Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 04:19 PM Jan 2013

Former NRA President Equates Gun Laws With Racism

Source: Talking Points Memo

Those looking for moderation and sensitivity in the gun control debate probably, by this point, know better than to look to the National Rifle Association.

But even by the standards of what we’ve heard from the NRA recently, comments made by former NRA president Marion Hammer earlier this week stand out.

Appearing on an episode of the NRA news show The Daily News on Wednesday, Hammer concluded a discussion of the prospects on gun control initiatives prompted by the Newtown, Conn. massacre by drawing a comparison between attempts to ban guns and racism.

“And they even admit this is about banning the ugliest guns, it’s about cosmetics and it has nothing to do about how a firearm works,” host Ginny Simone said toward the end of the segment.

Read more: http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/01/nra_marion_hammer_guns_racism.php?ref=fpa





These right-wing talking points are openly parroted by some on DU.
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Former NRA President Equates Gun Laws With Racism (Original Post) onehandle Jan 2013 OP
the NRA does not live in our universe samsingh Jan 2013 #1
That's not the comparison that I see on DU Recursion Jan 2013 #2
Bull, I've seen Gungeoneers compare their poor pitiful gun plight to the civil rights movement. Hoyt Jan 2013 #6
Well I think "shall issue" vs. "may issue" is a civil rights question Recursion Jan 2013 #9
Well, I think they should be restricted for all including yahoos who buy the bulk Hoyt Jan 2013 #11
Very apt comparison bongbong Jan 2013 #3
Seriously... what color is the sky in their world?? Gman Jan 2013 #4
Gun reform will go nowhere until we get gun "fans" to agree to a categorical definition of >>> Gidney N Cloyd Jan 2013 #5
Another stupid frigging gun humper Zoeisright Jan 2013 #7
Gun control laws have indeed been historically been racist and classist ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #8
Have gun control laws in the latter half of the 20th century been racist and classist? daleo Jan 2013 #18
The emphasis on "hunting" is a huge dogwhistle Recursion Jan 2013 #19
There are certainly ongoing classist impacts ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #21
Are there gun laws (or proposals) that say the rich can have guns, but not anyone else? daleo Jan 2013 #22
It is de facto, not de jure ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #23
By that standard, all of modern life is classist, as the rich can always afford more than the poor daleo Jan 2013 #26
Is there a rational, intelligently-led alternative to the NRA? . . . Journeyman Jan 2013 #10
No, only 4 million billh58 Jan 2013 #12
They have demonstrated in the past the ability to motivate quite a bit more ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #14
They weren't as effective because Obama didn't touch gun control NickB79 Jan 2013 #15
There are other pro gun organizations out there ProgressiveProfessor Jan 2013 #13
Guns are people? nt bemildred Jan 2013 #16
I've heard that some billh58 Jan 2013 #17
Nobody likes the taste of CLP in their mouth, but more importantly... Recursion Jan 2013 #20
Depends on the gun owner stultusporcos Jan 2013 #24
Poor baby is a "victim" - and a douchebag jpak Jan 2013 #25

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
2. That's not the comparison that I see on DU
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 04:24 PM
Jan 2013

I see people pointing out some of the unfortunate racist history gun control legislation has had in the past (Jim Crow, anti-immigrant laws, etc.)

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
6. Bull, I've seen Gungeoneers compare their poor pitiful gun plight to the civil rights movement.
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 04:33 PM
Jan 2013

They should be ashamed.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
9. Well I think "shall issue" vs. "may issue" is a civil rights question
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 04:40 PM
Jan 2013

But, yeah, for the most part the civil rights questions are pretty minor and I guess that does get overblown.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
11. Well, I think they should be restricted for all including yahoos who buy the bulk
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 04:49 PM
Jan 2013

of so-called assault weapons, and account for the majority of carry permits to protect them from irrational fears.

The yahoos are the ones we need to be concerned about nowadays.

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,831 posts)
5. Gun reform will go nowhere until we get gun "fans" to agree to a categorical definition of >>>
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 04:31 PM
Jan 2013

>>>the kinds of rapid fire, high capacity weapons that need to be restricted. You go into the gungeon and say "assault weapon" and they line up to tell you no such thing exists. Maybe we should start from scratch with a new term like "mass killer weapons" or "asshole weapons" then define it for them.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
8. Gun control laws have indeed been historically been racist and classist
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 04:37 PM
Jan 2013

Its not NRA talking points, its US history...

daleo

(21,317 posts)
18. Have gun control laws in the latter half of the 20th century been racist and classist?
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 11:35 PM
Jan 2013

Was the Brady Bill classist or racist? Is there some connection between owning an automatic weapon and being politically liberal on race and/or class? Alternatively, are gun control advocates usually racists?

It doesn't seem that way based on the people that I have known.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
19. The emphasis on "hunting" is a huge dogwhistle
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 11:43 PM
Jan 2013

Meaning "I'm fine with exurban white people having guns".

Alternatively, are gun control advocates usually racists?

Given that the founders of the Brady Campaign are Republicans? Yes. Along with Bloomberg and Giuliani. Yes again.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
21. There are certainly ongoing classist impacts
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 11:59 PM
Jan 2013

One can also argue that there are unintentional racial impacts. Back when there was real EEO/Affirmative action in the US, that could get you filed upon.

daleo

(21,317 posts)
22. Are there gun laws (or proposals) that say the rich can have guns, but not anyone else?
Sat Jan 5, 2013, 01:21 AM
Jan 2013

Or that whites can have guns, but not anyone else?

If so, please quote them.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
23. It is de facto, not de jure
Sat Jan 5, 2013, 02:30 AM
Jan 2013

By making it more expensive (or much more expensive) as some here have proposed, it is making it harder for the non-rich to own weapons. De Facto classism

daleo

(21,317 posts)
26. By that standard, all of modern life is classist, as the rich can always afford more than the poor
Sat Jan 5, 2013, 07:53 PM
Jan 2013

Logically, the government would have to provide all citizens with free guns, in order to mitigate the inherent classism of gun ownership itself, since the rich can always afford more and better guns.

Alternatively, strict laws against any gun ownership would eliminate this classism completely, so anyone concerned with classism or racism should be in favor of gun control.

Journeyman

(15,031 posts)
10. Is there a rational, intelligently-led alternative to the NRA? . . .
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 04:43 PM
Jan 2013

And if not, why hasn't someone in that "4 million strong" organization stepped forward with a better-led, better-managed organization?

I can't imagine that every gun owner feels they are competently represented by the loonies the NRA puts forth at every turn.

billh58

(6,635 posts)
12. No, only 4 million
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 05:09 PM
Jan 2013

of them feel that the "cold, dead hands" kind of representation is just peachy keen.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
14. They have demonstrated in the past the ability to motivate quite a bit more
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 05:36 PM
Jan 2013

However, this time they were not as effective in local elections as they have been in the past

NickB79

(19,233 posts)
15. They weren't as effective because Obama didn't touch gun control
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 05:52 PM
Jan 2013

So, they had nothing to use to motivate gun owners in the last election. No red meat to fire up the 80 million gun owners in this country.

If Sandy Hook had happened a year ago and the same debates on gun control and gun bans we're having now had occurred then, I'd bet money we'd be bitching about President Romney right now.

ProgressiveProfessor

(22,144 posts)
13. There are other pro gun organizations out there
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 05:35 PM
Jan 2013

Some claim to be liberal, but most make the NRA look like the nice guys

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
20. Nobody likes the taste of CLP in their mouth, but more importantly...
Fri Jan 4, 2013, 11:46 PM
Jan 2013

... you need to get to a place where even if that were so, it wouldn't bother you like it does. That's a tribalist kind of disdain and it keeps us from getting anywhere on this issue: gun owners know that at a very basic level your problem isn't with guns, it's with them.

 

stultusporcos

(327 posts)
24. Depends on the gun owner
Sat Jan 5, 2013, 06:27 AM
Jan 2013

There are a whole bunch of RW gun owners out there who would not think twice about shooting Liberals and Progressives if they had the opportunity which is the #1 reason why I am a gun owner.



Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Former NRA President Equa...