Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,331 posts)
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 05:45 PM Jan 2013

Clarence Thomas breaks long silence during Supreme Court oral arguments

Source: Washington Post

Justice Clarence Thomas broke his nearly seven-year silence at Supreme Court oral arguments Monday. But no one is sure exactly what he said.

Thomas seemed to be making a light-hearted joke about lawyers trained at his alma mater Yale Law School or its rival, Harvard. But several justices were speaking and laughing at the time, and the court reporter lost Thomas’s comments during the cross talk.

His comments came during questions about the qualifications of lawyers who had represented a Louisiana man in a murder case. Justice Antonin Scalia noted that one of the lawyers had attended Harvard and another had gone to Yale.


Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/clarence-thomas-breaks-long-silence-during-supreme-court-oral-arguments/2013/01/14/a7c6023c-5e7a-11e2-9940-6fc488f3fecd_story.html



I always say nothing helps break the tension of a capital murder case like some well-timed humor...
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clarence Thomas breaks long silence during Supreme Court oral arguments (Original Post) brooklynite Jan 2013 OP
Are they sure it wasn't a*grunt* mistaken for a word? TheCowsCameHome Jan 2013 #1
Candidate for this year's "You Call This NEWS?" Awards rocktivity Jan 2013 #2
well, since that scum has not uttered a word during oral arguments in seven years, it might be niyad Jan 2013 #4
Jay and Silent Bob. "No ticket!" Buzz Clik Jan 2013 #3
Maybe he was just being prudent Wolf Frankula Jan 2013 #5
That was my first thought Plucketeer Jan 2013 #11
Like the two Darryls talking on Newhart bluestateguy Jan 2013 #6
And yet, he still had nothing to say.. blueclown Jan 2013 #7
"a proposition capable of refutation" DreamGypsy Jan 2013 #8
Thomas Was Asking Scalia For Permission To Take A Leak. (nt) Paladin Jan 2013 #9
+1,000 Scuba Jan 2013 #12
Anita Hill: 'It was worth it' bemildred Jan 2013 #10
What a real brain trust, that Clarence Thomas CE5 Jan 2013 #13
Nah!! They couldn't hear what he said because it was a snore. longship Jan 2013 #14
20+ years and counting of this RW shill NICO9000 Jan 2013 #15
What'd he do? AlbertCat Jan 2013 #16
He finally opens his mouth, and, proves he's stupid. Festivito Jan 2013 #17
He finally woke up, huh? nt NoGOPZone Jan 2013 #18
Was catching up on "Scandal" program question everything Jan 2013 #19
Slappy found his voice Eagle_Eye Jan 2013 #20
He belched and farted... and then he woke up. undeterred Jan 2013 #21
I read that Joe Biden had something to do with getting Thomas this gig. blkmusclmachine Jan 2013 #22
Dilbert joke? ThoughtCriminal Jan 2013 #23
Let's think about this: the highest court in the land, in the midst of daily arguments LuckyLib Jan 2013 #24
"Who has put pubic hair on my Coke?" Kablooie Jan 2013 #25
He should probably go back to taking Twain's advice.... MADem Jan 2013 #26
If only he'd be silent on Mosanto cases, having worked for them in the past. Fire Walk With Me Jan 2013 #27

TheCowsCameHome

(40,167 posts)
1. Are they sure it wasn't a*grunt* mistaken for a word?
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 05:47 PM
Jan 2013

It isn't like CokeCanClarence to utter anything intelligible.

niyad

(113,049 posts)
4. well, since that scum has not uttered a word during oral arguments in seven years, it might be
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 05:51 PM
Jan 2013

considered news.

Wolf Frankula

(3,598 posts)
5. Maybe he was just being prudent
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 05:51 PM
Jan 2013

After all, 'It is better to be silent and to be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.'

Wolf

DreamGypsy

(2,252 posts)
8. "a proposition capable of refutation"
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 06:36 PM
Jan 2013

From the New York Times report:

Justice Thomas leaned into his microphone, and in the midst of a great deal of cross talk among the justices, cracked a joke. Or so it seemed to people in the courtroom.

The official transcript confirms that Justice Thomas spoke, for the first time since Feb 22, 2006. It attributes these words to him, after a follow-up comment from Justice Scalia concerning a male graduate of Harvard Law School: “Well – he did not —.” That is all the transcript recites.

Though the transcription is incomplete, people in the courtroom understood him to say that a law degree from Yale may actually be proof of incompetence.

<snip>

And the lawyer at the lectern, a Louisiana prosecutor named Carla S. Sigler, responded, “I would refute that, Justice Thomas,” indicating that the justice had articulated a proposition capable of refutation. Ms. Sigler had said earlier that the Yale lawyer was “a very impressive attorney.”


bemildred

(90,061 posts)
10. Anita Hill: 'It was worth it'
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 06:50 PM
Jan 2013

In the documentary "Anita," which premieres at the Sundance Film Festival in four sold-out screenings beginning Saturday, Academy Award-winning filmmaker Freida Mock focuses her lens on law professor Anita Hill (who hadn't yet seen the film at press time). More than 20 years after Hill accused then-Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment in turbulent Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, Hill is an author, professor of social policy, law and women's studies at Brandeis University's Heller School of Social Policy and Management and a frequent speaker on sexual discrimination and civil rights.

Was it worth it — "it" being the hard times you went through because of the hearings and the aftermath? Looking at it from 2013, was it worth what you went through to be where you are today?

In 1991, when I was called to testify — I was actually subpoenaed — I set myself a goal to truthfully talk about the experience I had with Clarence Thomas because I thought, and I still think, that it reflected on his ability to be an impartial judge in any case involving the law, but certainly any case involving civil rights, inequality issues. Having done that, yes, it was worth it. I have no regrets.

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/moviesnow/la-et-mn-anita-hill-conversation-20130113,0,191725.story

NICO9000

(970 posts)
15. 20+ years and counting of this RW shill
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 07:23 PM
Jan 2013

So disgraceful that Thurgood Marshall's position was filled by this idiot.

question everything

(47,431 posts)
19. Was catching up on "Scandal" program
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 09:07 PM
Jan 2013

and the one before the break had a flashback of an African American Justice administers the oath of office to the newly elected president. And I was thinking - can't be Thomas. No one even knows how he sounds. I did not know it was seven years. I though it was 20 years, since he was confirmed.

Eagle_Eye

(1,439 posts)
20. Slappy found his voice
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 09:34 PM
Jan 2013

He finished a sentence he started seven years ago, only nobody could remember the subject.

LuckyLib

(6,817 posts)
24. Let's think about this: the highest court in the land, in the midst of daily arguments
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 11:54 PM
Jan 2013

and questions, refuses to speak or engage any participating attorneys or his colleagues. WTF? You mean we have to pass a law to be sure that if you are a sitting justice and you refuse to speak we can oust you? It's an insult to his peers, the legal professional, and the entire nation. Not that he would have anything much to say of import anyway, but it might give us some indication of brain functioning -- or not.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
26. He should probably go back to taking Twain's advice....
Tue Jan 15, 2013, 03:46 AM
Jan 2013
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Clarence Thomas breaks lo...