Top Romney Adviser Brags About Losing Poor, Minority Voters To Obama
Last edited Thu Nov 29, 2012, 07:23 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: Yahoo
Mitt Romney can take some solace in his devastating loss on Nov. 6: at least he won the voters who really count.
That's the thesis anyway of top adviser Stuart Stevens, who penned an op-ed in the Washington Post on Wednesday arguing that by winning wealthier and whiter voters, Romney secured the moral victory over Obama.
"On Nov. 6, Mitt Romney carried the majority of every economic group except those with less than $50,000 a year in household income," Stevens wrote. "That means he carried the majority of middle-class voters. While John McCain lost white voters under 30 by 10 points, Romney won those voters by seven points, a 17-point shift."
According to Stevens, "The Republican Party has problems, but as we go forward, let's remember that any party that captures the majority of the middle class must be doing something right." As a result, "Republican ideals -- Mitt Romney -- carried the day."
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/top-romney-adviser-brags-losing-poor-minority-voters-180955828--politics.html
On the day before the loser has lunch with our President--a President who is one of us non-whites who don't count, any more than those making under $50,000 per year.
Stay classy, Romney campaign!
truthisfreedom
(23,146 posts)All of my close friends are in that category, and he didn't get their votes either. He got a bunch of rural punkin-head votes. Farmers who get a lot of gubmint subsidies.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)Fwiw, we are also in that group and voted for Obama....
HockeyMom
(14,337 posts)I had to restrain myself from smashing my TV whenever I saw Queen Ann on there.
x2 vancouverite
(89 posts)I'm a man, but I'm with you 100%. I am so very glad that she and her horse and her husband (in that order! ) shall gradually fade onto, yea verily, the dimming twilight of political history.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)I am thinking how stupid and unthinking it was for the oligarchs to embrace the second amendment. Given that there are about 330m people in America and about 390m guns lying around, when people get tired of eating dirt there will be hell to pay. And it won't be hard to find them. They live in the big houses.
RedCloud
(9,230 posts)Was it 100% of them?
That was his big card he was playing NOT the classes.
skypilot
(8,853 posts)...whatever they have to in order to help them sleep at night.
BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)Unfortunately, the only way to win under that system is either to (a) weight the votes of the more desireable citizens as being worth double or triple those of the "commoners"; or (b) revert to the old system where only white, land-owning aristocrats are allowed to vote.
Apart from that, Mr. Snooty-Pants can forget about ever winning any elective office.
bucolic_frolic
(43,142 posts)Remember when Newt ran all over the country, and Rush complained
on his Hot Air Machine, about all the Democrats were ELITES!!!
Washington Elites!! ELITES! ELITES who wanted to protect parks
from development, acting as DECIDERS for the rest of America!
Now it turns out Mitt was appealing to his own ELITES!!!
Mitt, and the GOP, ELITE PANDERERS!
Too hypocritical, too funny, too pathetic for words.
ELITES. ROFLMAO
Aristus
(66,327 posts)the cut-off mark mentioned by this guy, and nothing could ever induce me to vote for Romney or his ilk.
Maybe I voted for President Obama because I'm, you know, smart...
brewens
(13,581 posts)That's what they don't get. If they really want to see the end of the system they love, push things too far knocking working people down. If too many people get screwed, even the half-wits will turn on them. Then the shit hits the fan and stays hit!
OldEurope
(1,273 posts)..you need a certain level of intelligence and knowledge. The really wealthy don´t have that. Because they do not have to be intelligent or work hard to get their degrees and get wealthy. They just inherit. There are some rich people with brains, but they did never support the Republican Party, at least since Nixon got unmasked.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)There is no victory in carrying dwarf people, fat people, people with birthmarks, geminis, virgos or stupid people unless one has more votes in total state-by-state.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)blackdiamond62
(24 posts)is the twelfth of NEVER
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)FreeBC
(403 posts)Tough position for the republicans: only rich people vote for them and their trickle down policies make everyone poor.
RWilliam
(6 posts)my first DU post ever as well, although I have been following since Sept.
I agree- this is a 'class' act coming from the RMoney campaign. Nothing classy at all really. Part of Romnesia still at work- if I recall they lost the election.
niyad
(113,276 posts)myrna minx
(22,772 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,013 posts)Outstanding! Welcome!
goclark
(30,404 posts)We work as a team.
There are so many brilliant political
members here.
Enjoy!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Obama did it for me in 2008!
Politicub
(12,165 posts)alp227
(32,019 posts)someone else made a pro-Obama type video with the song
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)in order to have more than their neighbor has the moral high ground?! Really?!
frylock
(34,825 posts)enjoy your "moral victory," assholes. we got scoreboard!
japple
(9,822 posts)Most were people who voted for PBO. Don't tell me he doesn't have a mandate!
alp227
(32,019 posts)japple
(9,822 posts)alp227
(32,019 posts)but in my experience and from what I've read elsewhere on DU, Yahoo comments & comments sections after other nonpartisan news sites are DOMINATED with the latest RW spin from talk radio or Fox Non-News.
MFM008
(19,806 posts)The ones that made him LOSE? LOL.
NHDEMFORLIFE
(489 posts)starroute
(12,977 posts)Obama only took 60% of the under-30 vote this time, compared to 66% in 2008 -- but he still beat Romney among those voters by 24 points. So how could Romney have been ahead among white voters under 30 by 7 points?
It seems to me that would only work if whites represented less than half of the under-30 voters and went for Romney by an overwhelming majority. Or am I missing something here?
onenote
(42,700 posts)Under 30 African American voters represented 3 percent of the electorate and under 30 Latino voters made up 4 percent. While Romney took the 11 percent group by 7 points, He lost the the 3 percent group 83 points and the 4 percent group by over 50 points. A quick simple example shows how focusing on young white voters is a losing strategy. If the electorate had 1000 voters, Romney would have taken 56 votes from under 30 whites, 2 votes from under 30 AAs, and 9 votes from under thirty Latinos (a total of 67 votes). Obama, on the other hand, grabs 48 under 30 whites, 27 under 30 AAs and 29 under 30 Latinos for a total of 104 votes.
Given that the part of the electorate represented by under 30 white is almost certainly going to be in decline compared to the share of under 30 AA and Latino (and Asian) voters, Romney's strategist's strategy is the equivalent of investing in the Pony Express.
Third Doctor
(1,574 posts)the fact that he ran a terrible campaign. They were delusional up to election night and some are still delusional I see.
Samurai_Writer
(2,934 posts)Wow... I have made way over 50,000 a year as a technical writer. But I wanted to do something more worthwhile, and became an R.N. at a state-run hospital. I don't consider my self 'poor', even though I make less than 50,000 right now as a new nurse in a nonprofit, unionized job. Granted, most R.N.s make a lot more than me. But to consider 50,000 a year 'poor'? I'm glad I don't fit into his desired demographic. Even if I did, I would NEVER vote for someone like Mitt Romney!
toby jo
(1,269 posts)These ol' boys got a long, long, long way to fall, eh?
struggle4progress
(118,281 posts)olddad56
(5,732 posts)surrealAmerican
(11,360 posts)... half of the "middle class" would be earning less than that. His conclusion that they won "the majority of middle-class voters" is in no way proven by these statistics, and is almost certainly false.
Solly Mack
(90,762 posts)onenote
(42,700 posts)and self-pitying as Stevens' op-ed. My favorite part (other than his absurd notion that winning young white voters by 7 point while losing young non-white voters by an average of around 70 points is a good thing for repubs) is his declaration that no one in the "professional political class" thought Romney had a snowball's chance in hell of winning the repub nomination. The truth is that Romney was from the start to the finish the repub establishment's candidate and while their confidence was shaken by his abysmal showing in the early days of the primaries, they always were behind him. As for Romney convincing the voters not the political class? Well, that's a laugh. It wasn't until the last batch of primaries in April (after most of his competition had thrown in the towel because they lacked the money) that Romney consistently began to win 50 percent or more of the primary vote. Heck, on Super Tuesday, he only got 38 percent of the vote. The rest was split amongst a bunch of unelectable clowns. Same thing in the mid-March primaries -- Romney couldn't attract even 40 percent of the repub primary voters.
He was the choice of the establishment, but not of the crazies that come out to vote in primaries. What saved him was that the crazies flitted from one nutjob (Cain! Bachmannn! Newt!! Santorum!!) after another and didn't rally behind just one of them.
Pathetic. Stevens will be the source of much laughter in DC tomorrow morning.
JI7
(89,247 posts)that is disappointing. i know OBama lost the older crowd but thought he would have won the younger ones.
LAGC
(5,330 posts)When you take the South out of the equation, most under 30 whites voted for Obama.
Turbineguy
(37,322 posts)The less than $50,000 per year group has grown thanks to GOP economic policies. It's the GOP that helped Obama win the election.
secondvariety
(1,245 posts)a poor person's vote counts the same as a rich person's vote.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)is bs. what pathetic(loser) people.
NMDemDist2
(49,313 posts)asshole.
Blasphemer
(3,261 posts)SariesNightly
(285 posts)n/t
alp227
(32,019 posts)Get over it, you lost the election, most Americans don't care about Romney anymore. Not even in 2016, 2020, and beyond.
NICO9000
(970 posts)More delusional BS from a moron.
Blue4Texas
(437 posts)Still Losers
catbyte
(34,376 posts)Is Romney gonna pay for own lunch tomorrow to prove he's not "a taker"? What a lowlife.
Tunkamerica
(4,444 posts)starve it to nothing and then brag about winning a majority of a minority...
you might be a republican!
lunatica
(53,410 posts)He meant to put them there when he landed on his face.
Omaha Steve
(99,609 posts)Produced a plan to raise every household income to $50,000 or more he would have got every single vote.
1Greensix
(111 posts)Well, it's a darn good thing white middle class folks are having babies at a much faster pace than poor minorities are. Looks like the Republicans will be back on the White House before we know it. Like in,..........a hundred years.
Yes, Rummy did well in the South with Republican racists, but not quite so well with the states that Won the Civil War.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Oh wait, not a needle, just another elitist strawman.
EC
(12,287 posts)$50,000. So yeah, he just confirmed it....Rmoney only wanted the vote of the upper classes. Average people go screw yourselves, you don't count.
JimVukovich
(6 posts)Did Stuart Stevens really say that crap? Talk about "OUT OF TOUCH!"
As long as those beliefs guide those fools who ADVISE the GOP, the Democrats are guaranteed a very long reign in the White House.
drynberg
(1,648 posts)Ole Stuart Stevens can slice the cake this way and that, but he and his boy got the snot bopped outta their noses. Is Stu intimating that your income should be a factor of how many votes you get? Citizens United and tons of corporado cash just ain't enough? I just hope the American Public hears and remembers what is being said by Rmoney, McCain, Stevens, et al when they step into the polling booth the next several elections. Their true identity is coming through loud and clear. Hey Rethugs, "Foam On!".
OverBurn
(950 posts)Am I really that rare? I know lot's of guys that voted just like me, straight Dem ticket.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,939 posts)under the word dumbass.
TomChicago
(29 posts)Yes, the Republican party "has problems". Namely that they don't recognize, in even the grainiest of detail, that they are loathed by a majority of voting humans. The reason for this is also clear: that majority recognizes that the loathing is mutual. Second, they have gained a reputation for telling Great Lies, and that even cosmetics experts and sleight-of-hand artists like Rove will be hard-pressed to overcome the rich #$%$ history of "kinder and gentler", "compassionate conservative" and "trickle down".
Evasporque
(2,133 posts)Fucking moron.
Dash87
(3,220 posts)I approve of his ability to not get Republicans elected. Very nice
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)I guess we now know what will be on Fox for the next four years: 10 minutes on Benghazi, 10 minutes on how Mitt almost won the election with a different guest every time.
efhmc
(14,725 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)daleo
(21,317 posts)That way you will continue the slide into utter irrelevance.
leftlibdem420
(256 posts)All the scientists - America's best and brightest - who voted for Obama and all the morans populating the vapid, hypocritical mega churches who voted for romney.