Former Port Authority exec files lawsuit to quash subpoena in GWB probe
Source: Bergen Record
David Wildstein, the executive at the center of the decision to close lanes at the entrance to the George Washington Bridge, filed a lawsuit in superior court today trying to quash the legislatures subpoena of his testimony, according to a spokesperson for the court.
The lawsuit said the subpoena is invalid for a number of reasons. Wildsteins lawyer, Alan Zegas, questioned the validity of Wisniewskis signature on the subpeona.
The lawsuit also questioned Wisniewskis ability to issue a subpoena for investigative purposes and said he had a conflict of interest in the case because as a lawyer, Wisniewski allegedly represented a firm with a financial stake in Port Authority business.
Wildstein has been subpoenaed to appear on Thursday before Assemblyman John Wisniewski, D-Middlesex, and the Assembly transportation committee to answer questions about the lane closures.
Read more: http://www.northjersey.com/news/Former_Port_Authority_exec_files_lawsuit_to_quash_subpoena_in_GWB_probe.html
How arrogant can these people be? The hearing will be tomorrow.
riversedge
(70,182 posts)Coincidence? something smells
.....Today, The Record published emails and other correspondence between Wildstein and members of Christies staff, implicating them in the decision to close the bridge. Wisniewski has said previously he wanted to question Wildstein to explain some of those conversations.
The lawsuit came on a day when Governor Christie has been silent about allegations that top senior staff played a role in a possible political decision to close the lanes.
- See more at: http://www.northjersey.com/news/Former_Port_Authority_exec_files_lawsuit_to_quash_subpoena_in_GWB_probe.html#sthash.vdQPG5b5.dpuf
George II
(67,782 posts)....this story has a life of it's own and keeps getting bigger by the minute.
It's just like any other scandal - bad enough as it is, the lies and cover-ups are even worse.
To borrow a phrase from one of the emails, "is it wrong that I am smiling?"
On another note, even the National Review - yes, the CONSERVATIVE National Review! - has come out with a scathing criticism of Christie!
Beacool
(30,247 posts)It doesn't surprise me that Christie canceled today his one public event and is hiding his ugly mug.
Hubert Flottz
(37,726 posts)GUILTY!
Baitball Blogger
(46,697 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...have retained CRIMINAL defense attorneys, I'd agree except for the "wee bit" part!
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Thanks for that info.
Hosnon
(7,800 posts)Javaman
(62,510 posts)notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)nt
Javaman
(62,510 posts)once they get that deal, the flood gates will open.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)call Kelly, then Wildstein, then christie and offer immunity from prosecution to the first one that comes forward and a promise to use the full weight of the law on the second place finisher.
My guess is Kelly will get there first because she has the most exposure. Wildstein may have did the deed; but it is clear that he did so on someone else's order ... the question is, "was it her order, Christie's order, or someone else's?"
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Put these fuckers on a spit and let 'em roast.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)You played with fire and got burned. Now face the consequences like a man.
Laxman
(2,419 posts)he's worried. Zegas is one of the lawyers of choice in NJ for the high-profile guilty. He'll kick and scream for a while, but eventually Wildstein will either flip on his master or go down.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Does this guy seriously that he will be able to keep the truth hidden?
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)"brass"!