Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,843 posts)
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 01:06 PM Jan 2013

House approves $9.7 billion in Sandy aid, with some Republican dissent

Source: Washington Post

By Rosalind S. Helderman, Friday, January 4, 12:36 PM

The House has approved $9.7 billion in new aid for victims of Hurricane Sandy, a face-saving quick move taken three days after House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) earned scathing criticism from New York and New Jersey Republicans for canceling a late-night vote on the funds.

The bill, which will allow the Federal Emergency Management Agency to pay out claims to those who held federal flood insurance, was approved on a 354 to 67 vote. The Senate is expected to adopt it later Friday on a unanimous voice vote.

Boehner seems to have had reason to be concerned about bringing a larger $60 billion spending measure to the floor on Tuesday: All the votes against the smaller bill on Friday came from his own party members.

They were encouraged by the conservative Club for Growth, which argued the additional disaster spending should be offset with cuts to other government programs. The continued GOP opposition could spell trouble for a larger $51 billion Sandy bill that Boehner has promised will come before the House on Jan. 15.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/house-approves-97b-in-sandy-aid-with-some-republican-dissent/2013/01/04/6a232c1c-5681-11e2-bf3e-76c0a789346f_story.html

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
2. Dems should attach amendments to all further Disaster Aid bills in Republican districts...
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 01:35 PM
Jan 2013

demanding non-partisan redistricting of congressional districts in every state whose delegation voted against the Sandy Relief Bill.

They want to play politics w/ disaster relief, fine.

meow2u3

(24,761 posts)
13. Great idea!
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 02:57 PM
Jan 2013

While they're at it, Dems should also sneak some clauses requiring districts to be as compact as possible.

If they want to play politics with disaster relief, two can play that game.

samsingh

(17,594 posts)
3. voters in the region should take note that it was Democrats who came to the
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 01:37 PM
Jan 2013

aide of their American brethren.

repugs would do nothing

 

julian09

(1,435 posts)
5. They are already blue states, that is why they opposed aid.
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 01:46 PM
Jan 2013

Check who were the no votes in bill just passed.

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
4. here is the "Hall of Shame" list of douche bag Republicons who voted no...
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 01:43 PM
Jan 2013

Amash
Barr
Benishek
Bentivolio
Blackburn
Bridenstine
Brooks (AL)
Broun (GA)
Chabot
Collins (GA)
Conaway
Cotton
Daines
DeSantis
DesJarlais
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Fincher
Fleming
Flores
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Harris
Holding
Hudson
Huelskamp
Hultgren
Jenkins
Jordan
Lamborn
Marchant
Massie
McClintock
Meadows
Mullin
Mulvaney
Neugebauer
Palazzo
Pearce
Perry
Petri
Pompeo
Price (GA)
Roe (TN)
Rokita
Rothfus
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Salmon
Schweikert
Sensenbrenner
Stutzman
Thornberry
Weber (TX)
Wenstrup
Williams
Wilson (SC)
Woodall
Yoder
Yoho



We need viable Dems to run against all of these tea-baggin' clowns in 2014. Surprisingly, my "representative", Koch whore Tim Walberg, voted yea.

efhmc

(14,725 posts)
8. Be happy to support someone to run against conaway, but
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 01:51 PM
Jan 2013

no one has the money, interest or support.

 

julian09

(1,435 posts)
10. I think part of the problem they are afraid to challenge TP in jerrymandered districts.
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 01:58 PM
Jan 2013

If they start now, they could make a difference, expose their votes locally. A disaster could happen to them as well and if they take same stance locally it would be their disaster with no fed help.

GoCubsGo

(32,078 posts)
14. Yes, and especially those who are in hurricane-prone states.
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 03:02 PM
Jan 2013

Including the filthbag who supposedly represents me, Joke Wilson. He and the other asshats from my state must have slept through Hugo.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»House approves $9.7 billi...