Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,983 posts)
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:44 AM Jan 2013

Town Takes Down Anti-Hispanic Signs After Public Outrage

Source: Think Progress

Town Takes Down Anti-Hispanic Signs After Public Outrage
By Adam Peck on Jan 7, 2013 at 10:30 am


.............

The small community of Milford, Delaware took swift action over the weekend after a barrage of criticism over signs posted in several public parks that appeared to be anti-Hispanic.

A Daily Kos blogger documented a number of signs that read “parental or guardian supervision is requried for the use of this playground equipment” in English, but warned Spanish-speakers “ustedes debe tener un permiso para jugar en este campo,” or that visitors must obtain a permit in order to play in this park. It goes on to warn that violators of this rule could be subjected to police action.

The sign was repeated in at least four different locations around the town, and according to Daily Kos blogger Delaware Dem, they were all posted in neighborhoods with sizable Hispanic populations.

Conservative radio host Dan Gaffney was the first to publicize the story, posting a photo of one sign on his Facebook page. From there it began to circulate widely until the local newspaper The Wilmington News Journal posted their own story on Sunday.
http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20130106/NEWS/301060075?gcheck=1&nclick_check=1

Read more: http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/01/07/1405111/delaware-town-takes-down-anti-hispanic-signs-after-public-outrage/

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Town Takes Down Anti-Hispanic Signs After Public Outrage (Original Post) kpete Jan 2013 OP
They should have just translated the Spanish into the English version. onehandle Jan 2013 #1
The one thing that stuck out to me Tempest Jan 2013 #2
I haven't seen anything EC Jan 2013 #3
the most logical explanation Celebration Jan 2013 #5
I agree... thesquanderer Jan 2013 #7
I'd buy that if they also copied the English sign. jeff47 Jan 2013 #11
actually this tha PatrynXX Jan 2013 #4
Who suggested those signs? Who approved those signs? That's what I'd like to know nt Sarah Ibarruri Jan 2013 #6
People that anxious to threaten others shouldn't be protected from public awareness. n/t Judi Lynn Jan 2013 #9
No racism intended Kelvin Mace Jan 2013 #8
Except that excuse makes no sense. jeff47 Jan 2013 #12
The could read the benign English version Kelvin Mace Jan 2013 #14
“I certainly assume there was not an intent to discriminate,” Kohel said. Courtesy Flush Jan 2013 #10
How sad obama2terms Jan 2013 #13

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
1. They should have just translated the Spanish into the English version.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:51 AM
Jan 2013

After all, public parks are Socialism.

Tempest

(14,591 posts)
2. The one thing that stuck out to me
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 12:14 PM
Jan 2013

"Conservative Dan Gaffney".

I guess there are some sane ones out there.

EC

(12,287 posts)
3. I haven't seen anything
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 12:40 PM
Jan 2013

telling us how those signs got made and posted. Were they ok'd by officials? Was it someone on their own at the print shop? Why were they made and why were they posted?

Celebration

(15,812 posts)
5. the most logical explanation
Reply to EC (Reply #3)
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:53 PM
Jan 2013

was that they copied Spanish signs from the sports fields, that DO require a permit. This seems to have been done by someone that doesn't know Spanish. I mean, it could all be a consipiracy, but more likely a stupid mistake.

thesquanderer

(11,986 posts)
7. I agree...
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 02:23 PM
Jan 2013

As the saying goes, "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
11. I'd buy that if they also copied the English sign.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 05:43 PM
Jan 2013

Yet they didn't. Thus said person was well aware that the Spanish sign was not matching the English sign.

PatrynXX

(5,668 posts)
4. actually this tha
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 01:06 PM
Jan 2013

Horseshit is also offensive to English speaking people. It just builds into a stereotype that if they aren't speaking English they must not want us to know what they are talking about

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
8. No racism intended
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 03:35 PM
Jan 2013

just the kind of mistake that can be made when folks can't read Spanish.

There ARE signs threatening police action in English at some locations. Someone paired a Spanish version of the sign with an English version that did not.

http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/playground.asp



jeff47

(26,549 posts)
12. Except that excuse makes no sense.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 05:45 PM
Jan 2013

Even if the person ordering the signs did not speak Spanish, they had to order a copy of the "field" sign. They could presumably read the English version of the "field" sign. Thus they knew what they were getting even if they could not read Spanish.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
14. The could read the benign English version
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 07:57 PM
Jan 2013

but not the more restrictive Spanish version. So, they are putting up the signs and somebody grabs a Spanish sign and has no idea what it says.

Sorry, as Snopes points out, this looks like an honest mistake.

Also, most racist politicians, when caught, have to be dragged kicking and screaming to do the right thing. These folks acted as soon as they learned of the problem.

Courtesy Flush

(4,558 posts)
10. “I certainly assume there was not an intent to discriminate,” Kohel said.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 04:31 PM
Jan 2013

Yeah, let's all assume that. I feel better now.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Town Takes Down Anti-Hisp...