Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(128,895 posts)
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 09:05 AM Jun 2023

Merck sues Biden administration over Medicare drug price negotiations

Last edited Tue Jun 6, 2023, 02:58 PM - Edit history (3)

Source: CNBC

Global drugmaker Merck on Tuesday sued the Biden administration over Medicare’s new powers to substantially reduce drug prices for seniors under the Inflation Reduction Act, the opening salvo in the pharmaceutical industry’s efforts to weaken the program. Merck called the law’s drug price negotiation program a “sham” and “tantamount to extortion” in a scathing complaint in federal court in Washington D.C.

The company also accused the federal government of employing what the suit describes as an unconstitutional scheme to take private property for public use without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment. Merck’s complaint asks a judge to block the U.S. Health and Human Services Department from compelling the drugmaker to participate in the program.

Merck last year booked $2.8 billion in revenue from its Type 2 diabetes drug Januvia, a medication that it said will be subject to Medicare price negotiations in 2023. The company also anticipates its blockbuster cancer immunotherapy treatment Keytruda and its other diabetes drug Janumet will be subject to the program in subsequent negotiation cycles. The drugmaker booked $21 billion in sales from Keytruda in 2022 and $1.7 billion in sales from Janumet. Keytruda represented 35% of Merck’s total revenue last year.

HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra, in response to Merck’s suit, said, “We’ll vigorously defend the President’s drug price negotiation law, which is already lowering health care costs for seniors and people with disabilities.” “The law is on our side,” said Becerra, whose department oversees Medicare, the federal health coverage program for older Americans and people with Social Security disability benefits. Nearly 60 million Americans are enrolled in Medicare.

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/06/merck-sues-biden-administration-over-medicare-drug-price-negotiations.html



They better watch out for the SCOTUS, which may become the final arbiter of what drugs are "approved" to be sold at all and Merck may find themselves on the "losing end" of that equation.

Article updated.

Previous articles -

Global drugmaker Merck on Tuesday sued the Biden administration over Medicare's new powers to substantially reduce drug prices for seniors under the Inflation Reduction Act, the opening salvo in the pharmaceutical industry's efforts to weaken the program. In a scathing complaint filed in federal court in Washington D.C., Merck excoriated the negotiation process as a "sham" and "tantamount to extortion."

The drugmaker accused the federal government of employing what the company described as an unconstitutional scheme to take private property for public use without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The Inflation Reduction Act, which became law last summer, was a major victory for President Joe Biden and Democrats in Congress, who have long pushed to empower Medicare to combat rising drug prices.

The pharmaceutical industry has fiercely opposed the law, arguing it will stifle new drug development. Merck said the Department of Health and Human Services compels companies to enter into an agreement that effectively dictates the price of a drug at a 25% to 60% discount under threat of daily excise taxes that are several times higher than the medication's daily revenue.

Merck has asked a judge to block HHS from compelling the drugmaker to participate in the program. "Under the IRA, the Government will requisition Merck's patented pharmaceutical products and transfer them to Medicare beneficiaries through forced sales," the company's legal team wrote in the complaint. "Those forced sales--coerced by the threat of draconian penalties that the Government has admitted no manufacturer could ever rationally afford to pay--will deprive Merck of possession and title to its personal property," Merck's attorneys wrote.



Global drugmaker Merck on Tuesday sued the Biden administration over Medicare's new powers to substantially reduce drug prices for seniors under the Inflation Reduction Act, the opening salvo in the pharmaceutical industry's efforts to weaken the program. In a scathing complaint filed in federal district court, Merck excoriated the negotiation process as a "sham" and "tantamount to extortion."

The drugmaker accused the federal government of employing what the company described as an unconstitutional scheme to take private property for public use without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment. The Inflation Reduction Act, which became law last summer, was a major victory for President Joe Biden and Democrats in Congress, who have long pushed to empower Medicare to combat rising drug prices.

The pharmaceutical industry has fiercely opposed the law, arguing that it will stifle new drug development. Merck said the Department of Health and Human Services compels companies to enter into an agreement that effectively dictates the price of a drug at a 25% to 60% discount under threat of daily excise taxes that are several times higher than the medication's daily revenue.

The company asked the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to block HHS from compelling the drugmaker to enter into any agreement under the program to slash prices and void any agreement the company has been forced to enter into. "Under the IRA, the Government will requisition Merck's patented pharmaceutical products and transfer them to Medicare beneficiaries through forced sales," the company's legal team wrote in the complaint.



Original article -

Global drugmaker Merck on Tuesday sued the Biden administration over Medicare's new powers to substantially reduce drug prices for seniors under the Inflation Reduction Act, the opening salvo in the pharmaceutical industry's efforts to weaken the program. In a scathing complaint filed in federal district court, Merck excoriated the negotiation process as a "sham" and "tantamount to extortion."

The drugmaker accused the federal government of employing what the company described as an unconstitutional scheme to take private property for public use without just compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment. Merck said the Department of Health and Human Services compels companies to enter into an agreement that effectively dictates the price of a drug at a 25% to 60% discount under threat of daily excise taxes that are several times higher than the medication's daily revenue.

The company asked the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to block HHS from compelling the drugmaker to enter into any agreement under the program to slash prices and void any agreement the company has been forced to enter into.

"Under the IRA, the Government will requisition Merck's patented pharmaceutical products and transfer them to Medicare beneficiaries through forced sales," the company's legal team wrote in the complaint. "Those forced sales--coerced by the threat of draconian penalties that the Government has admitted no manufacturer could ever rationally afford to pay--will deprive Merck of possession and title to its personal property," Merck's attorneys wrote.
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Merck sues Biden administration over Medicare drug price negotiations (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 OP
This is how corporations pre-empt Congress's lawmaking -- through the courts. ancianita Jun 2023 #1
How dare they use the court system for its intended purpose ripcord Jun 2023 #12
IS its intended purpose, though, to make rulings in the absence of congressional law? I don't think ancianita Jun 2023 #15
Extortion? EXTORTION??? Insulin costs increased 600% over the last 20 years. CurtEastPoint Jun 2023 #2
as well the cost of EpiPens Justice Jun 2023 #19
Eff them !! mucifer Jun 2023 #3
Let's look at prices of these same drugs in other countries. Fucking crooks. groundloop Jun 2023 #4
How much does Merck charge for those same drugs in other countries? Freethinker65 Jun 2023 #5
so they could gouge us more.? AllaN01Bear Jun 2023 #6
If They Do Not Like The Offered Price, Sir, They Are Free Not To Sell The Magistrate Jun 2023 #7
+1 ancianita Jun 2023 #16
Exactly. The government is not "taking", they are negotiating price. Midnight Writer Jun 2023 #24
Just need to set the price as to what more progressive countries like N. Korea or Uganda pay. LiberalArkie Jun 2023 #8
Phuck Pharma hueymahl Jun 2023 #9
Sounds like... 2naSalit Jun 2023 #10
Irony Deficient n/t aggiesal Jun 2023 #11
Well we are all well and truly fucked. Who expects the fascist corrupt SCOTUS to side with us Comfortably_Numb Jun 2023 #13
Cut all subsidies, eliminate all bullshit protections. No government investment in their R&D. Scalded Nun Jun 2023 #14
Merek demands angrychair Jun 2023 #17
WTF 🤬 live love laugh Jun 2023 #18
Where are elected reQublicans on this issue? KS Toronado Jun 2023 #20
Just a question. Are drug prices FLSurfer Jun 2023 #21
This is the scheme everyone will use now to override all legislation PSPS Jun 2023 #22
"They're not coming for me, they're coming for you, I'm just in the way." CaptainTruth Jun 2023 #23

ancianita

(36,031 posts)
1. This is how corporations pre-empt Congress's lawmaking -- through the courts.
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 09:08 AM
Jun 2023

Corporate lawmaking through courts is fascism. Not just "law in commerce."

ancianita

(36,031 posts)
15. IS its intended purpose, though, to make rulings in the absence of congressional law? I don't think
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 11:00 AM
Jun 2023

so; otoh, they don't care about overturning legal precedent.

The Biden's administration isn't violating their "free speech," which is profit. It's only curtailing Merck's abuse of free speech, which amount to unaffordable pricing that really harms humans.

Though SCOTUS has granted that money is speech, there must be data that show life endangering harm to humans due to the unaffordability of high priced drugs, because it's a well known fact that Americans pay the highest drug prices on the planet.

It's a corporate court, so we'll see how human interests of "life" balance with corporate profit "free speech."

Freethinker65

(10,013 posts)
5. How much does Merck charge for those same drugs in other countries?
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 09:24 AM
Jun 2023

Merck threatening US taxpayers and the US Government, if the Government insists on lower pricing because they buy in bulk, is the real extortion.

The Magistrate

(95,247 posts)
7. If They Do Not Like The Offered Price, Sir, They Are Free Not To Sell
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 09:36 AM
Jun 2023

They have no right to a customer, let alone to any sale at a specific price.

Comfortably_Numb

(3,804 posts)
13. Well we are all well and truly fucked. Who expects the fascist corrupt SCOTUS to side with us
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 10:35 AM
Jun 2023

plebes? We can’t hire their wives for millions, or give them millions in free vacations. The drug companies own those whores and this shit is a fait accompli. Fuck the corrupt court all the way to the depths of fucking hell.

Scalded Nun

(1,236 posts)
14. Cut all subsidies, eliminate all bullshit protections. No government investment in their R&D.
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 10:37 AM
Jun 2023

Let's face it, their 'personal property' is bought and paid for by taxpayers, who then have to pay the inflated prices for something they themselves paid to have developed.

Drug company greed will suck all the air out of any room they enter.

FLSurfer

(431 posts)
21. Just a question. Are drug prices
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 12:59 PM
Jun 2023

In developing countries cheaper because United States citizens pay inflated prices?
What happens if corporate profits are reduced due to the inflation reduction act?
Will other countries see inflated prices to compensate for lost revenue?

In no way am I suggesting the U S should subsidize the worlds medication cost. I’m just curious.

PSPS

(13,593 posts)
22. This is the scheme everyone will use now to override all legislation
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 01:01 PM
Jun 2023

The supreme court has already endorsed this when they said FDA rules were invalid. It goes like this: My profit is my private property. If any law or regulatory rule infringes on my profit, it is an illegal seizure of my property and, thus, must be ruled unconstitutional.

CaptainTruth

(6,589 posts)
23. "They're not coming for me, they're coming for you, I'm just in the way."
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 01:09 PM
Jun 2023

Remember Trump saying that crap about nothing in particular? Who was "they" & what were they coming after? No one knew & Trump couldn't say.

This seems like a case where Biden could say that same line to MAGAts & it would have real meaning.

Pharmaceutical companies aren't coming for me, they're coming for your money, I'm just in the way.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Merck sues Biden administ...