Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(128,714 posts)
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 02:33 PM Jun 2023

Judge agrees to reveal backers of George Santos' $500,000 bond, but keeps names hidden for

Last edited Wed Jun 7, 2023, 05:09 AM - Edit history (1)

Source: CBS News

Washington — A federal judge in New York has granted a request from media organizations to make public the identities of three people who signed the bond for Rep. George Santos' release after his indictment, but said their names should remain hidden for now to allow Santos to appeal.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Anne Shields said Tuesday that she granted an order to unseal the identities of the guarantors of Santos' $500,000 bond. However, she directed the clerk of the court to keep her decision and the bond under seal, giving Santos until noon Friday to challenge her ruling.

Defense attorneys for Santos, a Republican from New York, filed a motion under a court-imposed deadline Monday night arguing the court should keep the records under wraps. His defense said the three people who helped provide Santos' bond would be "likely to suffer great distress, may lose their jobs, and God forbid, may suffer physical injury" if their identities were made public.

"There is little doubt that the suretors will suffer some unnecessary form of retaliation if their identities and employment are revealed," Santos' filing said. It closed by saying that Santos "would rather surrender to pretrial detainment than subject these suretors to what will inevitably come."

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/george-santos-bond-judge-order-names-hidden/



Judge: No more delays
Judge: Here's the Ruling... for the plaintiffs
Judge: Delay until Friday for defendant response.

I expect Friday there will be a request to "delay" by Santos, until the following Monday.
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge agrees to reveal backers of George Santos' $500,000 bond, but keeps names hidden for (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 OP
Sold genxlib Jun 2023 #1
Yeah, he can't vote from jail.. Kev will Cha Jun 2023 #4
In a fair world genxlib Jun 2023 #9
Ah. Thank you. He sure Cha Jun 2023 #12
No. former9thward Jun 2023 #16
So let me reframe. genxlib Jun 2023 #20
Do you know if he has to pay taxes on that? Haggard Celine Jun 2023 #28
It really isn't his option, the medias motion was based on the First Amendment and publics interest ToxMarz Jun 2023 #19
If supporting Santos could cost you your job... dchill Jun 2023 #2
Exactly! My 1st thought. If you don't want to be in the public eye, Fla Dem Jun 2023 #5
There should be NO SUCH THING... dchill Jun 2023 #13
Judge keeps extending the time for reveal Beachnutt Jun 2023 #3
I regret to say that this is due process even if an Ass**** is using it. Ford_Prefect Jun 2023 #11
What are they afraid of? bpj62 Jun 2023 #6
I'm entertaining the idea, considering George Santos's history, the..... Brother Buzz Jun 2023 #8
Usually the bond is secured against property bpj62 Jun 2023 #10
No, it was not cash. former9thward Jun 2023 #17
This bond isn't secured. Just a promise from three shadowy figures to make good on it eggplant Jun 2023 #18
Oh my bpj62 Jun 2023 #30
There's a Thought.. TY! Cha Jun 2023 #14
Or it's 2 Russians and Harlan Crowe Captain Zero Jun 2023 #23
This makes me smile LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2023 #7
I bet mtg is one of them. Baitball Blogger Jun 2023 #15
I said that too..her and other free dumb caucus idiots! PortTack Jun 2023 #22
appeal and delay, right out of republicans handbook. republianmushroom Jun 2023 #21
So the names are unsealed, but they're sealed. Permanut Jun 2023 #24
Santos would betray them in a heartbeat. keithbvadu2 Jun 2023 #25
Raise your hand if you think there's a tRUMP connection to the creeps who posted his bail. NT SayItLoud Jun 2023 #26
Trump and the Freedom Caucus. Haggard Celine Jun 2023 #29
Cant we get both? Grimelle Jun 2023 #27
Lock him up Major Nikon Jun 2023 #31

genxlib

(5,524 posts)
1. Sold
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 02:39 PM
Jun 2023

I'll take this option

It closed by saying that Santos "would rather surrender to pretrial detainment than subject these suretors to what will inevitably come."


Let him stay in jail if the truth is that untenable

Cha

(297,029 posts)
4. Yeah, he can't vote from jail.. Kev will
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 02:43 PM
Jun 2023

be UPSET.

What's the big deal on who posted the criminal's bail, anyway.

I can't imagine any billionaires being in trouble over this?

What am I missing?

genxlib

(5,524 posts)
9. In a fair world
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 03:10 PM
Jun 2023

The posting of bond would be considered bribery and undue influence.

Since most bail bondsmen usually charge 10% fee, the posting of that bond is worth $50,000.

If Santos isn't paying it, then it is a gift to him worth that much.

former9thward

(31,962 posts)
16. No.
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 03:46 PM
Jun 2023

They did not have to put up cash. It was a promise to cover it. And bail is not considered a gift or income by any government agency because its not. And it should not be considered one. In a fair world.

genxlib

(5,524 posts)
20. So let me reframe.
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 04:03 PM
Jun 2023

Maybe it isn't legally a gift.

But do you think Santos would feel like he owes them a favor?

Has he received something of value (freedom) that would have cost him 50k without the help?

Maybe not legally but this reeks of influence peddling.

Haggard Celine

(16,843 posts)
28. Do you know if he has to pay taxes on that?
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 05:38 PM
Jun 2023

He's been given $50,000. He should pay taxes on it. But he's got a good job. Much better than he deserves.

ToxMarz

(2,166 posts)
19. It really isn't his option, the medias motion was based on the First Amendment and publics interest
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 04:01 PM
Jun 2023

to know. It's absolutely their right to that information whether or not the bond is still in place. Santo is trying to crate a bartering chip where none exist.

dchill

(38,462 posts)
2. If supporting Santos could cost you your job...
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 02:40 PM
Jun 2023

... maybe it you shouldn't support Santos!

Just a thought.

Fla Dem

(23,623 posts)
5. Exactly! My 1st thought. If you don't want to be in the public eye,
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 02:49 PM
Jun 2023

then keep out of high profile front page situations.

Ford_Prefect

(7,875 posts)
11. I regret to say that this is due process even if an Ass**** is using it.
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 03:20 PM
Jun 2023

Defendant is entitled to an appeal.

I must ask why anyone who thus assisted Santos could be doing so in any jeopardy at all. He's Kevin's golden boy after all.

bpj62

(999 posts)
6. What are they afraid of?
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 02:49 PM
Jun 2023

It boggles my mind just how far the right will go to hide thier financial backers. Santos defense team is trying to convince the judge that a leftist mob will decend upon the people who posted bail with pitchforks and knives. I am so tired of that trope.
Santos and McCarthy must really be fearful of the backlash they will get once the names are revealed.

Brother Buzz

(36,407 posts)
8. I'm entertaining the idea, considering George Santos's history, the.....
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 03:03 PM
Jun 2023

three names could be fictitious, and the funds drawn from numbered overseas accounts.

bpj62

(999 posts)
10. Usually the bond is secured against property
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 03:18 PM
Jun 2023

Since three put up the bond I am assuming they put all of it up in the form of a cash bond because otherwise the Fed would want some dort of collateral. There may also be restrictions on where that cash bond comes. Should be interesting.

former9thward

(31,962 posts)
17. No, it was not cash.
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 03:49 PM
Jun 2023

It was simply a promise to pay. They apparently have collateral to back up the promise but they did not have to put it up per the court.

eggplant

(3,911 posts)
18. This bond isn't secured. Just a promise from three shadowy figures to make good on it
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 03:58 PM
Jun 2023

if he vanishes.

PortTack

(32,750 posts)
22. I said that too..her and other free dumb caucus idiots!
Tue Jun 6, 2023, 04:53 PM
Jun 2023

Seriously who else would be “injured” by such a reveal?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge agrees to reveal ba...