Heidi Heitkamp: Reported White House Gun Control Plans 'Way In Extreme'
Source: Huffington Post
Democratic Senator Heidi Heitkamp (N.D) told ABC's 'This Week' that gun control plans reportedly being considered by the White House are "way in extreme."
The Washington Post on Saturday reported that the Obama administration is weighing a broad approach to tackling the gun issue. Some of the measures apparently being weighed are universal background checks and stricter penalties for giving guns to a minor or bringing a gun near a school.
Heitkamp, who has an A-rating from the NRA, said that "I think you need to put everything on the table, but what I hear from the administration and if the Washington Post is to be believed thats way way in extreme of what I think is necessary or even should be talked about. And its not gonna pass."
She said that addressing the country's failing mental health system should be a bigger priority for Congress.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/06/heidi-heitkamp-gun-control_n_2420775.html
Lieberman may have gone home to Connecticut, but looks like there will always be folks to keep his spirit alive in D.C.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Remmah2
(3,291 posts)Guess we'll have a gun cabinet in the White House after all.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)The first AWB was enacted as a result of an unhappy businessman going into a major San Francisco law firm in 1993 and shooting up the place. It was an enclave for the rich and the super-rich.
Remmah2
(3,291 posts)The rich bastard 1%ers and corporate royalty will be the only ones with the ability to fortify their buildings.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Tempest
(14,591 posts)Look at NRA's web site. She received an A rating from them.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)statement "Buy more guns, we want your money!"
Undismayed
(76 posts)The gun industry is about a $12 billion industry. Just as a comparison, the golf industry is a $195 billion industry. Seems like you have a strong anti-industry bias and will quickly latch that onto any problem you encounter.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I know exactly what a dwarfed industry looks like: they show up monthly on our charge-off reports, and they ask us for more money.
mike dub
(541 posts)Here we have a new Senator from a state whose entire population is roughly that of the population of the city of Memphis, slamming gun control plans before they're even laid on the table. The A-rating makes sense; she has the NRA deflection thing down ... just blame the country's failing mental health system...or Hollywood, or videogames. Lame.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,044 posts)she's obviously not a liberal
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 7, 2013, 12:33 AM - Edit history (1)
Where almost every person is a hunter and sane too. Perhaps you want to wait for more details, or do a little homework first, then speak up.
Tempest
(14,591 posts)She's a conservative. Very conservative.
NickB79
(19,224 posts)She's from North Dakota, just how much do you think she could push her campaign left and still stay electable?
Unless you'd rather write off large swaths of this country that a moderate Democrat has a chance of winning, simply to be ideologically pure.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Jennicut
(25,415 posts)the best you will get.
http://www.diffen.com/difference/Heidi_Heitkamp_vs_Rick_Berg
ancianita
(35,932 posts)Cha
(296,824 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)health services without asking for cuts elsewhere?
That's the test. If not, they are not serious about better mental health services.
And I'm not sure that better mental health services will really do much.
That's rather simplistic. We have lots of depressed or even manic people, lots of mentally ill people who would never harm another person, not in their worst moments.
And then you get a sports hero who kills his girlfriend, wife and child.
Better mental health services would help our society but will not prevent gun violence to the extent that it needs to be prevented.
It's a bit of a red herring. Sorry to be a spoilsport, but Republicans won't fund this. They won't follow through on it. And better mental health services will miss the psychopaths some of whom are very good at pulling the wool over the eyes of psychologists, social workers and psychotherapists.
Mojorabbit
(16,020 posts)to mental health services might make a huge difference.
Joe Bacon
(5,163 posts)Here in California, we had an explosion of homeless after Reagan, Deukmejian and Wilson closed the state mental hospitals. And all of them, including Ah-Nold kept cutting mental health services in the state budget. Result--increased crime which led to prisons absorbing some of those who were kicked out of the state hospitals.
Paladin
(28,243 posts)They're OK with guns falling into the wrong hands, and they're OK with withholding the enormous funding it will take to bring the nation's mental health care system up to an effective access level.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Sigh.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Anyone who knows her, North Dakota, and its people and history would have known this. This is no surprise. Go all the way back to Quinten Burdick, and you will see the record. Sen. Burdick never supported gun control for obvious reasons, that would end a political career in North Dakota.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Just today in the New York Times there's an article about a Korean woman who's bought and brought back to life the local cafe in Minot. My best friend was born and bred in Minot. She is very much for an assault weapons ban and other gun control measures.
People change their minds, too. Gabby Gifford used to be an NRA supporter, too. you can bet that's changed.
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)Her opponent was a tea bagger. I suppose you don't like Sen. Casey (D-PA) just because he is pro-life. Democrats are a bigger tent than that.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)I'm just disappointed. Especially because we are in the moment where it is very easy to support basic gun legislation. Other new Dem senators with previous NRA ties are doing it.
And to call these proposed measures "extreme" is ... well ... extreme.
Joe Bacon
(5,163 posts)He's going to chair the Joint Economic Committee. I'd rather have Bob Casey as a Senator who crushed Rich Santorum than see Sicky Ricky in his fourth term.
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)While I don't agree with Casey on the abortion issue I am just fine with him as a Senator because I agree with him on much more than I disagree with him on. A different issue but the same applies to the new Democratic Senator from North Dakota.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)I mean shit, closing the gun show/private sale background check loophole is an obvious improvement. It's already the law here in CT.
CBHagman
(16,981 posts)Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-2043
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)CBHagman
(16,981 posts)...people who helped get her elected via one form of support or another will want to weigh in.
Moreover, she's newly elected, so the information itself is a recent development.
David__77
(23,329 posts)This new senator from ND is a progressive.
KeepinItReal4u
(4 posts)Assault weapons are illegal in CT. but this horrific event still took place
"Sec. 53-202b. Sale or transfer of assault weapon prohibited. Class C felony. (a)(1) Any person who, within this state, distributes, transports or imports into the state, keeps for sale, or offers or exposes for sale, or who gives any assault weapon, except as provided by sections 29-37j and 53-202a to 53-202k, inclusive, and subsection (h) of section 53a-46a, shall be guilty of a class C felony and shall be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of which two years may not be suspended or reduced."
source : http://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/Chap943.htm#Sec53-202a.htm
CT. has some of the nations strictest laws and not one of them prevented the mentally ill person from committing the crime
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2012/12/17/connecticut-gun-laws-among-the-nations-strictest/
xtraxritical
(3,576 posts)Remmah2
(3,291 posts)102 years? Semi-automatics were used for hunting long before WWII.
(Hatcher's Notes.)
KeepinItReal4u
(4 posts)FBI reports more people killed with hammers and clubs than rifles and shotguns.
Lets focus on controlling hammers and clubs since they kill more
http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/01/03/fbi-hammers-clubs-kill-more-people-than-rifles-shotguns/
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)So what is your point or do you have one?
Response to KeepinItReal4u (Reply #23)
Post removed
ancianita
(35,932 posts)groundloop
(11,513 posts)As should the reporter who wrote the piece you linked to. There were 679 deaths from shotguns and rifles, 6220 by handguns, and only 496 from "blunt objects". Also, since when are "blunt objects" the same as hammers and clubs?
Take your bullshit nit-picking of facts somewhere else.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)Let's not forget handguns, the most precious of Precious of gun humpers, which killed almost 7,000 people.
God, what a STUPID post.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I'm sure Mark Begich is totally in agreement with her.
Comrade_McKenzie
(2,526 posts)And that goes for every gun nut in this party.
We might be a big tent, but it's time to install idiot detectors at the entrances and make the exit signs bigger and brighter.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)graham4anything
(11,464 posts)and primary her out next time.
that is why change is going to take 6 years, til everyone is running again, and we can get all the pro-gun people out.
first we have to win the house back, but then primary all of the pro-gun people out
and do so with all the pro-gun in the senate
hope mike bloomberg's staff is keeping tally and notes on this.
NickB79
(19,224 posts)Fuck, short of literally buying votes, how do you expect Bloomberg's money to make a bit of difference there?
Do people simply not realize there are large portions of this country that are strongly against gun control, no matter how much money you spend on election advertisements and radio ads?
first we have to win the house back, but then primary all of the pro-gun people out
and do so with all the pro-gun in the senate
And I'm sure all 80 million gun owners in this country will just sit back and ignore this while it's happening, right? They won't start sending millions of dollars in new contributions to the NRA? All those working-class union members in Ohio that enjoy hunting and shooting, for example, that the Democratic Party relies on, will be just fine with all this?
If I had to make a bet, I'd say that we'll probably have MORE pro-gun members in the House and Senate 6 years from now, because this is starting to look more and more like the 1994 fiasco.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)1994 didn't have social media and didn't have Bloomberg, the Great Equalizer.
candidates in 2014 won't be afraid of the NRA anymore
and we don't need 100%.
Just about a movement of less than 50.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Some women who have been violently raped now own firearms in their homes.
Imagine that. Who would have thought?
All you have to do is convince them that "it's all the NRA's fault," they should willingly give up their right to defend themselves in their homes, and/or stay home during the next elections.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)a woman's rights to an abortion.
Funny thing is
the NRA really is a terrorist organization, and cowards too.
Hiding behind a women, when there million other excuses have now all been debunked.
but again-
even if what you said made any sense(which it doesn't)-
why would someone need to have a gun in the street?
Keep the stinking gun in the house, but why in the street?
Why in a bar, a movie theatre, a shopping center?
You yourself just said all that is needed is for the house.
ah
well
oh
ah
well
yeah
but
no
yeah
oh
what
no
start discussion over trying to make like the question passed.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)i thought people had the right to vote for someone who would represent them at the local,state,and federal level. if so, i would say she is representing the people who elected her because they expect her to represent them on many issues concerning their lives.
it would seem that her idea has more weight in solving the problem in north dakota and across america than pissing off the people who voted for her.maybe we don`t need her vote on national issues.
ancianita
(35,932 posts)their interests connectable to those of the rest of the country? Aren't her votes supposed to enact the greatest good for the greatest number? Her state's people can still get their interests served under 'states' rights' positions without pressuring her to impose their values on 49 other states. If a red state Democrat's tenure is that fragile, and job scope that narrowly defined, then the party should push in those states for the country's larger interests.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)I suspect they are engineering a way to blame the repukes for the failure of reasonable gun control. Politics as usual.
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)I can't speak for her but suspect she would oppose anything beyond a couple of baby steps like improved background checks that would have done nothing in Newtown, CT.
NickB79
(19,224 posts)She's a Democrat from North Dakota, one of the most conservative states in the nation. She represents her constituents first and foremost; without their support she won't get re-elected. And her Democratic and moderate Republican constituents that voted into office are saying "NO" to most new gun control laws.
This pushback will be repeated by other Democrats from Midwestern, Southern, and Southwestern states with high rates of gun ownership, make no mistake. Gun ownership is not solely a Republican domain; millions of gun owners vote Democrat as well.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)further slaughter.
A. Lanza had access to the best health care money could buy. Mentally disturbed people have always been with us, and will be in the future.
Only in America can the mentally ill get their hands on arsenals of lethal weapons and hundreds of bullets -- in their own basements, no less. Only in America do we have routine, recurrent gun massacres.
As long as Americans have the constitutional right to have arsenals of mass death in their basements, the gun massacres will continue.
No civilized country tolerates routine gun massacres. All Americans who love our country should want America to end the slaughter and join the ranks of civilized countries.
Repeal the blood soaked Second Amendment Now. Then implement REAL, effective gun reform and End the Gun Massacres.
ButterflyBlood
(12,644 posts)Sheesh next thing we might learn that lawmakers from Maine tend to support policies that benefit the lobster fishing industry.
maxsolomon
(33,244 posts)Good to know there will be an open debate.
Blasphemer
(3,261 posts)The white house has to begin with the most extreme proposal possible knowing full well that it won't pass and it will have to be negotiated down to something that can pass. There's no reason to start with a weak proposal.
Cha
(296,824 posts)pimp for the nra. Taking the nra against the WH.