Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 03:18 PM Jan 2013

Barry Bonds Not Elected To Hall of Fame

Source: NBC Bay Area

Judgment day has arrived for former Giants slugger Barry Bonds to find out if his Hall of Fame fate and the vote was a big fat no.

Read more: http://www.nbcbayarea.com/blogs/the-cove/Barry-Bonds-Not-Elected-to-Hall-of-Fame-186198441.html



The news came over the wire just a few minutes ago. Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, and Sammy Sosa were not elected to the MLB Hall of Fame. In addition, no one on this years ballot was elected. Therefore, it seems no one will be inducted into the Hall of Fame this year.
66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Barry Bonds Not Elected To Hall of Fame (Original Post) erpowers Jan 2013 OP
Disgusting. KatyMan Jan 2013 #1
The players? Tempest Jan 2013 #5
Well, those writers KatyMan Jan 2013 #18
Doubt is not proof Tempest Jan 2013 #21
Why not Bagwell? KatyMan Jan 2013 #25
It was more like a big fat HELL NO! Tempest Jan 2013 #2
"I'm probably in the minority, but...." klook Jan 2013 #29
Can you imagine The Babe on steroids? Tempest Jan 2013 #33
he could have set those records if he just layed off the party lifestyle! frylock Jan 2013 #35
He used to eat hotdogs in the damn dugout! MADem Jan 2013 #39
LOL, really klook Jan 2013 #43
The NIT pre-dates the NCAA Jimbo S Jan 2013 #65
Ah, thanks -- I was mis-remembering my hoops history klook Jan 2013 #66
1996 was the last year no one was inducted.... a kennedy Jan 2013 #3
Asterisk* nt longship Jan 2013 #4
Was Pete Rose on the ballot? Brother Buzz Jan 2013 #6
IMO what Pete Rose did is far less objectionable than cheating on the game by using steroids n/t Leopolds Ghost Jan 2013 #8
I don't disagree Brother Buzz Jan 2013 #9
Really? trumad Jan 2013 #10
Agree with you here, it's intolerable. nt rivegauche Jan 2013 #16
No evidence he threw games Tempest Jan 2013 #23
There is plenty of evidence that he bet on his own team. trumad Jan 2013 #31
Once again... Tempest Jan 2013 #34
LOL--- trumad Jan 2013 #44
He only admitted to betting on his own team to win groundloop Jan 2013 #37
He admitted after years of denial... trumad Jan 2013 #46
I never said he has credibility, I don't even like him groundloop Jan 2013 #60
So he bets a lot when he lets them lose. And he bets a little when he helps them win. El Supremo Jan 2013 #49
Bet ON is fine--bet AGAINST would be a problem... nt MADem Jan 2013 #40
There's evidence he bet for is team, not against it. jeff47 Jan 2013 #41
Wow---you guys just don't get it. trumad Jan 2013 #48
No, I'm not saying that at all jeff47 Jan 2013 #55
How do you know he didn't bet against his team? trumad Jan 2013 #59
Same reason I know he hasn't murdered anyone jeff47 Jan 2013 #61
And no has produced any evidence that he hasn't. trumad Jan 2013 #62
Rose is much worse IMHO. Are_grits_groceries Jan 2013 #42
I'm stunned that some don't get it. trumad Jan 2013 #50
Easy solution to the Rose conundrum KamaAina Jan 2013 #15
He wouldn't be a member as a manager because he wasn't a HoF manager anyway. hughee99 Jan 2013 #32
At some point he will be off that list. Renew Deal Jan 2013 #17
When he dies, he'll join a larger list of permanently ineligible players Brother Buzz Jan 2013 #27
Barry Bonds had a cloud over his head WHILE he was becoming famous. Leopolds Ghost Jan 2013 #7
Yawn ... it's a freaking children's game relayerbob Jan 2013 #11
The Freakin' Olympics ellisonz Jan 2013 #20
no, it's a men's game played by children.. frylock Jan 2013 #36
No Big Deal BlueManFan Jan 2013 #12
BALCO BALCO BALCO BALCO BALCO BALCO BlueManFan Jan 2013 #13
All of them could be in the 'Roids Hall of Shame. rivegauche Jan 2013 #14
Babe Ruth's Vices... Sophiegirl Jan 2013 #19
Ty Cobb, Tris Speaker, Cap Anson... KatyMan Jan 2013 #22
Hot dogs, beer and women. n/t Tempest Jan 2013 #24
I like what Lewis Black said: forget the performance enhancing drugs... Initech Jan 2013 #28
Yeah....the downfall of many ML players. nt Sophiegirl Jan 2013 #30
Excellent, fuck the sterioud abusers. Initech Jan 2013 #26
I think this was Jenoch Jan 2013 #38
A long as you get 5% of the vote each year, you remain on the ballot for 15 years. n/t FSogol Jan 2013 #45
I choose not to do roids when playing Triple A. Many other players did. WhoWoodaKnew Jan 2013 #47
why in the hell did`t they elect other players? madrchsod Jan 2013 #51
I seem to remember this... AsahinaKimi Jan 2013 #52
Get ready to throw your peanuts and Cracker Jacks at me... Kalidurga Jan 2013 #53
It's an disadvantage to players trying to make the team that choose not to use. WhoWoodaKnew Jan 2013 #63
*Good n/t Pachamama Jan 2013 #54
Yes it is. 840high Jan 2013 #56
Good. AngryOldDem Jan 2013 #57
who the hell cares dembotoz Jan 2013 #58
Roids or not, Bonds is a first ballot. MrSlayer Jan 2013 #64

KatyMan

(4,183 posts)
1. Disgusting.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 03:29 PM
Jan 2013

Biggio deserved it. So did Bagwell. So did Piazza. Baseball writers are a bunch of hacks. The voting should be done by the players.

Tempest

(14,591 posts)
5. The players?
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 03:31 PM
Jan 2013

What do they know about the stats of MLB players?

The writers are the ones who pour over stats and data, not players.

Under your system, it would become a popularity contest.

And Piazza is also on the list of steroid users.

KatyMan

(4,183 posts)
18. Well, those writers
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 03:59 PM
Jan 2013

were more than happy to vote a half dozen MVPs to Bonds and Cy Youngs to Clemens, and you'd have to have lived under a rock to not know there was a supplement issue in MLB in the 90s and beyond. Who didn't know McGwire and Sosa were juicing in 98?
I don't know about Piazza, but Biggio was certainly never implicated, and neither was Bagwell.

Tempest

(14,591 posts)
21. Doubt is not proof
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 04:05 PM
Jan 2013

The proof wasn't until after they finished their careers.

"but Biggio was certainly never implicated, and neither was Bagwell."

Biggio I agree with you, Bagwell not so much. As far as their snubs, that is.

KatyMan

(4,183 posts)
25. Why not Bagwell?
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 04:07 PM
Jan 2013

Played a large part of his career in the Dome, where home runs go to die.
If one thinks Frank Thomas is HoF'er, then you have to believe Bags is.

Tempest

(14,591 posts)
2. It was more like a big fat HELL NO!
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 03:29 PM
Jan 2013

Bonds was one of several players who had a cloud of steroids shrouding his candidacy into the Hall of Fame. He received 36.2 percent of the vote. He needed 75-percent.

Former Oakland A's slugger Mark McGuire was also on the ballot. He only received 16.9 percent of the vote.

Also on the ballot for the first time were Sammy Sosa and Mike Piazza, power hitters whose statistics have been questioned because of the Steroids Era, and Craig Biggio, 20th on the career list with 3,060 hits all for the Houston Astros.

klook

(12,152 posts)
29. "I'm probably in the minority, but...."
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 04:14 PM
Jan 2013

Last edited Thu Jan 10, 2013, 03:04 PM - Edit history (1)




Biggio will get in eventually, although I'm surprised he wasn't a first-ballot choice. I doubt seriously he ever juiced.

Hardly anybody likes Bonds, and hardly anybody believes he didn't use steroids, so -- despite what would be a HOF career for most players, he may never get in. I always thought it was hypocritical of the Giants to keep him on the team and promote (and benefit from) his hitting prowess but then try to remove every trace of him after his career was over.

Maybe somebody will start a Hall of Infamy for guys like Pete Rose, Bonds, and Clemens.

Tempest

(14,591 posts)
33. Can you imagine The Babe on steroids?
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 04:22 PM
Jan 2013

He'd have set every offensive record that would still be standing today.

klook

(12,152 posts)
43. LOL, really
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 05:01 PM
Jan 2013

What if some of these guys just didn't drink as much?


(George Steinbrenner recommends a remedy to Billy Martin)

klook

(12,152 posts)
66. Ah, thanks -- I was mis-remembering my hoops history
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 02:59 PM
Jan 2013

about the Marquette decision to go to the NIT instead of the NCAA tourney. I'll correct my post above.

Brother Buzz

(36,389 posts)
6. Was Pete Rose on the ballot?
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 03:34 PM
Jan 2013

Pete Rose should not be the only living baseball player on the permanently ineligible list.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
10. Really?
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 03:42 PM
Jan 2013

Disagree 100 percent. Throwing games because you gamble on them. Do you know how fast the integrity of the game would fly out the window?

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
31. There is plenty of evidence that he bet on his own team.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 04:18 PM
Jan 2013

Actually he admitted it.

Do you not see the problem with this?

Once fans think that the game is rigged, it's all over. Period.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
44. LOL---
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 05:31 PM
Jan 2013

Betting on your own team is a bannable offense in Baseball.

Always has been always will.

How do you know he didn't throw games? You know he bet on his team--- How do you know he didn't bet against?

And there is the quandry.

Guess what---it he never ever bet on his team--- then your argument holds much better.

groundloop

(11,514 posts)
37. He only admitted to betting on his own team to win
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 04:44 PM
Jan 2013

Rose claims he never, ever bet on his team to lose.



groundloop

(11,514 posts)
60. I never said he has credibility, I don't even like him
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 09:39 PM
Jan 2013

I was just stating facts.

And for the record, I do not think Pete Rose should be allowed in the Hall of Fame because he broke the rules.

El Supremo

(20,365 posts)
49. So he bets a lot when he lets them lose. And he bets a little when he helps them win.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 05:40 PM
Jan 2013

Same difference.

But I don't believe him anyway.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
41. There's evidence he bet for is team, not against it.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 04:51 PM
Jan 2013

So where's the conflict of interest in that? He's trying to win as both a player and a bettor.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
48. Wow---you guys just don't get it.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 05:36 PM
Jan 2013

He denied for years that he didn't bet on his team---and now you all are in that he's honest Pete.

Who is to say that if good old Pete didn't get caught---he kept on betting, ran up big gambling debts to loan sharks, and then was told to throw games to make up for his losses.

When you are a degenerate gambler, you're much more susceptible to that kind of shit.




jeff47

(26,549 posts)
55. No, I'm not saying that at all
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 08:36 PM
Jan 2013

Your claim is he could have thrown a game to win a bet.

He didn't bet against his team.

His incentives to win the bet and win the game were aligned.

Who is to say that if good old Pete didn't get caught---he kept on betting, ran up big gambling debts to loan sharks, and then was told to throw games to make up for his losses.

And he could have raped innocent virgin puppies while guzzling Mad Dog and shooting heroin into his eyeballs.

He didn't do that. Nor throw a game.

So why should we punish him as if he had?
 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
59. How do you know he didn't bet against his team?
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 09:05 PM
Jan 2013

Because Pete said so?

Again---he was a degenerate gambler...yes? You would think the chance of losing his legacy---knowing that betting on your own team would be the end of you....which it was--- would be the deterrent. It obviously was not.

Why---because he was a gambling addict.

And again---there lies the problem.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
61. Same reason I know he hasn't murdered anyone
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 01:36 AM
Jan 2013

No one has produced any evidence that he has.

Perhaps we should just execute him? After all, he could have murdered a bus load of nuns. Sure, he says he hasn't, but are you gonna take his word?

The guy was a hall-of-fame quality player, didn't harm the sport like the steroid abusers or the black socks, and nobody has provided any evidence his bets changed how he played or managed. The fact that people are shocked - SHOCKED I tell you - by his behavior says a lot more about them than him.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
62. And no has produced any evidence that he hasn't.
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 07:13 AM
Jan 2013

Buth there is plenty of evidence that he broke a major bannable rule in baseball.

Again---the reasons I listed above in mho are sufficient.

Are_grits_groceries

(17,111 posts)
42. Rose is much worse IMHO.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 04:59 PM
Jan 2013

What Rose did cuts to the heart of the game and anybody's ability to believe in it. By betting while managing, he could directly manipulate the outcome. He might swing it one way or the other without even realizing it.
I am no fan of steroid users. However, they still have to have a modicum of talent to hit the ball. In addition, the outcome they can consistently produce is not guaranteed.
Rose couldn't guarantee an outcome, but with the ability to move and/ or remove players, he could really affect it.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
50. I'm stunned that some don't get it.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 05:40 PM
Jan 2013

Again---You know at the end the guy was addicted to gambling---betting on his own team and risking the chance of losing his legacy.

So---when you become a degenerate, you act like a degenerate. You begin to double, triple your bets, and eventually you will be so far down you will be forced to change up your tactics to try and cover your losses.

Bookies, loan sharks, etc..... they'll sink you teeth into you so fast you won't know what hit you.

That right there is why there is a strict no gambling rule in Professional sports.

Once you hit that slippery slope there no putting on the breaks.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
15. Easy solution to the Rose conundrum
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 03:54 PM
Jan 2013

there are several men who are in as managers but not as players, e.g. Sparky Anderson. Induct Rose as a player only, and make it clear why he is not a member as a manager right on his plaque.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
32. He wouldn't be a member as a manager because he wasn't a HoF manager anyway.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 04:21 PM
Jan 2013

He managed from 84-89 and didn't win the World series, pennant, or even the NL West (their division at the time) once.

If I was Sparky Anderson, I'd be pissed if there was a plaque that said the only reason Rose wasn't a HoF manager was because of the gambling. Rose was no more a "HoF manager" than Bob Uecker was a "HoF catcher", he just wasn't that good at it.

Brother Buzz

(36,389 posts)
27. When he dies, he'll join a larger list of permanently ineligible players
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 04:09 PM
Jan 2013

Today, he is the only living baseball player on the permanently ineligible list. I suggest there should be other players on that list to keep Pete Rose company.

relayerbob

(6,537 posts)
11. Yawn ... it's a freaking children's game
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 03:43 PM
Jan 2013

Played by people making far too much money. NHL lockout could stay on indefinitely too ASFAIC, too violent.

Stick with Olympic sports and be done with it.

(besides, I'm more impressed with people like Babe Ruth who performed his feats with performance degrading drugs)

frylock

(34,825 posts)
36. no, it's a men's game played by children..
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 04:43 PM
Jan 2013

and lol at "Olympic sports." can't wait for the big marathon being televised this weekend!

BlueManFan

(256 posts)
12. No Big Deal
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 03:49 PM
Jan 2013

his swollen steroid engorged head wouldn't fit through the doorway anyhow! Allegedly....ha ha ha!!!!!!

rivegauche

(601 posts)
14. All of them could be in the 'Roids Hall of Shame.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 03:54 PM
Jan 2013

I think any athlete who used steroids should never even be considered for the HOF. It shoul dbe an automatic disqualifier.

Sophiegirl

(2,338 posts)
19. Babe Ruth's Vices...
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 04:00 PM
Jan 2013

...were hotdogs and beer!!!!!

No better performance enhancing drug than a good ballpark frank with lots of mustard, onions and relish. And one's beer of choice.

A player can be a..uhm...drunk...but one might think that if he laid off the booze, his stats would be completely unreachable. On the other hand, maybe some good intestinal pressure and the "relaxation" caused by the beer actually made him play better. Relaxed when batting and a great big ole fart when swinging may have given the ball a reason to escape...and the best place to hide was in the centerfield stands.

Runaway.....Flee!!!!!

Initech

(100,043 posts)
28. I like what Lewis Black said: forget the performance enhancing drugs...
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 04:10 PM
Jan 2013

And bring back the performance hindering ones!!

 

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)
38. I think this was
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 04:49 PM
Jan 2013

Biggio's first year on the ballot. Jack Morris has only one more year on the ballot before he goes to the veteran's committee. Although he didn't win 300 games, he was a dominant pitcher throughout most of his career. I hope he gets in next year.

FSogol

(45,455 posts)
45. A long as you get 5% of the vote each year, you remain on the ballot for 15 years. n/t
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 05:32 PM
Jan 2013

All of them got over 5%.

WhoWoodaKnew

(847 posts)
47. I choose not to do roids when playing Triple A. Many other players did.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 05:34 PM
Jan 2013

They made the show. I started selling insurance.

madrchsod

(58,162 posts)
51. why in the hell did`t they elect other players?
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 05:42 PM
Jan 2013

there`s a few players that deserve the hall of fame.

the people who vote should be ashamed of themselves.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
53. Get ready to throw your peanuts and Cracker Jacks at me...
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 05:58 PM
Jan 2013

But, I don't think the steroid use is a big deal. I think it's wrong as far as the players health is concerned. There are estimates that up to 50% of MLB players use steroids. I doubt it is that high myself, I would think the most would be 40% but it's probably closer to 25%. But, here is a theoretical for you. If half the players are using how is it an advantage to be using? It's very likely half the players on the other team are using as well, so then what, you still have to rely on your skill as a player. So, why don't we do this. If a player wants to use they have to disclose their use to the world. They also have to agree to have their stats adjusted.

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
57. Good.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 08:53 PM
Jan 2013

None of them deserve to go. It would be a huge slap in the face to every player who has been inducted.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
64. Roids or not, Bonds is a first ballot.
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 08:11 AM
Jan 2013

And I hate that guy, absolutely hate him. This is a joke. Rocket is a first balloter too.

The whole steroids controversy is idiotic.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Barry Bonds Not Elected T...