AI and Copyright:Human Artistry Campaign Launches to Support Songwriters and Musicians' Rights

[highplainsdem]

Source: Variety

The fast rise of AI technology has opened up a world of brain-busting questions about copyright and creators’ rights — for example, if David Guetta drops a song with a ChatGPT-generated verse from a fake Eminem, who gets paid? — and it’s safe to say them music industry is alarmed by this universe of new challenges.

A new coalition to meet those challenges called the Human Artistry Campaign was announced at the South by Southwest conference on Thursday, with support from more than 40 organizations, including the Recording Academy, the National Music Publishers Association, the Recording Industry of America and many others.

With a stated goal “to ensure artificial intelligence technologies are developed and used in ways that support human culture and artistry – and not ways that replace or erode it,” the organization outlined principles advocating AI best practices, “emphasizing respect for artists, their work, and their personas; transparency; and adherence to existing law including copyright and intellectual property,” which are outlined in full below. The campaign urges supporters to sign a petition to advance those principles.

Members include: American Association of Independent Music, American Federation of Musicians, Americana Music Association, American Photographic Artists, Artist Rights Alliance, Artist Rights Watch, ASCAP, Association of American Publishers, Black Music Action Coalition, Christian Music Trade Association, Church Music Publishers Association, Concept Art Association, Department of Professional Employees, AFL-CIO, European Composer and Songwriter Alliance, Future of Music Coalition, Georgia Music Partners, Global Music Rights, Gospel Music Association, Graphic Artists Guild, IFPI, International Federation of Actors, #IRespectMusic, Living Legends Foundation, MLB Players’ Association, Music Artists Coalition, Music Tech Policy, Music Workers Alliance, National Music Publishers’ Association, News Media Alliance, NFL Players Association, NHL Players’ Association, Professional Photographers of America, Recording Academy, Recording Industry Association of America, Rhythm & Blues Foundation, SAG-AFTRA, SESAC, Songwriters of North America, SoundExchange and The Trichordist.

-snip-

Read more: https://variety.com/2023/music/news/ai-copyright-human-artistry-campaign-musicians-songwriters-artificial-intelligence-1235557582/

---

There's an article about this on the Gospel Music Association website

https://gospelmusic.org/human-artistry-campaign-launches-announces-ai-principles/

and I'm going to quote the third core principle, which is the one that shows they're REALLY going after the creators/manufacturers of AI products that rip off artists:

3. Use of copyrighted works, and use of the voices and likenesses of professional performers, requires authorization, licensing, and compliance with all relevant state and federal laws.

We fully recognize the immense potential of AI to push the boundaries for knowledge and scientific progress. However, as with predecessor technologies, the use of copyrighted works requires permission from the copyright owner. AI must be subject to free-market licensing for the use of works in the development and training of AI models. Creators and copyright owners must retain exclusive control over determining how their content is used. AI developers must ensure any content used for training purposes is approved and licensed from the copyright owner, including content previously used by any pre-trained AIs they may adopt. Additionally, performers’ and athletes’ voices and likenesses must only be used with their consent and fair market compensation for specific uses.

I hope this new coalition nails them for all that theft.

[YoshidaYui]

1. The artwork is really cool....

LARA CROFT AND INDIANA JONES

[highplainsdem]

2. Yes, because it's ripped off so many artists' work without

permission or compensation.

See this OP: https://www.democraticunderground.com/100217726298

[bigmonk]

3. Fair

In a just and fair system, anything generated by AI would immediately placed in public domain. Machines aren't human. Machines do not have human rights.

[Hermit-The-Prog]

8. But do androids dream of electric sheep?

[Ligyron]

4. My Google Hangouts turned into Chat and now it's icon says "Ai"

I wonder if this means mere mortals like myself have access to AI technology for our own use?

Probably ought to check that possibility out, even though I have absolutely no idea what to use it for exactly.

[LisaM]

5. This has to be dealt with upfront.

The basic problem is that a lot of people simply do not understand or respect copyright.

You don't need to register a copyright to own it. Copyright is implicit by creation. With AI, the question is who created it, and the short answer is that whoever made up the code that generated the AI to begin with should own those rights. AI creators are looking at the end product, but that's not how copyright works.

This is a huge problem with music sampling too, people sticking other peoples' work into theirs, without acknowledgement or more importantly, compensation.

[quaint]

6. What about the creators of the original works the AI coder used without compensation or permission?

[andym]

7. Thing is that AI can actually create it's own original work

Anyone can ask it to, perhaps even another AI. Who if anyone owns the copyright?