HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » Judge Dismisses Ethics Co...

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 04:57 PM

Judge Dismisses Ethics Complaints Accusing Aileen Cannon of Bias in Trump Special Master Order

Source: National Law Journal

A federal judge dismissed a handful of ethics complaints that were filed against U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon over her handling of former President Donald Trump’s challenge to the seizure of documents from his Mar-a-Lago home.

The complaints filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit accuse Cannon of political bias in her decision to appoint a special master to review the seized documents, and claim she failed to base her order on sound legal reasoning.

In dismissing the complaints, Chief Judge William Pryor said the allegations lacked sufficient evidence showing that Cannon was out to favor Trump or had a conflict of interest. He also wrote that allegations concerning the merits of a judge’s decision can’t go forward under judicial misconduct rules.

“To the extent complainant’s allegations concern the substance of the subject judge’s official actions, rulings, findings, and orders in the above-described case, the allegations are directly related to the merits of the subject judge’s decisions or procedural rulings,” he wrote in one of the decisions.

Read more: https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2022/12/06/judge-dismisses-ethics-complaints-accusing-aileen-cannon-of-bias-in-trump-special-master-order/?slreturn=20221106155444

12 replies, 3237 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 12 replies Author Time Post
Reply Judge Dismisses Ethics Complaints Accusing Aileen Cannon of Bias in Trump Special Master Order (Original post)
Jose Garcia Dec 2022 OP
agingdem Dec 2022 #1
LastDemocratInSC Dec 2022 #2
NCjack Dec 2022 #8
Karadeniz Dec 2022 #3
chowder66 Dec 2022 #4
ificandream Dec 2022 #5
onenote Dec 2022 #11
iluvtennis Dec 2022 #6
aggiesal Dec 2022 #7
onenote Dec 2022 #12
stopdiggin Dec 2022 #9
triron Dec 2022 #10

Response to Jose Garcia (Original post)

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 05:07 PM

1. I don't care..

Last edited Wed Dec 7, 2022, 10:20 AM - Edit history (1)

the 11th Circuit slapped Cannon down hard last week..admonished her for asserting equatable jurisdiction...she singlehandedly destroyed her reputation and she will forever be tainted by the Trump stink..good enough...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to agingdem (Reply #1)

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 05:40 PM

2. A case of virtual self immolation.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to agingdem (Reply #1)

Wed Dec 7, 2022, 09:15 AM

8. I agree. Trump stench does not wash off. Hopefully, for the rest of

her career, she will be assigned only "parking violation" cases.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jose Garcia (Original post)

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 06:00 PM

3. Insufficient evidence? She wrote that Trump, as expresident, deserved special accommodations.

Favoritism is surely a violation of judicial ethics.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Karadeniz (Reply #3)

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 06:46 PM

4. +1

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jose Garcia (Original post)

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 06:56 PM

5. The judge basically said she can rule what she wants.

Which means she could do it again. God help us.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to ificandream (Reply #5)

Wed Dec 7, 2022, 10:31 AM

11. That's right. Judges can rule what they want. And their decisions can be reversed

Which is what happened here.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jose Garcia (Original post)

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 07:53 PM

6. Judge was appointed by George W. Bush

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to iluvtennis (Reply #6)

Tue Dec 6, 2022, 08:23 PM

7. Another conservative Lipless wonder, just like Dr. Frank Burns of M*A*S*H n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to iluvtennis (Reply #6)

Wed Dec 7, 2022, 10:33 AM

12. Pryor also the judge that reversed Cannon, quite forcefully.

Judge Middlebrooks, who hammered trump and imposed sanctions for his frivolous suit against Hillary, was appointed by Bill. He correctly refused to recuse himself from the case and any claim of misconduct against him would be rejected as well.

Just because Pryor was appointed by a republican doesn't make this decision, which was entirely predictable, suspect.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jose Garcia (Original post)

Wed Dec 7, 2022, 09:53 AM

9. this is to be totatlly expected

and many 'observers' said as much about these complaints at the time. Anybody can file a complaint ... And in this case the did.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Jose Garcia (Original post)

Wed Dec 7, 2022, 10:12 AM

10. WTF?!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread