Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

formercia

(18,479 posts)
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 09:51 PM Mar 2013

Federal judge rules surveillance provisions unconstitutional

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Tx4obama (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Yahoo




By Bernard Vaughan | Reuters – 1 hr 31 mins ago



By Bernard Vaughan
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal judge has ruled unconstitutional national security provisions that permit federal investigators to access customer information from some companies without court approval.
The provisions "suffer from significant constitutional infirmities," and violate the First Amendment and separation of powers, Judge Susan Illston of the District Court for the Northern District of California wrote in an order on Thursday.
The judge's decision stems from a "National Security Letter" that the Federal Bureau of Investigation issued to an unnamed telecommunications company, according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
The National Security Letter provision of the Patriot Act expanded the FBI's authority to demand personal customer records from Internet service providers, financial institutions and credit companies without prior court approval, according to the American Civil Liberties Union.
The letter to the telecommunications company sought "subscriber information" from the company, and warned that the letter's disclosure could result "in a danger to the United States," among other ramifications, according to the decision.

--snip--



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/federal-judge-rules-surveillance-provisions-unconstitutional-001457869--finance.html 



This is a very big deal.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge rules surveillance provisions unconstitutional (Original Post) formercia Mar 2013 OP
Friday late good news dump? Very big deal, I agree! nt Mnemosyne Mar 2013 #1
Locking, sorry. LBN Dupe. Please continue discussion on LBN link below Tx4obama Mar 2013 #2

Mnemosyne

(21,363 posts)
1. Friday late good news dump? Very big deal, I agree! nt
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 09:54 PM
Mar 2013

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
2. Locking, sorry. LBN Dupe. Please continue discussion on LBN link below
Fri Mar 15, 2013, 09:57 PM
Mar 2013
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal judge rules surve...