Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,308 posts)
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 08:01 PM Jun 2013

UK government backs three-person IVF

Source: BBC

The UK looks set to become the first country to allow the creation of babies using DNA from three people, after the government backed the IVF technique.

It will produce draft regulations later this year and the procedure could be offered within two years.

Experts say three-person IVF could eliminate debilitating and potentially fatal mitochondrial diseases that are passed on from mother to child.
...
However, it would result in babies having DNA from two parents and a tiny amount from a third donor as the mitochondria themselves have their own DNA.

Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-23079276



I can't see the 'ethical' objections to this. You inherit your mitochondria only from your mother, who got them from her mother, and so on. If they are copied perfectly, then you (and your siblings, if those copies were perfect too) have identical mitochondrial DNA. You may have mDNA identical (or as good as identical) to thousands of other people already (this was what enable them to check the identity of Richard III from his bones, for instance - they found a couple of pure-female-line descendants of his mother).

It's only when a deleterious mutation happens that a child's mitochondrial DNA becomes defective. So what this is doing is going back to some version of mDNA which functions OK. Our mDNA should look a lot like that of many people other than our parents - as well as our mothers'.

Can anyone here explain an ethical objection to this?
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UK government backs three-person IVF (Original Post) muriel_volestrangler Jun 2013 OP
The cost JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #1
PS JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #2
Of course you can - it's public news muriel_volestrangler Jun 2013 #3
Done JustAnotherGen Jun 2013 #5
I can't really see any Posteritatis Jun 2013 #4
Adam and Eve not Ana, Adam and Eve! There, there's your dumb-as-fuck "ethical objection" DRoseDARs Jun 2013 #6
Has Danny DeVito been reached for comment? Orrex Jun 2013 #7

JustAnotherGen

(31,813 posts)
1. The cost
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 08:05 PM
Jun 2013

Part of the Fertility Treadmill is the genetic testing. Even with insurance - we spent out of pocket $600 for the full panel.

One round of IVF with only two sets of DNA cost 13K in NJ. I can't imagine the cost of adding in another person's. Yikes!

JustAnotherGen

(31,813 posts)
2. PS
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 08:07 PM
Jun 2013

Do you mind if I post this at another site? I'm a member at Fertile Heart and the young uns in their 20's and who have time might find this interesting.

JustAnotherGen

(31,813 posts)
5. Done
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:20 PM
Jun 2013

I've connected there with a young American woman who married and now lives with a Brit in Galway. Since she isn't 30 yet - The UK won't pay for anything. . . Its been all out of pocket for them. But this is very good news for her. Thanks! She needs a little good news since they have a genetic issue at play on their journey.

I pm'd her since that method/ site denies infertility unless you don't have periods anymore.

Posteritatis

(18,807 posts)
4. I can't really see any
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 08:51 PM
Jun 2013

I anticipate lots of naturalistic fallacies, lots of "stay out of my gene pool," and lots of overpopulation wankery over it though.

 

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)
6. Adam and Eve not Ana, Adam and Eve! There, there's your dumb-as-fuck "ethical objection"
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 09:24 PM
Jun 2013

They aren't the most complex thinkers, so it isn't that hard to figure out their arguments against a medical procedure.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UK government backs three...