department's monthly jobs report released Friday, compared to consensus estimates from Bloomberg.
Non-farm payrolls: 315,000 vs. +298,000 expected Unemployment rate: 3.7% vs. 3.5% expected Average hourly earnings, month-over-month: +0.3% vs. +0.4% expected Average hourly earnings, year-over-year: +5.2% vs. +5.3% expected
The labor force participation rate in August also registered a notable uptick, to 62.4% from 62.1% the prior month, matching the highest level since March 2020.
Friday's report showed a modest revision to July's payroll growth, with the BLS now estimating 526,000 jobs were created last month, down from the 528,000 previously reported. Between revisions to June and July's figures, there were 107,000 fewer jobs created over those months than initially estimated. Still, job gains over the last three months have averaged 378,000. In 2019, average monthly job gains stood at 164,000.
Read more: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/august-jobs-report-september-2-2022-220121393.html
Breaking now...
Stand by for the deep dives and original sources of the data from DU's dedicated economy watchers. TGIF!
Now being updated. Previous update -
Here are highlights from the latest monthly jobs report from the Labor Department released Friday, compared to consensus estimates from Bloomberg.
Non-farm payrolls: 315,000 vs. +298,000 expected Unemployment rate: 3.7% vs. 3.5% expected Average hourly earnings, month-over-month: +0.3% vs. +0.4% expected Average hourly earnings, year-over-year: +5.2% vs. +5.3% expected
Last month's report marked a cooldown from the prior month, which saw payrolls rise by a revised 526,000 jobs. Still, the figure reflects strong hiring on a historical basis, with monthly payroll gains averaging about 164,000 per month in 2019 prior to the pandemic.
The unemployment rate ticked up slightly to 3.7% in August from 3.5% the prior month. The labor force participation also edged marginally higher last month, rising to 62.4% from 62.1% in July. Meanwhile, average hourly earnings cooled slightly to 0.3% on a monthly basis, lower than July's wage gains of 0.4%. On an annual basis, earnings year-over-year inched down to 5.2%, compared to 5.3% the prior month.
Original article -
Here are highlights from the latest monthly jobs report from the Labor Department released Friday, compared to consensus estimates from Bloomberg.
Non-farm payrolls: 315,000 vs. +298,000 expected Unemployment rate: 3.7% vs. 3.5% expected Average hourly earnings, month-over-month: +0.3% vs. +0.4% expected Average hourly earnings, year-over-year: +5.2% vs. +5.3% expected
This post is breaking. Please check back for updates.
progree
(10,893 posts)Every one of these data series comes with a table and graph.
# Nonfarm Employment (Establishment Survey, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001
Monthly changes (in thousands): https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth
NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CEU0000000001
# Employed in thousands from the separate Household Survey, http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000
Monthly changes (in thousands): http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000?output_view=net_1mth
NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02000000
# Nonfarm PRIVATE Employment (Establishment Survey, https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001
Monthly changes: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001?output_view=net_1mth
^-Good for comparison to the ADP report that typically comes out a few days earlier
NOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CEU0500000001
# INFLATION ADJUSTED Weekly Earnings of Production and Non-Supervisory Workers http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000031
# Labor Force http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11000000?output_view=net_1mth
The labor force is the sum of employed and unemployed. To count as unemployed, one must have actively sought work in the past 4 weeks (just looking at want ads and job postings doesn't count)
# ETPR (Employment-To-Population Ratio) aka Employment Rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300000
# LFPR (Labor Force Participation rate) http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000
Unemployed, Unemployment Rate
# Unemployed http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS13000000
# Unemployment rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000
# Black unemployment rate (%), https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000006
# Hispanic or Latino unemployment rate (%), https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000009
# White unemployment rate (%), https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000003
# U-6 unemployment rate http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS13327709
------------ end unemployed, unemployment rates --------
# NILF -- Not in Labor Forcehttp://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS15000000
# NILF-WJ -- Not in Labor Force, Wants Job http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS15026639
# Part-Time Workers who want Full-Time Jobs (Table A-8's Part-Time For Economic Reasons) http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12032194
# Part-Time Workers (Table A-9) http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12600000
# Full-Time Workers (Table A-9) http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12500000
# Multiple Jobholders as a Percent of Employed (Table A-9) https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12026620
# Civilian non-institutional population
Seasonally adjusted (they seem to have gotten rid of this) https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS10000000
NOT seasonally adjusted: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU00000000
LFPR - Labor Force Participation Rate for some age groups
The LFPR is the Employed + jobless people who have looked for work in the last 4 weeks (and say they want a job and are able to take one if offered). All divided by the civilian non-institutional population age 16+.
SA means Seasonally adjusted. NSA means Not Seasonally Adjusted
16+: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300000
25-34: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300089 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300089
25-54: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300060 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300060
55-64: -------------------- NSA: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300095
55+: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11324230 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01324230
65+: SA: ---------------- NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU01300097
LFPR - Labor Force Particpation Rate (prime age 25-54) by gender
All: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300060
Men: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300061
Women: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300062
ETPR - Employment to Population Ratio for some age groups
SA means Seasonally adjusted. NSA means Not Seasonally Adjusted
16+: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300000 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300000
25-34: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300089 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300089
25-54: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12300060 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300060
55-64: SA: ---------------- NSA: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300095
55+: SA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12324230 NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02324230
65+: SA: ---------------- NSA: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNU02300097
Inflation rate (CPI)
. . . Monthly report: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
. . . The Data Series: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SA0
. . . . . . Monthly changes: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CUSR0000SA0?output_view=pct_1mth
. . . Calculator at: https://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm
Grocery prices (food at home) inflation compared to overall inflation rate
. . . . . https://www.in2013dollars.com/Food-at-home/price-inflation
. . . From 1947 to 2021 and from 2000 to 2021, food at home inflation very slightly lagged the overall inflation rate
. . . . . https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142735789
Data series finder: https://www.bls.gov/data/#employment
The entire report: http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf
Archives of previous reports - The monthly payroll employment reports from the BLS are archived at Archived News Releases (https://www.bls.gov/bls/news-release/ ). In the list up at the top, under Major Economic Indicators, select Employment Situation ( https://www.bls.gov/bls/news-release/empsit.htm ). That opens up links to reports going back to 1994. Hat tip Mahatmakanejeeves.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,319 posts)Monthly changes: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0500000001?output_view=net_1mth
^-Good for comparison to the ADP report that typically comes out a few days earlier
Wed Aug 31, 2022: Private payrolls grew by just 132,000 in August, ADP says in reworked jobs report
progree
(10,893 posts)mahatmakanejeeves
(57,319 posts)And good morning to everyone taking part in or just plain reading the thread.
BumRushDaShow
(128,520 posts)and had this up at 8:31 am EDT.
Good morning!
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,319 posts)She was up early too. The time stamp on her preliminary account was 5:48 a.m. The preliminary article:
Fri Sep 2, 2022, 06:59 AM: Stock futures wobble ahead of August jobs report
Emily used to post her preliminary articles at about 3:00 p.m. the day before the release.
From your post of the WaPo article:
And good morning to you too.
BumRushDaShow
(128,520 posts)I was refreshing multiple sites that also included CNBC because sometimes they scoop the others, but Alexandra's headline had an instant update at 8:31!
progree
(10,893 posts)One of the rare (lately) cases of downward revisions of the prior 2 months.
So we have 315,000 - 107,000 = 208,000 more jobs than were reported in last month's report.
Total nonfarm payroll jobs
152,536,000 July, per 8/5/22 report
152,744,000 August, per 9/2/22 report
--------------------------------------------
208,000 Difference
Frankly its not a stellar jobs report. More of a Goldilocks report -- not too hot and not too cold. I hope Fed Chair Powell is pleased by the slowdown in growth. So that he doesn't hit us with a 3/4 % rate increase in September.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,319 posts)Fri Sep 2, 2022: Links to earlier reports (this one):
Wed Aug 31, 2022: Links to earlier reports:
Fri Aug 5, 2022: Links to earlier reports:
Wed Aug 3, 2022: ADP has suspended its report until September.
Fri Jul 8, 2022: Links to earlier reports:
Wed Jul 6, 2022: ADP has suspended its report until September.
Fri Jun 3, 2022: Links to earlier reports:
Wed Jun 1, 2022: Links to earlier reports:
Fri May 6, 2022: Links to earlier reports
Wed May 4, 2022: Links to earlier reports:
Fri Apr 1, 2022: Links to earlier reports:
Wed Mar 30, 2022: Links to earlier reports:
Fri Mar 4, 2022: Links to earlier reports:
Wed Mar 2, 2022: Links to earlier reports:
Fri Feb 4, 2022: Links to earlier reports:
Wed Feb 2, 2022: Links to earlier reports:
Wed Jan 12, 2022: Links to earlier reports:
Wed Jan 5, 2022: Links to earlier reports:
Sat Dec 4, 2021: Links to earlier reports:
Wed Dec 1, 2021: Links to additional earlier reports:
Fri Nov 5, 2021: (I had to split the links into two posts, due to "Forbidden 403" issues)
Links to earlier reports:
Links to additional earlier reports:
Wed Nov 3, 2021: Links to earlier reports:
Fri Oct 8, 2021: Links to earlier reports:
Wed Oct 6, 2021: Links to earlier reports:
Fri Sep 3, 2021: Links to earlier reports:
Thu Sep 2, 2021 (in the Friday, August 6, BLS thread): Links to earlier reports:
Wed Aug 4, 2021: Links to earlier reports:
-- -- -- -- -- --
[center]Past Performance is Not a Guarantee of Future Results.[/center]
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in August 2022 (this one):
August jobs report: U.S. payrolls grew by 315,000 last month
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in August 2022:
Private payrolls grew by just 132,000 in August, ADP says in reworked jobs report
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in July 2022:
Employers added 528,000 jobs in July, as the hot labor market powers on
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in July 2022:
ADP has suspended its report until September.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in June 2022:
June jobs report: Payrolls rise by 372,000 as unemployment holds at 3.6%
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in June 2022:
ADP has suspended its report until September.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in May 2022:
May jobs report: Payrolls rise by 390,000 as unemployment holds at 3.6%
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in May 2022:
U.S. Treasury yields fall as data show slowest job growth in pandemic recovery
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in April 2022:
April jobs report: Payrolls rise by 428,000 as unemployment rate holds at 3.6%
[ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in April 2022:
U.S. Companies Added 247,000 Jobs in April, ADP Data Show
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in March 2022:
U.S. economy adds 431,000 jobs in March
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in March 2022:
Private payrolls rose by 455,000 in March, topping expectations: ADP
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in February 2022:
February jobs report: Payrolls rise by 678,000 as unemployment rate falls to 3.8%
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in February 2022:
Private payrolls rose by 475,000 in February, topping expectations: ADP
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in January 2022:
January jobs report: Payrolls jump by 467,000 as unemployment rate rises to 4.0%
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in January 2022:
Companies unexpectedly cut 301,000 jobs in January as omicron slams jobs market, ADP says
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in December 2021:
December jobs report: Payrolls rise by 199,000 as unemployment rate falls to 3.9%
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in December 2021:
December private payrolls rose by 807,000, far exceeding expectations: ADP
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in November 2021:
U.S. economy adds just 210,000 jobs in November
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in November 2021:
November private payrolls rose by 534,000 topping expectations: ADP
Nonetheless, what is important is not this month's results, but the trend. Lets look at some earlier numbers:
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in November 2021:
November private payrolls rose by 534,000 topping expectations: ADP
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in October 2021:
October jobs report: Payrolls grew by 531,000 as unemployment rate fell to 4.6%
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in October 2021:
October private payrolls rose by 571,000, topping expectations: ADP
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in September 2021:
Yahoo Finance September jobs report: Economy adds back disappointing 194,000 jobs, unemployment rate
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in September 2021
September private payrolls rose by 568,000, topping estimates: ADP
Bureau of Labor Statistics, for employment in August 2021:
August jobs report: Payrolls rise by disappointing 235,000 while unemployment rate falls to 5.2%
ADP® (Automatic Data Processing), for employment in August 2021:
August private payrolls rose by 374,000, missing estimates: ADP
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)FACTS don't support the Republicons spew.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)The higher interest rates will go, and the longer they'll stay there. Inflation is maybe off it's high, but it's still at an astronomical rate. The Fed wants the labor market to soften to fight this inflation, and it's doing a lot to make it so.
QT is likely to hit harder than people expect, and the housing market is mid-jump off a cliff. The Cleveland Fed yesterday said they want the federal funds rate (the rate banks lend to each other) to be over 4% from 2.25% today, close to a 100% increase. That's going to make borrowing VERY, VERY, VERY expensive for the next decade or two. All that credit card debt people have is going to get even more ridiculous.
The positive side of this downturn is that it's likely to take full effect in 2023 after the mid-terms. But make no mistake, we're going to have a hell of an economic downturn.
IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)and that the Fed will act strongly in response. If they have nothing, they will make something up.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,319 posts)Employment Situation Summary
Transmission of material in this news release is embargoed until 8:30 a.m. (ET) Friday, September 2, 2022
Technical information:
Household data: (202) 691-6378 * cpsinfo@bls.gov * www.bls.gov/cps
Establishment data: (202) 691-6555 * cesinfo@bls.gov * www.bls.gov/ces
Media contact: (202) 691-5902 * PressOffice@bls.gov
THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION -- AUGUST 2022
Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 315,000 in August, and the unemployment rate rose to 3.7 percent, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Notable job gains occurred in professional and business services, health care, and retail trade.
This news release presents statistics from two monthly surveys. The household survey measures labor force status, including unemployment, by demographic characteristics. The establishment survey measures nonfarm employment, hours, and earnings by industry. For more information about the concepts and statistical methodology used in these two surveys, see the Technical Note.
Household Survey Data
In August, the unemployment rate rose by 0.2 percentage point to 3.7 percent, and the number of unemployed persons increased by 344,000 to 6.0 million. In July, these measures had returned to their levels in February 2020, prior to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. (See table A-1.)
Among the major worker groups, the unemployment rates for adult men (3.5 percent) and Hispanics (4.5 percent) rose in August. The jobless rates for adult women (3.3 percent), teenagers (10.4 percent), Whites (3.2 percent), Blacks (6.4 percent), and Asians (2.8 percent) showed little change over the month. (See tables A-1, A-2, and A-3.)
Among the unemployed, the number of permanent job losers increased by 188,000 to 1.4 million in August. The number of persons on temporary layoff was virtually unchanged at 782,000. (See table A-11.)
The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks or more) was little changed at 1.1 million in August. The long-term unemployed accounted for 18.8 percent of all unemployed persons. (See table A-12.)
The labor force participation rate increased by 0.3 percentage point over the month to 62.4 percent but is 1.0 percentage point below its February 2020 level. The employment-population ratio was little changed at 60.1 percent in August and remains 1.1 percentage points below its February 2020 value. (See table A-1.)
The number of persons employed part time for economic reasons was little changed at 4.1 million in August. These individuals, who would have preferred full-time employment, were working part time because their hours had been reduced or they were unable to find full-time jobs. (See table A-8.)
The number of persons not in the labor force who currently want a job declined by 361,000 to 5.5 million in August. This measure remains above its February 2020 level of 5.0 million. These individuals were not counted as unemployed because they were not actively looking for work during the 4 weeks preceding the survey or were unavailable to take a job. (See table A-1.)
Among those not in the labor force who wanted a job, the number of persons marginally attached to the labor force, at 1.4 million, was little changed in August. These individuals wanted and were available for work and had looked for a job sometime in the prior 12 months but had not looked for work in the 4 weeks preceding the survey. Discouraged workers, a subset of the marginally attached who believed that no jobs were available for them, numbered 366,000 in August, little changed from the prior month. (See Summary table A.)
Household Survey Supplemental Data
In August, 6.5 percent of employed persons teleworked because of the coronavirus pandemic, down from 7.1 percent in the prior month. These data refer to employed persons who teleworked or worked at home for pay at some point in the 4 weeks preceding the survey specifically because of the pandemic.
In August, 1.9 million persons reported that they had been unable to work because their employer closed or lost business due to the pandemic--that is, they did not work at all or worked fewer hours at some point in the 4 weeks preceding the survey due to the pandemic. This measure is down from 2.2 million in the previous month. Among those who reported in August that they were unable to work because of pandemic-related closures or lost business, 21.5 percent received at least some pay from their employer for the hours not worked, little different from the previous month.
Among those not in the labor force in August, 523,000 persons were prevented from looking for work due to the pandemic, little changed from the prior month. (To be counted as unemployed, by definition, individuals must be either actively looking for work or on temporary layoff.)
These supplemental data come from questions added to the household survey in May 2020 to help gauge the effects of the pandemic on the labor market. The data are not seasonally adjusted. Tables with estimates from the supplemental questions for all months are available online at www.bls.gov/cps/effects-of-the-coronavirus-covid-19-pandemic.htm. (For more information about upcoming changes to these supplemental data, see the box note at the end of this news release.)
Establishment Survey Data
Total nonfarm payroll employment increased by 315,000 in August. Nonfarm employment has risen by 5.8 million over the past 12 months, as the labor market continued to recover from the job losses of the pandemic-induced recession. This growth brings total nonfarm employment 240,000 higher than its pre-pandemic level in February 2020. In August, notable job gains occurred in professional and business services, health care, and retail trade. (See table B-1.)
Professional and business services added 68,000 jobs in August. Within the industry, employment gains occurred in computer systems design and related services (+14,000), management and technical consulting services (+13,000), architectural and engineering services (+10,000), and scientific research and development services (+6,000), while legal services lost jobs (-9,000). Over the past 12 months, professional and business services has added 1.1 million jobs.
In August, health care employment rose by 48,000, with job gains in offices of physicians (+15,000), hospitals (+15,000), and nursing and residential care facilities (+12,000). Health care has added 412,000 jobs over the year. Despite this growth, employment in health care is below its February 2020 level by 37,000, or 0.2 percent.
Retail trade added 44,000 jobs in August and 422,000 jobs over the past 12 months. In August, employment increased in general merchandise stores (+15,000), food and beverage stores (+15,000), health and personal care stores (+10,000), and building material and garden supply stores (+7,000). Employment in furniture and home furnishings stores continued to trend down (-3,000).
Manufacturing employment continued to trend up in August (+22,000), with gains concentrated in durable goods industries (+19,000). Manufacturing has added 461,000 jobs over the year.
Employment in financial activities rose by 17,000 in August and by 200,000 over the year.
Employment in wholesale trade increased by 15,000 in August, returning to its February 2020 level. This industry has added 197,000 jobs over the year.
Mining employment rose by 6,000 in August, reflecting a gain in support activities for mining (+7,000). Over the year, mining has added 68,000 jobs.
Employment in leisure and hospitality changed little in August (+31,000), following average monthly gains of 90,000 in the first 7 months of the year. Employment in leisure and hospitality is below its February 2020 level by 1.2 million, or 7.2 percent.
In August, employment showed little change in other major industries, including construction, transportation and warehousing, information, other services, and government.
In August, average hourly earnings for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls rose by 10 cents, or 0.3 percent, to $32.36. Over the past 12 months, average hourly earnings have increased by 5.2 percent. In August, average hourly earnings of private-sector production and nonsupervisory employees rose by 10 cents, or 0.4 percent, to $27.68. (See tables B-3 and B-8.)
The average workweek for all employees on private nonfarm payrolls decreased by 0.1 hour to 34.5 hours in August. In manufacturing, the average workweek for all employees was little changed at 40.3 hours, and overtime held at 3.3 hours. The average workweek for production and nonsupervisory employees on private nonfarm payrolls declined by 0.1 hour to 33.9 hours. (See tables B-2 and B-7.)
The change in total nonfarm payroll employment for June was revised down by 105,000, from +398,000 to +293,000, and the change for July was revised down by 2,000, from +528,000 to +526,000. With these revisions, employment in June and July combined is 107,000 lower than previously reported. (Monthly revisions result from additional reports received from businesses and government agencies since the last published estimates and from the recalculation of seasonal factors.)
_____________
The Employment Situation for September is scheduled to be released on Friday, October 7, 2022, at 8:30 a.m. (ET).
{snip a whole lot}
* * * * *
[center]Facilities for Sensory Impaired[/center]
Information from these releases will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200, Federal Relay Services: 1-800-877-8339.
-- -- -- -- -- --
BumRushDaShow
(128,520 posts)Their original "assumption" -
Government data on Friday will show whether the job markets remarkable resilience continued in August, or whether employers have begun to pull back as interest rates rise and recession fears mount.
Forecasters surveyed by FactSet expect the Labor Department to report that U.S. employers added about 300,000 jobs last month, well below Julys gain of 528,000. But economists had also expected a slowdown in July and were surprised when job growth accelerated. Other indicators suggest the job market remains strong: Job openings rose in July, to 11.2 million, and filings for unemployment benefits have edged down in recent weeks.
(snip)
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/09/02/business/jobs-report-august-economy/a-cooling-job-market-is-expected-as-recession-fears-grow?smid=url-share
And their "update" -
Monthly change in jobs
Data is seasonally adjusted. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics By Ella Koeze
Job growth slowed in August but stayed solid, suggesting that rising interest rates and fear of a possible recession are leading companies to pull back on hiring but that the labor market recovery remains resilient.
Employers added 315,000 jobs last month on a seasonally adjusted basis, the Labor Department said Friday. That was down from 526,000 in July, though it still represented a strong pace of growth. The unemployment rate rose to 3.7 percent.
Economists have been saying for months that job growth was likely to slow as the economy comes down from last years vaccine-fueled boom and as higher borrowing costs make it harder for businesses to expand. Instead, the labor market remained red hot even as other parts of the economy, such as the housing market, turned sharply lower. The data released Friday indicated the long-delayed slowdown may finally have begun.
Ordinarily, such a slowdown would be a worrying sign, especially at a time when forecasters are warning of a possible recession. But in the up-is-down world of the late-pandemic economy, a modest pullback in job growth could actually be good news, albeit not for everyone.
(snip)
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/09/02/business/jobs-report-august-economy/a-cooling-job-market-is-expected-as-recession-fears-grow?smid=url-share
BootinUp
(47,085 posts)IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)I've taken flying lessons and flown a small plane. Landing is the hardest part and takes practice.
IronLionZion
(45,380 posts)Watch for conservative tears as they complain about this
moose65
(3,166 posts)Remember back during Obama's second term, when there had been 5 straight years of job growth, conservatives were always crying about the Labor Force Participation Rate. I guess it was all they had to cling to. Then, during the Trump years, not a peep about it, even though it was pretty much the same as it was during the Obama years.
Now, they don't even have THAT, as it went up last month! O the humanity!!
erpowers
(9,350 posts)I saw the news a few minutes agonas part of a news alert banner. My response upon seeing the numbers was dang.
BumRushDaShow
(128,520 posts)By Lauren Kaori Gurley
Updated September 2, 2022 at 9:03 a.m. EDT|Published September 2, 2022 at 8:32 a.m. EDT
The U.S. labor market added 315,000 jobs in August, hitting a 20-month streak in strong job growth thats powering an economy through ominously high inflation. The unemployment rate ticked up slightly to 3.7 percent, according to a monthly jobs report released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics on Friday, with 344,000 more people unemployed than the previous month.
The August jobs gains were the lowest monthly pick-up so far this year, but the labor market remains an area of strength for the economy, especially as the Federal Reserve raises interest rates to rein in blistering inflation. The biggest gains were in professional and business services, which added 68,000 jobs in August, with strong gains in computer systems design, management and technical consulting, and architectural and engineering services.
Employment in healthcare rose by 48,000 jobs, with notable additions in physicians, hospitals, and nursing and residential care facilities. Retail trade added 44,000 jobs and manufacturing continued to trend up by 22,000. Employment in leisure and hospitality saw little change after average monthly job gains of 90,000 in the first seven months of 2022. The industry still remains below its pre-pandemic levels.
The economy has more than recovered the 20 million jobs lost during the pandemic. Meanwhile, other indicators, such as a decline in economic output and persistent higher prices for just about everything, suggest a less rosy picture, raising questions on how much longer the hot job market can last.
(snip)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/09/02/august-jobs-report/
progree
(10,893 posts)From the Household Survey that produces these numbers (in the subject line) and more famously the unemployment rate and the labor force participation rate.
The officially unemployed in BLS-world are jobless people who sought work in the last 4 weeks. What economists generally say, so I says, is that the big jump in the labor force indicates that a lot of the jobless people resumed their job searches in August.
That's good, because in the 4 months thru July, the Employed dropped by 168,000 and the Labor Force dropped by 449,000.
So I'm delighted to see a big increase in both (Employed: +442,000, Labor Force: +768,000) in August.
Little known factoid: Labor Force = Employed + Unemployed
Unemployment rate = Unemployed / Labor Force
The below article is dated 9/1/22, before today's jobs report:
Why You Can't Trust Friday's Jobs Report, And What It Means For The S&P 500, Jed Graham, Investor's Business Daily, 9/1/22 (no paywall)
https://www.investors.com/news/economy/jobs-report-why-you-cant-trust-it-and-what-friday-data-means-for-sp500/?src=A00220
NONFARM PAYROLL JOBS (Establishment Survey and headline jobs number): https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001
monthly increases: https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CES0000000001?output_view=net_1mth
EMPLOYED (Household Survey): http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000
monthly increases: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000?output_view=net_1mth
LABOR FORCE (Household Survey): http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11000000
monthly increases: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11000000?output_view=net_1mth
BumRushDaShow
(128,520 posts)Except for odds and ends jobs during college and a year of subbing in the Philly School District before starting work in the federal government, at least in the government, we had the option to NOT withhold anything or could adjust the number of withholdings based on family size, etc. (and I'll assume that might be the case for private industry). Doing so obviously may mean a big tax bill in spring, assuming the deductions won't cover the AGI enough to put a dent in the tax bill.
But there are a number of people who prefer to do it that way so they have more money, paycheck to paycheck, when they need it most, and some even justify it by saying they "don't want Uncle Sam holding onto and making interest off of their money". Whether someone "pays it every paycheck" or waits until tax time, Uncle Sam is going to get his money, and cherry-picking revenues from withholdings without looking at the total revenue received by the government for that year, is IMHO, disingenuous.
progree
(10,893 posts)so this is a first time for me.
Maybe it's a case where the indicator is crappy, but the trend in it might be noteworthy, like job openings.
I got my ass chewed when I posted the JOLTS Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey yesterday, which featured a surprise uptick in job openings. I was told that most job postings are fake blah blah. I said maybe so, but that it is going higher or lower than expected might be useful information, not to mention that Fed Chair Powell talks a lot about job openings being too high blah blah tight labor market blah blah. And since he thinks its important, its important for that reason alone.
(And as an aside job postings are not the same as job openings -- job openings come from a survey of companies. Not all openings are posted.)
While one is free to withhold as much or as little taxes as one wants, in the private sector too unless something has changed since I last worked, there is a penalty + interest for substantial underpayment (one must pay in at least 90% of their actual taxes -- Or 100% of what they paid in taxes the previous year -- whichever is less -- in order to avoid penalties and interest). So there's that "discipline".
On the other hand, a lot of people have deliberately excessive large withholdings just for safety sake (avoiding any chance of a penalty and/or big tax bill in April), and because they love the big refund they get in February or March or April. It's kind of like a "savings account" where they "save up" through the year for a big springtime "bonus".
On an individual basis, withholdings are very erroneous, with different people having different philosophies about it as you indicate, and sometimes wildly inaccurate even when somebody is trying to withhold an amount that pays their taxes ... but as an aggregate average over 150 million payroll jobs, the wisdom of the crowd might come through. And as a trend, it might be a very good indicator.
As for total tax receipts -- that is problematical because a lot of the revenue received in 2022 are for 2021 taxes. And earlier. That part of it is backwards looking. Whereas withholdings (and estimated taxes) in 2022 are for paying 2022 taxes, which are based on 2022 income.
This article compares withholding and wages saying they are quite well correlated, showing a graph over 14 years
https://taxtracking.com/growth-in-withholding-taxes-is-starting-to-slow/
BumRushDaShow
(128,520 posts)is that since the "models" have been near-complete misses ever since the pandemic began (although they have gotten a bit better recently), and are still being impacted by the economic whiplash as a result of it... and now you have the war between Ukraine and Russia, they are trying to find some other "indicator/factor" that can be looked at that might be independent of what became a 2-year "shock" to the system.
The problem that I considered about using that as an indicator is that the pandemic brought about a huge demand for what is considered "gig work'. E.g.,
Report By Ben Zipperer, Celine McNicholas, Margaret Poydock, Daniel Schneider, and Kristen Harknett June 1, 2022
Download PDF
Press release
While the concept of nontraditional, short-term, and contract work has been around since well before the digital age, it wasnt until the 2010s that digital platform companies like Uber, DoorDash, Instacart, and TaskRabbit began to rise to prominence and shape the way we define gig work today.
In the most basic terms, gig work can be defined as work done by individuals who are classified as self-employed, freelancers, or independent contractors. However, in recent years the term gig work has become synonymous with working for digital platform companies, including driving for ride-share apps, making deliveries for restaurants, shopping or delivering groceries, and performing errands or household tasks. In this use, gig work is a misnomer that helps companies propagate the myth that these workers have more independence and control over their work than they actually do.
(snip)
https://www.epi.org/publication/gig-worker-survey/
So by doing what are essentially part-time "gigs", the final income from these may mean you don't have to file a federal tax return, and you would probably not have much if anything "withheld". So a restaurant that is now doing "take out and delivery" (where previously they were an eat-in spot), then there is a need for regular delivery people ( "Job openings" ) - whether through a partnered delivery service or as an employee/contractor for that business. However these types of jobs are not like FT 40 hr/wk jobs.
Otherwise their assertion is that BLM is "doing it wrong" and is fudging numbers.
progree
(10,893 posts)so I wouldn't think there was a big disproportionate increase in gig workers during that time. In comparing 2022 to 2019, yes for sure.
https://www.investors.com/news/economy/jobs-report-why-you-cant-trust-it-and-what-friday-data-means-for-sp500/?src=A00220
I didn't see any accusations or implications of fudging. (Edit: OK, he did use the word "guess" as far as the Birth-Death estimate of new business formations which is unfair).
There are plenty of other signs of slowdown -- two back to back quarters of negative GDP growth, the BLS's Household Survey of Employment notwithstanding the sizable increase in August, inflation-adjusted personal income, and inflation-adjusted wages, yada. Note, I said slowdown, not recession. And frankly I'm happy as hell because maybe Powell will be more moderate on his rate hikes.
Household Survey Employment
https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS12000000?output_view=net_1mth
April May June July Aug, in thousands
-353 321 -315 179 442
Up only 274,000 over 5 months ( 55k/month )
LABOR FORCE (Household Survey):
monthly increases: http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11000000?output_view=net_1mth
April May June July Aug, in thousands
-363 330 -353 -63 786
Up only 337,000 over 5 months ( 67k/month )
BumRushDaShow
(128,520 posts)If, as seems likely, the Labor Department is overstating job gains, when will the government correct the figures? Maybe in a year. Every August, the Labor Department announces preliminary revisions to a full year of data through the prior March. But the divergence between strong payroll growth and the soft tax and household survey data only began in April or May.
Plus what you mention in your reply title -
And what happened between "May and August" ?
A lot of school districts had to try to find temps for everything the past year - teachers, bus drivers, cafeteria staff, maintenance staff, etc.
I know way back in the day, which I know is still the case here in Philly, subs were paid at a fixed per-diem rate (and were on-call), and then after x number of days of doing that (didn't have to be consecutive days), the daily pay would increase. All the wage taxes were withheld and that work did actually count towards SS work hours. But then come the end of the school year? The end. At least until September.
I know with the covid nightmare hitting the schools and teachers/students being quarantined and out of school for days, there had to be some subs/temp aides brought in to backfill the absences. This year is probably the first full year when most schools came back for "in person" learning for most of the school year.
The previous year, the schools were slowly trickling back to "in person" in the spring, and of course the year before that (initial year of the pandemic), much of it was "virtual" or "hybrid", so all the support staff were furloughed.
progree
(10,893 posts)The withholding numbers are not seasonally adjusted. So I decided to look at the unseasonally adjusted job numbers:
https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/CEU0500000001&output_view=pct_1mth
Apr May June July Aug in thousands
+984 +811 +1294 +550 +57
Last 3 months: 1,901,000 = 634k/mo average. Last 4 months: 2,712k = 678k/mo average.
So doesn't support a picture of much of the workforce not working in the summer. School may be out, but people are on net getting a lot of jobs in the summer. Payroll jobs, so there would be withholding there.
And about the Household survey's Employed (seasonally adjusted) only increasing by 55k/month average over the last 5 months?
And Labor Force growth only 67k/month?
While the headline payroll jobs numbers up 387k/month?
Or 2 quarters of back-to-back GDP declines and declining real wages?
I will have to dig for that tax withholding information to see if the same pattern holds in earlier years of a big dropoff over the summer
I got this far:
https://fsapps.fiscal.treasury.gov/dts/files/22083100.txt
Table IV Federal Tax Deposits -- 1st line is: Withheld Income and Employment Taxes.
https://fiscal.treasury.gov/reports-statements/dts/
This has it but only for 8/31/22 and the month of August and the Fiscal Year. "Withheld Income and Employment Taxes $ 11,764 $ 253,447 $ 2,875,619"
I'm sure there must be more consolidated information so I don't have to look at these monthly one by one and do a lot of spreadsheet tabulations. E.g. as starters to see if in 2019 (last pre-pandemic year) there was a big slowdown in withholding between May and August, and likewise earlier years.
BumRushDaShow
(128,520 posts)and they played a Bloomberg business report that included some remarks about "the great resignation" and specifically noted "teachers" (and had reported on a June AFT survey). Doing a quick search, I found a Bloomberg article that came out this morning -
Part I: Why Teachers Are Quitting
By Nic Cuerolo, Olivia Rockeman, and Ella Ceron
September 2, 2022 at 5:00 AM EDT
(snip)
For decades, Americas educators have said they wouldve abandoned the job long ago were it not for their devotion to their students. But after a demanding and demoralizing two years that included Zoom schooling, culture wars, and shootings, those threats have finally become real. A Gallup Poll in February showed that K-12 educators were the most burned-out segment of the US labor force.
Now teachers are walking out by the hundreds of thousands, vowing never to return. A study by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) in March found that 44% of public schools reported teaching vacancies. By LinkedIns calculations, the number of teachers who quit in June was almost 41% higher than a year earlier.
Although some school districts managed to fill their vacancies to start the school year, many in rural areas and those serving low-income families are still having trouble doing so. In some cases, schools are even allowing veterans and other noncredentialed workers to step in as teachers and, in extreme cases, reducing the school week to four days.
(snip)
Its only going to get worse. Almost 2 in 5 teachers plan to quit in the next two years, according to a June survey of members of the American Federation of Teachers union. Chief among the reasons are salaries that havent kept up with inflation, student behavioral problems that have gotten worse during the pandemic, and a lack of respect as schools have become the latest political battleground. A report from the National Education Association found that starting salaries averaged $41,770 for the 2020-21 school year, a 4% decrease from the prior year when adjusted for inflation and the lowest in at least a decade.
(snip)
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2022-america-teachers-great-resignation/
The above is talks about educators "walking out by the hundreds of thousands". That actually sounds significant to me!
And sorry you found yourself in the weeds stuck with monthly tabulations.
progree
(10,893 posts)unseasonally adjusted headline nonfarm payrolls establishment survey that so many are defending, ok. Just adds to my suspicions, particularly when the other job and economy indicators are not anything like that. (seasonally adjusted: 380k/month)
More in line with
the Household survey's Employed (seasonally adjusted) only increasing by 55k/month average over the last 5 months
(157k/month last 4 months)
And Labor Force growth only 67k/month over the last 5 months
(175k/month last 4 months)
The teachers aren't finding other work? Ones that don't involve tax withholding?
BumRushDaShow
(128,520 posts)I think many who left were actually retiring, and if they did get "bored" might be doing more ad-hoc type of work.
Decades ago there were "warnings" about boomers going out at 65 (and then 66, and then 67), and that was supposed to "start" around 2011, but those warnings never panned out... until the pandemic hit as boomers were staying in the workplace longer than expected!
This is an excerpt from the Equity and Justice Outlook chapter in the 2018-2019 NAIS Trendbook.
By Caroline G. Blackwell and Amada Torres
About a quarter of todays workforce are part of the 74-million strong baby-boom generation. The oldest boomers turned 72 in 2018, and the youngest are in their early 50s. About 41 million are still working.
These aging trends will affect K-12 education. In 2011, the U.S. Department of Education predicted that 1.6 million teachers would retire within the decade. Researchers have been discussing teacher shortages across the country, particularly in subjects such as special education, mathematics, science, and bilingual/English learner education and in locales with lower wages and poorer working conditions.
Projections of shortages are based on declines in enrollment in teacher education programs, student enrollment growth, efforts to reduce student-teacher ratios, and the ongoing high attrition rates among teachers. Around the country, states are also reporting shortages in professional roles outside the classroom. School counselors, speech and language pathologists, librarians, social workers, and general administrators are among the educators in short supply.
However, all types of schools may not be affected in the same way. On average, teachers at charter schools tend to be younger (37.4 years old) than their counterparts in traditional public schools (42.6 years old) and in private schools (43.8 years old). Principals tend to be older on average than the teaching workforce, and the average age for private school principals (51.7 years) is higher than for public school principals (48 years).
(snip)
https://www.nais.org/articles/pages/books/trendbook-excerpt-baby-boomers-retirement-may-create-a-labor-shortage/
I will say that one must remember that there were also several "stimulus" bills that were passed that are funding all sorts of things including "infrastructure" projects, and the way this year has gone with the climate extremes of flooding and wildfires, there's a market for cleanup and rebuilding.
So I think for now, there is back-filling/re-hiring of the jobs lost due to the pandemic and supply chain issues (e.g., you had car manufacturers who had to shut down plants and/or do temp furloughs due to a lack of parts, including due to those ever-elusive microchips), plus you have the creation of "new" jobs in healthcare support (testing, vaccinations, manufacturing of new drugs and biologics, etc). I know the sector reporting is sortof generic, but some of these things may be buried in those categories.
progree
(10,893 posts)grand nephews and nieces .. regarding the teacher situation.
In other news: S&P 500 closed 18.2% down from its January all-time high, a 1.1% drop from yesterday (it was up 1.1% or so for awhile this morning, after the jobs report came out, supposedly because traders anticipated a more modest rate increase thanks to what I call a "Goldilocks" jobs report (not too hot and not too cold).
And then the market reversed gears. So we're close to back to "bear market territory".
BumRushDaShow
(128,520 posts)Earlier they seemed upbeat and figuring on a more modest rate hike (instead of a 0.75%). I still think it will be 0.5%.
At least oil (WTI) closed a few dollars below $90/bbl but then Russia is toying with Nordstream 1.
And I hear ya about the grand-nieces and nephews. But kids can be resilient. They adapt to the environment around them because that's all they know. Meanwhile we are continually comparing with "what it used to be like", and in that case, time seems to exaggerate and distort that memory.
LetMyPeopleVote
(144,939 posts)progree
(10,893 posts)Alexandra Semenova, Yahoo Finance
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stock-market-news-live-updates-september-2-2022-094823322.html
. . . Data from the Labor Department published Friday morning showed nonfarm payrolls grew by 315,000 in August while the unemployment rate rose to 3.7%. Economists had expected job gains would total 298,000 with the unemployment rate expected to hold at 3.5%.
Wage gains moderated somewhat last month, with average hourly earnings rising 0.3% month-on-month and 5.2% over the prior year. Both readings were 0.1% below expectations.
The biggest highlight from Friday's jobs data, however, was the increase in participation, with 786,000 Americans entering the workforce last month and pushing the labor force participation rate to 62.4%, its highest since March 2020.
"The slower pace of payroll gains in August, together with the big rebound in the labour force, and the more modest increase in wages, would seem to favor a smaller 50bp rate hike from the Fed next month, rather than a 75bp increase, but officials will put a lot more weight on Augusts CPI data, due the week after next," Michael Pearce, senior U.S. economist at Capital Economics, wrote in a note on Friday.
The rise in the unemployment rate is because a lot more people looked for work in August than in July (you are counted as unemployed in BLS-land only if you had looked for work sometime in the last 4 weeks, among other criteria). Please see my #18 for that song-and-dance.
progree
(10,893 posts)Alexandra Semenova, Yahoo Finance
(same link as above #25, no difference in content except to mention the stock market reversal)
Doesn't give a reason why it suddenly nose-dived. S&P 500 is down 0.65%, Dow is down 0.56% (177 points) as I post this. The S&P 500 was up more than 1% an hour ago, sigh.