House approves $9.7 billion in Sandy aid, with some Republican dissent
Source: Washington Post
By Rosalind S. Helderman, Friday, January 4, 12:36 PM
The House has approved $9.7 billion in new aid for victims of Hurricane Sandy, a face-saving quick move taken three days after House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) earned scathing criticism from New York and New Jersey Republicans for canceling a late-night vote on the funds.
The bill, which will allow the Federal Emergency Management Agency to pay out claims to those who held federal flood insurance, was approved on a 354 to 67 vote. The Senate is expected to adopt it later Friday on a unanimous voice vote.
Boehner seems to have had reason to be concerned about bringing a larger $60 billion spending measure to the floor on Tuesday: All the votes against the smaller bill on Friday came from his own party members.
They were encouraged by the conservative Club for Growth, which argued the additional disaster spending should be offset with cuts to other government programs. The continued GOP opposition could spell trouble for a larger $51 billion Sandy bill that Boehner has promised will come before the House on Jan. 15.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/house-approves-97b-in-sandy-aid-with-some-republican-dissent/2013/01/04/6a232c1c-5681-11e2-bf3e-76c0a789346f_story.html
BlueNoteSpecial
(141 posts)Shhhhhhh...where's me C?
Blue State Bandit
(2,122 posts)demanding non-partisan redistricting of congressional districts in every state whose delegation voted against the Sandy Relief Bill.
They want to play politics w/ disaster relief, fine.
meow2u3
(24,761 posts)While they're at it, Dems should also sneak some clauses requiring districts to be as compact as possible.
If they want to play politics with disaster relief, two can play that game.
samsingh
(17,594 posts)aide of their American brethren.
repugs would do nothing
julian09
(1,435 posts)Check who were the no votes in bill just passed.
samsingh
(17,594 posts)julian09
(1,435 posts)samsingh
(17,594 posts)corkhead
(6,119 posts)Amash
Barr
Benishek
Bentivolio
Blackburn
Bridenstine
Brooks (AL)
Broun (GA)
Chabot
Collins (GA)
Conaway
Cotton
Daines
DeSantis
DesJarlais
Duffy
Duncan (SC)
Duncan (TN)
Fincher
Fleming
Flores
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Gosar
Gowdy
Graves (GA)
Graves (MO)
Harris
Holding
Hudson
Huelskamp
Hultgren
Jenkins
Jordan
Lamborn
Marchant
Massie
McClintock
Meadows
Mullin
Mulvaney
Neugebauer
Palazzo
Pearce
Perry
Petri
Pompeo
Price (GA)
Roe (TN)
Rokita
Rothfus
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Salmon
Schweikert
Sensenbrenner
Stutzman
Thornberry
Weber (TX)
Wenstrup
Williams
Wilson (SC)
Woodall
Yoder
Yoho
We need viable Dems to run against all of these tea-baggin' clowns in 2014. Surprisingly, my "representative", Koch whore Tim Walberg, voted yea.
efhmc
(14,725 posts)no one has the money, interest or support.
goclark
(30,404 posts)Big Time in those states!
julian09
(1,435 posts)If they start now, they could make a difference, expose their votes locally. A disaster could happen to them as well and if they take same stance locally it would be their disaster with no fed help.
samsingh
(17,594 posts)GoCubsGo
(32,078 posts)Including the filthbag who supposedly represents me, Joke Wilson. He and the other asshats from my state must have slept through Hugo.