Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Sun Jun 2, 2013, 05:17 AM Jun 2013

Russia blocks U.N. Security Council declaration on Syria's Qusair

Last edited Sun Jun 2, 2013, 07:32 AM - Edit history (1)

Source: Reuters

(Reuters) - Russia on Saturday blocked a U.N. Security Council declaration of alarm over the bloody siege of the Syrian town of al-Qusair by Syrian troops and Hezbollah guerrillas, Security Council diplomats said.

Britain, president of the 15-nation council, had circulated a draft statement to fellow members voicing "grave concern about the situation in al-Qusair, Syria, and in particular the impact on civilians of the ongoing fighting."

Qusair, near the Syrian-Lebanese border, is usually home to an estimated 30,000 people. Fighting for control of the town has raged for two weeks.

Council statements must be agreed unanimously. Russia blocked the draft text, saying it was "not advisable to speak out as the U.N. Security Council didn't when Qusair was taken by the opposition," a council diplomat said on condition of anonymity.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/02/us-syria-crisis-un-idUSBRE95100G20130602?feedType=RSS&virtualBrandChannel=11563



Syria conflict: Red Cross 'alarmed' over Qusair.

The Red Cross has expressed alarm over the situation in the besieged Syrian town of Qusair, and has appealed for immediate access to deliver aid.

Thousands of civilians are believed to be trapped as pro-government forces battle rebels, with medical supplies, food and water scarce.

Russia earlier blocked a UN "declaration of alarm" on Qusair.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22744286
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Russia blocks U.N. Security Council declaration on Syria's Qusair (Original Post) dipsydoodle Jun 2013 OP
There is one other John2 Jun 2013 #1
Oh... but they are ready to supply weapons jakeXT Jun 2013 #2
There is an exodus from insurgent-held areas to gov't-held areas. David__77 Jun 2013 #3
I don't know, John2 Jun 2013 #4
The UN are full of hypocrites rastaone Jun 2013 #5
I'm not fooled John2 Jun 2013 #6
ARE YOU MAD? SkyDaddy7 Jun 2013 #8
Far too many... UnseenUndergrad Jun 2013 #9
Syria to grant Red Cross access to Qusair when fighting over: TV Bosonic Jun 2013 #7
 

John2

(2,730 posts)
1. There is one other
Sun Jun 2, 2013, 05:38 AM
Jun 2013

solution, Britain and the Security Council can suggest, if they are so concerned about civilian life in this town. That is to tell the rebels in that town to surrender and lay down their arms. They can also provide arrangements with the Syrian military to evacuate civilians from the town, or give them safe passage and leave the rebels there, if the rebels refuse to surrender.They can start with women and children and old people. For humanitarian reasons, if I was the commander, that would be my message to the British and Security Council if they are truly worried about civilians and not trying to aid these rebels.

David__77

(23,329 posts)
3. There is an exodus from insurgent-held areas to gov't-held areas.
Sun Jun 2, 2013, 06:08 AM
Jun 2013

Not the other way around. The insurgents are angry because they are being wiped out in Qusayr, not civilians.

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
4. I don't know,
Sun Jun 2, 2013, 06:30 AM
Jun 2013

what is going on except the Syrian military and Hezbullah are kicking the rebels butts now. I'm just giving the British the benefit of the doubt. They are the ones claiming civilians are getting massacred. If this is so, tell the rebels to quit using civilians as human shields and surrender or come out and fight like men. Isn't that what they tell all terrorists?

 

rastaone

(57 posts)
5. The UN are full of hypocrites
Sun Jun 2, 2013, 08:36 AM
Jun 2013

Anyone remember when they were bombarding Qaddafi home town of Sitre (sp)? they pumped so much bullets and shells in it that environmentalist said the city will remain unlivable for at least a decade or more. If the Un wants to get any credibility in the future they will have to be sounding outrage when the side they support militarily assault civilian cities e.g their takeover of Alawaite Aleppo.

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
6. I'm not fooled
Sun Jun 2, 2013, 08:53 AM
Jun 2013

by the U.N. at all and how it operates. Every country does not have equal status in the U.N. Some Countries form blocks to control the U.N. decisions. Even though War is serious, I find the whole situation amusing. On one hand, one of their Allies that want Assad to go (Turkey's Prime Minister) calls his own people Hooligans and Dictators, when they accuse him of abuse. Should the U.N. now tell the Prime Minister of Turkey to step down? And if he doesn't, will they supply the crowd with arms?

Then you have this extremist religious lunatic, in Qatar, that acts like some medicine man,calling all Sunnis to converge on Quisar to battle Assad and Hezbulla because they are infidels, and worse than the West and Israel. So the U.N. says the World should support their battle against the infidels in Syria. Please forgive me, if I find this amusing.

SkyDaddy7

(6,045 posts)
8. ARE YOU MAD?
Sun Jun 2, 2013, 05:45 PM
Jun 2013

They would all be executed! The absurdity of some here on DU is beyond belief!! WOW?!?!

The Rebels deserve all the aid we & anyone else can give them...Or do you buy the Assad regimes BS excuse they are all terrorist? PLEASE!

UnseenUndergrad

(249 posts)
9. Far too many...
Mon Jun 3, 2013, 12:57 AM
Jun 2013

Last edited Mon Jun 3, 2013, 01:35 AM - Edit history (1)

It was like this on Libya as well. At the time, I thought it was reluctance to get into another war. Now... maybe some are just too eager to believe the worst about the west while excusing or justifying the misdeeds of... other actors.

For two years I have seen the trend in regards to the Arab Spring: suspicion, paranoia surrounding the West and it's supposed Imperialist involvements, a renewed push to take the "terrorist" label seriously after spending the last half of the Bush administration making fun of it.

I realize that this conflict is very much a struggle between (on one side) two governments of authoritarian goits along with at least one Shia Terrorist group being supplied with weapons by the Ruskies and (on the other side), a Rag-Tag collection of Secular fighters, moderate islamists, Al-Qaeda crazies and the occasional lunatic cannibal, supplied by several Sunni-controlled Gulf States, given hesitant sanction by the Turkish government and supported in theory by several European nations.

Given all this, I just can't let go of the silly feeling that it would be a rather bad thing all around if Assad came out of this still in control of anything larger than the Alawlite heartland.

Bosonic

(3,746 posts)
7. Syria to grant Red Cross access to Qusair when fighting over: TV
Sun Jun 2, 2013, 10:34 AM
Jun 2013

(Reuters) - Syria will allow the Red Cross to enter the besieged town of Qusair after military operations are over, Foreign Minister Walid al-Moualem told U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon on Sunday, state TV said.

U.N. humanitarian officials have called for an immediate ceasefire in Qusair, where President Bashar al-Assad's forces and Hezbollah fighters are battling to drive out rebels, saying 1,500 wounded people are in need of emergency medical treatment.

Moualem expressed surprise at the international concern over the fighting around Qusair, saying the world had been silent when rebels took over the town 18 months ago and that Syria was now clearing it of "terrorism".

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/02/us-syria-crisis-qusair-idUSBRE95108620130602

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Russia blocks U.N. Securi...