Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spotbird

(7,583 posts)
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 10:17 PM Jan 2012

Gas supplier dumps abortion provider

Welsco Industrial Gas and Welding Supply, which has supplied oxygen and nitrous gas to the Little Rock Family Planning Clinic for a decade, told the clinic in early January it would no longer sell to them and demanded its tanks back after an abortion protester filmed a company truck delivering gas to the clinic and posted for a time on YouTube.

...

In response, Welsco manager Aaron Campbell called the police, and officers visited the clinic, at 4 Office Park Drive, Jan. 6. Williams explained to police that she had a contract with Welsco and would be happy to return the tanks when they are empty but not sooner. The police said fine, made out an information report, and left. They later returned to tell her that Welsco was offering a refund. Williams declined the refund.

Now, Little Rock Family Planning is seeking a new oxygen and nitrous supplier. One company made one delivery but then backed out, saying they wanted to avoid controversy.
[link:http://www.arktimes.com/ArkansasBlog/archives/2012/01/19/gas-supplier-dumps-abortion-provider|
72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gas supplier dumps abortion provider (Original Post) spotbird Jan 2012 OP
they need federal marshal escorts cap Jan 2012 #1
A better solution would be a truck with no name on its side happyslug Jan 2012 #5
Truck could still be followed back to the distribution yard.... PavePusher Jan 2012 #63
But in such cases someone has to follow the truck. happyslug Jan 2012 #65
Oxygen and N2O do not burn or explode. Bill O-Rights Jan 2012 #64
OXYGEN DOES NOT EXPLODE? Yes, it just leads to "Rapid oxidation" i.e. BURNING happyslug Jan 2012 #66
Yeah, they are so dangerous they're commonly breathed by humans. Bill O-Rights Jan 2012 #68
Humans tend not to have a pilot light inside them. hughee99 Jan 2012 #69
The OSHA link does not call oxygen "flammable", it says to keep it AWAY from flammable stuff. Bill O-Rights Jan 2012 #70
You are correct, hughee99 Jan 2012 #71
Yes. I wasn't meaning to be confrontational, I just like for information to be correct and Bill O-Rights Jan 2012 #72
it is turning into one very hateful country Angry Dragon Jan 2012 #2
turning into? Drale Jan 2012 #7
getting worse?? Angry Dragon Jan 2012 #8
I have ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #10
No, they didn't, really Occulus Jan 2012 #14
There are people around here who just kind of The Doctor. Jan 2012 #19
Like racial hatred is only in South ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #35
So, you didn't read his post. The Doctor. Jan 2012 #49
I did ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #50
Then you must have comprehension issues. The Doctor. Jan 2012 #53
Why don't you use your tardis and do some original reseach ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2012 #55
There are thread trolls who bait people into arguments here. Kolesar Jan 2012 #52
Hatred is not unique to the southern states. Refer to this hate map compiled by SPLC. Arkansas Granny Jan 2012 #21
South bashing is pretty ugly, too. AlbertCat Jan 2012 #27
Why is it so difficult for so many people to read and comprehend a post before responding to it? The Doctor. Jan 2012 #54
Did you miss this this sentence in the post that I replied to? Arkansas Granny Jan 2012 #56
Are you serious? The Doctor. Jan 2012 #58
There are none so blind as those that will not see. Arkansas Granny Jan 2012 #60
Yep, pretty much what I thought. The Doctor. Jan 2012 #61
During the desegregation of the 70's and the forced busing... WCGreen Jan 2012 #45
The Red Sox had problems wooing/pursuing black FAs well into the early 1990s... Chan790 Jan 2012 #48
The South didn't have Sundown towns, the Midwest did obamanut2012 Jan 2012 #67
the economy must be booming! flobee1 Jan 2012 #3
This is what domestic terrorism looks like. nt Xipe Totec Jan 2012 #4
+1 hamsterjill Jan 2012 #24
we're not supposed to mention that Blue_Tires Jan 2012 #30
That principle seems to apply here, too nxylas Jan 2012 #42
Because teabaggers The Wizard Jan 2012 #46
And do we know that he was carrying a high-powered weapon? nxylas Jan 2012 #51
Interestingly enough - clinics are hesitant to use the word "terrorism" ehrnst Jan 2012 #33
Did I just read that a Welding supply shop, a gas supplier, is practicing medicine? Trillo Jan 2012 #6
Same people supply medical oxyegen Mopar151 Jan 2012 #16
Why are the Police getting involved? obamanut2012 Jan 2012 #9
Because a death threat is being implied. boppers Jan 2012 #11
That's what I wondered - a show to appease someone threatening them? ehrnst Jan 2012 #34
The first visit by the police, if they were told that the clinic was keeping petronius Jan 2012 #59
"Controversy" is not abiding by the law slay Jan 2012 #12
And I'm willing to bet polmaven Jan 2012 #18
the clinic should sue on the basis of Equal Protection Amendment wordpix Jan 2012 #22
But this welding company is a private one not govt entity alp227 Jan 2012 #36
Sounds to me Welsco is violating the law. /nt still_one Jan 2012 #13
Good Grief dballance Jan 2012 #15
The point of pride on on their website is being woman-owned. Sigh. coffeenap Jan 2012 #17
Interesting - why ask for the tanks back? Just because of the video? ehrnst Jan 2012 #20
there may have been a threat that wordpix Jan 2012 #23
I wouldn't doubt it. It's interesting that they called the police ehrnst Jan 2012 #25
A quick google map view shows no outside tanks. ehrnst Jan 2012 #32
Welsco owns the tanks, more than likely Mopar151 Jan 2012 #26
Ah - so maybe they called, and the clinic said they hadn't emptied the tanks. ehrnst Jan 2012 #31
FYI Phone numbers BlueToTheBone Jan 2012 #28
Call. Call. Call... If they're that susceptible to fear and pressure, call... call... call... cyberpj Jan 2012 #41
Join my new religion dangin Jan 2012 #29
This is the way the people make their opinions known and normally we are in favor of such actions. crim son Jan 2012 #37
The terrorists are winning. SalviaBlue Jan 2012 #38
One thing to do is have the Gas Supply co next to the clinic Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Jan 2012 #39
IMPORTANT NOTE: At end of article - "...state anti-choice legislation doubled in 2011 over 2010 and cyberpj Jan 2012 #40
It's a shame they don't videotape all those Smilo Jan 2012 #43
At least there was no violence. marias23 Jan 2012 #44
I am soooooo tired of crazy people. nt valerief Jan 2012 #47
This will really get you... jmowreader Jan 2012 #57
It's the crazy eyes again! tawadi Jan 2012 #62
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
5. A better solution would be a truck with no name on its side
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 10:53 PM
Jan 2012

The issue here is NOT potential harm via an act of violence, but other customers cancelling orders do to the fact they make deliveries to the abortion clinic.

Someone in the Clinic will have to buy a truck go to the company, rent the tanks and then haul them to the clinic. This would be a cheaper solution then US Marshall escort, through the 3/4 to one ton trucks needed at not cheap to buy, run or maintain. An alternative solution is for the Company to have one truck that is unmarked that makes such deliveries.

As to the actual cancellation of the Contract, the issue as to the present tanks is that they have been paid for so the Clinic has the right to use them till it is time to refill them. On the other hand, unless some sort of long term contract had been signed by both parities. which I doubt, either side has the right to cancel the contract at any time.

Now, what all that is needed is for this controversy to die down and the supplier may resume the deliveries, but the Clinic can NOT count on that and should look into other solutions.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
63. Truck could still be followed back to the distribution yard....
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 05:49 PM
Jan 2012

and the bottles are generally labeled with the owner/distro company, and various inspection dates/serial numbers/inventory control markings.

Pretty difficult to make this an anonymous procedure.

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
65. But in such cases someone has to follow the truck.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 09:06 AM
Jan 2012

The problem appears to be, someone saw a truck with the company's name on it dropping off the containers. If no sign find out whose truck it is someone has to follow the truck (technically the Police can e the license plate, but in most states it is illegal to use the plate to get the name of owner of the plate UNLESS you can justify the need, i.e. Ticket or accident).

Most people will NOT take the time to follow the truck.

As to the containers, while the providers name are on the containers, an enclosed bed would prevent people from seeing who owns the container while the container is on the truck. In the clinic, the clinic can store the gas in an approved enclosed storage area. That would prevent anyone but an employee from seeing whose name is on the container.

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
66. OXYGEN DOES NOT EXPLODE? Yes, it just leads to "Rapid oxidation" i.e. BURNING
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 09:16 AM
Jan 2012

Oxygen is one of the most dangerous gases, it is required when anything "Burns", in a 100% oxygen environmental, everything can burn, even steel.

N2O is of a lesser concern, but still able to appropriated people by driving out all other gases (i.e. No Oxygen left so people suffocate).

Just pointing out these are two dangerous gases/

 

Bill O-Rights

(40 posts)
68. Yeah, they are so dangerous they're commonly breathed by humans.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 07:24 PM
Jan 2012

I'm a chemical engineer, I do know a little about it.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
69. Humans tend not to have a pilot light inside them.
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 09:18 PM
Jan 2012

In any case, OSHA seems to think it's pretty flammable

http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_id=9750&p_table=STANDARDS

The folks on Apollo 1 may disagree with you as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_1

I recall a chemistry experiment in HS where water was separated into Oxygen and hydrogen and used to fill balloons. Neither handled the bunsen burner very well.

 

Bill O-Rights

(40 posts)
70. The OSHA link does not call oxygen "flammable", it says to keep it AWAY from flammable stuff.
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 06:20 PM
Jan 2012

Your electrolysis of water created hydrogen which certainly will lift a balloon and can easily be ignited in the presence of an oxidizer. Oxygen can fill a balloon but it will be much heavier than air which is mostly nitrogen which is 4 units lighter than oxygen. Whoever decided to keep the space capsule environment oxygen-rich was an idiot, I predicted that tragedy as inevitable from the get-go.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
71. You are correct,
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 06:52 PM
Jan 2012

While pure oxygen itself isn't flammable, it is an oxidizer. Unless you plan to store it in an area with no flammable materials it can be devastating if a flame is introduce, thus making it quite dangerous.

If a truck were to catch fire, also having a tank (or tanks) full of oxygen in the truck would be an issue. The danger, as you said, isn't the oxygen igniting, it's the truck igniting and the oxygen being present as well.

 

Bill O-Rights

(40 posts)
72. Yes. I wasn't meaning to be confrontational, I just like for information to be correct and
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 07:38 PM
Jan 2012

reasonably comprehensive.


Occulus

(20,599 posts)
14. No, they didn't, really
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 03:51 AM
Jan 2012

Why are all the so-called "historians" on DU suddenly getting shit wrong left and right? One even blatantly misrepresented events of the previous afternoon on the day of the SOPA blackout!

Events in Chicago and Boston, taken cumulatively, will not ever equal the hatred of minorities in general that emanates from the region of the country commonly referred to as "the South".

Jesus, man. Do you think we all fell off the truck yesterday?

 

The Doctor.

(17,266 posts)
19. There are people around here who just kind of
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 08:42 AM
Jan 2012

make shit up.

They want the world to be a 'certain way', so they just say it is. That way, if no one contradicts them, they can believe it.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
35. Like racial hatred is only in South
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 12:07 PM
Jan 2012

Its everywhere...NYC historically was no better than Birmingham. Different targets, different methods, but no less hateful.

 

The Doctor.

(17,266 posts)
53. Then you must have comprehension issues.
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 03:04 PM
Jan 2012

I'll leave the point about possessives and declaratives for another time. You also need to look up the meaning of 'specious' as you have obviously used it incorrectly.

So your argument is that there are as many or more incidents of racially motivated violence in the Northern states than in the Southern states?



Because if you actually understood what the poster was saying and you disagree with him, then that is the only position that you can be supporting right now. If that is the case, then there is nothing 'specious' about any of my posts. It is apparent that you simply want to believe something, and since you have nothing to back it up you simply state it as fact.

That is exactly the definition of 'specious'.

You may also want to look up "projection".

I'm done with you here.


OE: You can start your education here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_racial_violence_in_the_United_States

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
55. Why don't you use your tardis and do some original reseach
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 04:58 PM
Jan 2012

Racial hatreds have been prevalent at different time in the US in many locales, not just the south, which is what many here are unaware of. Some of it goes back to the colonies some of it fairly recent. Those who focus on the south are either ignorant or choosing to be blind to history.

Does your tardis have a "No Irish Need Apply" sign on it?

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)
52. There are thread trolls who bait people into arguments here.
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 07:55 AM
Jan 2012

I am speaking broadly, of course. I am not talking about anybody on the welding gas thread, of course!!!

Arkansas Granny

(31,513 posts)
21. Hatred is not unique to the southern states. Refer to this hate map compiled by SPLC.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 10:34 AM
Jan 2012
http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/hate-map

Hatred is ugly and there is no place that is immune to it. South bashing is pretty ugly, too.
 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
27. South bashing is pretty ugly, too.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 11:00 AM
Jan 2012

Really.

When bussing 1st came on the scene... where did they burn buses? It wasn't the South.

And I know they just LOVE latinos and asians in CA! Always have!

Seen what's going on in AZ lately? How about RI and that atheist student?

The South is just where Slavery was legal and institutionalized a long while ago. Other than that, its no different from ND or PA.

The definition of "prejudice" is not "The way back people are treated in the South".

 

The Doctor.

(17,266 posts)
54. Why is it so difficult for so many people to read and comprehend a post before responding to it?
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 03:29 PM
Jan 2012

This may be difficult for you to digest, but the poster did not say that 'hatred is unique to the Southern states'. Nowhere in any of the above posts has anyone suggested anything of the sort, yet somehow you and others get it in to your heads that they did... even though there are no words to that effect.

What is wrong with so many people around here that they can't be bothered to read the words that are presumably right in front of them?

Arkansas Granny

(31,513 posts)
56. Did you miss this this sentence in the post that I replied to?
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 05:05 PM
Jan 2012

"Events in Chicago and Boston, taken cumulatively, will not ever equal the hatred of minorities in general that emanates from the region of the country commonly referred to as "the South"."

I have no problem with reading comprehension and since those words were presumably right in front of you, I'm surprised that you couldn't be bothered to read them.

South bashing is a common pasttime among some who post on DU. Those of us who actually live in the South get tired of being painted with the broad brush of bigotry.

 

The Doctor.

(17,266 posts)
58. Are you serious?
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 02:10 AM
Jan 2012

I ask you again, "Where did anyone say that hatred is unique to the Southern states?", because you said this: "Hatred is not unique to the southern states." as though someone said so.

That's YOUR Claim. Now BACK IT UP or become an adult and admit that you were wrong.

Given the history around here, I know what you'll do.
 

The Doctor.

(17,266 posts)
61. Yep, pretty much what I thought.
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 01:37 PM
Jan 2012

Learn to listen to yourself while you're learning to read the posts you respond to.

WCGreen

(45,558 posts)
45. During the desegregation of the 70's and the forced busing...
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 06:06 PM
Jan 2012

Boston was ground zero for racial disharmony.

They were also, I believe, the last baseball team to have a black player.

Just pointing that out.

I agree, that does pale in comparison to what is still going on even 150 years after the Civil War.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
48. The Red Sox had problems wooing/pursuing black FAs well into the early 1990s...
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 08:47 PM
Jan 2012

on account of the city of Boston's racist reputation.

I grew up near Hartford, about 90 minutes to the south of Boston. I have family in both Boston and all over the South (NC, FL, AL, TX) who I got dragged to visit a lot growing up (1979-1996)...I heard a lot more use of ni**er and a lot more jokes about killing black people in Boston than I ever heard in the South.

obamanut2012

(26,064 posts)
67. The South didn't have Sundown towns, the Midwest did
Mon Jan 23, 2012, 10:23 AM
Jan 2012

And, how about how Indiana was literally ruled by the Klan for a long time?

The South had slavery and Jim Crow and desegregation and Loving vs. Virginia, but lots of other places had alot of very bad things, too, but they are rarely spotlighted. It is almost always "The South."

This happened in Boston, 1976, and the crowd cheered:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Soiling_of_Old_Glory.jpg



Hate is all over.

flobee1

(870 posts)
3. the economy must be booming!
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 10:39 PM
Jan 2012

They obviously no longer need money to make the o2 business run-lets all join in and help them become profit free

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
42. That principle seems to apply here, too
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 02:12 PM
Jan 2012

I'm aware that there is a history of domestic terrorism on the right, but not all right-wing political activism falls into that category, and I don't think this does. As a thought exercise, imagine they had been supplying natural gas for cooking to Maurice's BBQ, the South Carolina restaurant chain that has attracted controversy by proudly displaying the Confederate battle flag over all its premises. A liberal activist films the trucks going in and posts the video on YouTube in an attempt to persuade the company to stop doing business with Maurice's. Would that be domestic terrorism? If not, how is it any different, except that one is in a "good" cause and one is in a "bad" cause?

The Wizard

(12,541 posts)
46. Because teabaggers
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 06:14 PM
Jan 2012

carry high powered weapons with the understanding that they'll use them. A round from a high powered rifle through an oxygen tank could trigger a large explosion.
The radical right is radically wrong and very likely dangerous. You don't have to be smart to pull a trigger or sane to carry a high powered rifle. Blowing up abortion clinics is nothing new, especially in the Confederacy.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
51. And do we know that he was carrying a high-powered weapon?
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 06:46 AM
Jan 2012

Or is that just an assumption? And even if he was, he didn't shoot the oxygen tank. Stripping people of their right to protest based on what they "might" do is a recipe for tyranny.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
33. Interestingly enough - clinics are hesitant to use the word "terrorism"
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 11:52 AM
Jan 2012

because many insurance companies specifically exclude "acts of terrorism" now to avoid covering anything like what happened on 9/11, in terms of damage to a building.

Trillo

(9,154 posts)
6. Did I just read that a Welding supply shop, a gas supplier, is practicing medicine?
Thu Jan 19, 2012, 11:03 PM
Jan 2012

Who knew. Next time I have serious aches or pains and may think I need an emergency room visit, I should instead go to the welding supplier to get some laughing gas.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
11. Because a death threat is being implied.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 02:15 AM
Jan 2012

Someone is stalking, and filming, the delivery trucks for the only abortion provider in the *entire state* of Arkansas, and then posting it on youtube.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
34. That's what I wondered - a show to appease someone threatening them?
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 11:57 AM
Jan 2012

If they asked for their tanks back, the clinic would have told them that they would need to use the gas in the tanks - which they had paid for - prior to returning them.

If the tanks are the property of Welsco, they might have decided to push the issues by calling the police, saying that Welsco had their property.

So, when the clinic explained to the police that they had not used all the gas yet, the police left. Hence the offer for the refund.

They've been supplying this place for a decade, and suddenly they have to get their tanks out NOW, instead of simply collecting them when they're empty, and cancelling further sales.

I have to wonder if there was a direct threat.

petronius

(26,602 posts)
59. The first visit by the police, if they were told that the clinic was keeping
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 02:14 AM
Jan 2012

the gas company's property without permission, was appropriate.

The return visit, to carry the message of the offered refund, was improper IMO and merits some complaint and review...

 

slay

(7,670 posts)
12. "Controversy" is not abiding by the law
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 03:04 AM
Jan 2012

these companies should have to supply to them just like every other fucking company they supply to - and they can blame it on THE LAW if any pissed off right-to-lifer wants to throw a temper tantrum. i'm so sick of women's rights being trampled on by - for the most part - hillbilly redneck idiots!


polmaven

(9,463 posts)
18. And I'm willing to bet
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 08:31 AM
Jan 2012

they are MALE idiots. *****Never mind...just read the post below saying they are actually FEMALE IDIOTS!****

Absolutely astonishing!

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
22. the clinic should sue on the basis of Equal Protection Amendment
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 10:45 AM
Jan 2012

Then again, I'm sure the clinic doesn't want any incident by some idiot RW pro-life nut, and escalating the issue will bring the clinic more publicity and thus, more RW attn.

These RW prolifers are a real menace. I agree, call for fed escorts and check those tanks regularly.

alp227

(32,015 posts)
36. But this welding company is a private one not govt entity
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 12:21 PM
Jan 2012

so do they not have the right to choose their clients under the 1st amendment freedom of assembly clause? If the company really breached contract, a lawsuit is meritorious.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
15. Good Grief
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 05:07 AM
Jan 2012

Obviously women are going to start having to seek medical care in back room clinics again. Yep, lets have them go to dirty, unregulated clinics. That will be so much more healthy.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
20. Interesting - why ask for the tanks back? Just because of the video?
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 09:36 AM
Jan 2012

They had to have known that a family planning clinic would use surgical gas for surgery, and that would include abortion, among other things.

They are acting like they had no idea this was going, and were outraged at the idea that the gas they had already sold them were being used for this purpose.

They could have simply said that they were not going to do business with them further, but behaved in this odd fashion. I wonder what is really behind their response.

wordpix

(18,652 posts)
23. there may have been a threat that
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 10:48 AM
Jan 2012

involves the tanks. If there are gas tanks outside, an incident could occur with these RW nuts "in charge."

They may as well put on their white robes, these pro-life nuts are the same as KKK.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
25. I wouldn't doubt it. It's interesting that they called the police
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 10:51 AM
Jan 2012

to try to confiscate the tanks - I wonder if that may have been to appease threats?

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
32. A quick google map view shows no outside tanks.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 11:49 AM
Jan 2012

So I'd imagine that they're the small oxygen and nitrous tanks.

Mopar151

(9,978 posts)
26. Welsco owns the tanks, more than likely
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 10:59 AM
Jan 2012

Leasing tanks is very common practice. Many business that use industrial gases have wide variations in usage, and number of tanks required - so if extra tanks are needed, the business just has to pay the (monthly) lease on the extra tanks, and the gas actually used.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
31. Ah - so maybe they called, and the clinic said they hadn't emptied the tanks.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 11:47 AM
Jan 2012

I'm just curious about why the rush to get the tanks back - and sending the police.

BlueToTheBone

(3,747 posts)
28. FYI Phone numbers
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 11:12 AM
Jan 2012

for your perusal.

800 East Roosevelt Road Little Rock, AR 72206-2411
(501) 372-2252
is listed in google
and this number was given to me as the hq
501 771 1204

They don't like talking about this. I was hung up on by both parties. I'd love to know your experience!

 

cyberpj

(10,794 posts)
41. Call. Call. Call... If they're that susceptible to fear and pressure, call... call... call...
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 02:12 PM
Jan 2012

I don't care if they do hang up (as they did with me) - the sheer number of calls should make SOME impression on them!

dangin

(148 posts)
29. Join my new religion
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 11:28 AM
Jan 2012

Hi, I'm the founder of Scientific Paganism. We are closely aligned with Pastafarians, metaphysical naturalists, and the worshippers of the invisible pink unicorn.

Our faith holds science and the natural world to be the source of all spiritual power. One of the primary tenants of this faith is that each individual's body is their temple. Women who profess our faith have a RELIGION BASED RIGHT to medical procedures for the upkeep of their temple. Preventing a woman from exercising her religious rights over her body is a wholly illegal thing, because, it is part of her constitutionally protected faith.

Join up, no tithing required. Be a good person. Thou art god.

crim son

(27,464 posts)
37. This is the way the people make their opinions known and normally we are in favor of such actions.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 01:03 PM
Jan 2012

Aren't we? If the situation was reversed and we were the ones forcing a boycott of a business owned by an outspoken racist or misogynist, we'd be applauding.

I don't know what the answer is, but what's good for the goose is, as they say, good for the gander too.

39. One thing to do is have the Gas Supply co next to the clinic
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 01:57 PM
Jan 2012

In this picture I see on the left is a welding Supply Company and on the right an Family Planning Clinic.

 

cyberpj

(10,794 posts)
40. IMPORTANT NOTE: At end of article - "...state anti-choice legislation doubled in 2011 over 2010 and
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 02:04 PM
Jan 2012
- and 2012 is expected to be worse."

From the original post's article:
RELATED: The Pro-Choice America Foundation reported that state anti-choice legislation doubled in 2011 over 2010 and 2012 is expected to be worse. Its annual rundown on the status of women's (dwindling) reproductive rights is here.

http://www.prochoiceamerica.org/government-and-you/who-decides/







Smilo

(1,944 posts)
43. It's a shame they don't videotape all those
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 05:35 PM
Jan 2012

..... "anti-abortion" women sneaking in and out of the clinics after their abortions.

Bloody hypocrites make me sick.

marias23

(379 posts)
44. At least there was no violence.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 06:01 PM
Jan 2012

It's a pity that people can't mind their own business, but at least in this tactic there was no violence. Lets hope they find a new supply.

jmowreader

(50,552 posts)
57. This will really get you...
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 02:09 AM
Jan 2012


This is Angela Harrison. She owns the welding supply company, "the largest woman-owned industrial gas and welding supply distributor in the United States," that's doing this.

Fortunately, there seem to be quite a few suppliers of oxygen and nitrous oxide in Little Rock.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gas supplier dumps aborti...