KY Rep. Accidentally Fired Gun In State Capitol: 'I Am A Gun Owner. It Happens'
Source: Talking Points Memo
Kentucky State Rep. Leslie Combs (D) accidentally fired her semi-automatic handgun in the state capitol building Tuesday night just before Gov. Steve Beshear (D) gave his state of the state address, WHAS11 reported.
Combs was unloading her gun in the Capitol annex office when it went off. The bullet hit the floor and ricocheted toward a bookshelf, according to WHAS11.
Rep. Jeff Greer (D) was in the room at the time, but Combs said she was following safety procedure and that nobody was in harm's way, WHAS11 reported. Nobody was injured.
"I thought it was totally clear," Combs told WHAS11 Wednesday. "I am a gun owner. It happens."
-snip-
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/kentucky-representative-accidentally-fired-gun-state-capitol
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,661 posts)to be a dumbass about guns.
crim son
(27,464 posts)are just as tiresome as their R counterparts.
MH1
(17,595 posts)Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)...as long as you're, you know, cautious.
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)If you think it will never happen to you, then you're probably not as safe as you think.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)It helps to read the whole statement.
Kind of like, "I never rear-end other vehicles on the road as long as I am cautious."
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Guns and cars don't work as planned 100% of the time. Nobody is cautious 100% of the time either. The idea that it will never happen to you actually helps to increase the odds it will because it reinforces the false belief in your own infallibility. The reason why smart people clear weapons in a safe direction is because it happens. I've seen it happen, even when I thought someone was being safe.
MrModerate
(9,753 posts)Since caution although absolutely essential is not a magical way to avoid all accidents. Road conditions (this is a major factor), the condition of your vehicle, the behavior of other vehicles in your vicinity, momentary inattention that all human beings (including the cautious) are subject to, distance estimation errors, etc., etc., etc. can get you in an accident in a literal split second.
The same is true of firearms. One main difference between autos and guns, of course, is that autos are designed to transport and guns are designed to kill, so when there is an accident, the range of outcomes for guns is much narrower.
You might even say, ironically, 'targeted.'
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)There. I reminded you.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)without having an accident.
You are not omnipotent. You can (I hope you never do) have an accident while handling or carrying a gun. Anyone can. You can drop a gun...you can trip while carrying a gun...you can forget something while cleaning a gun...even though you think you can't. You are only human. Caution reduces the possibility of accidents, but it does not protect you from ever having an accident.
Lots of people have accidents with guns...which is why they should not be allowed in certain places, like hospitals and schools. Many of them probably thought they were "cautious" too.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)I just choose not to.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)Then the "in fromt of me" was intentional. Got it.
Jerry442
(1,265 posts)It's best if you never let yourself forget that you are just one random f***-up away from an accident.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)accidental and negligent discharge of firearms.
When the records for 2008 come out, I will be
one of those people in the report.
Each year people are also killed by accidental and negligent discharge of firearms.
At about 5:16 PM on January 19, 2008 I had a negligent discharge
of my Rock Island .45 ACP pistol.
It was NOT an accidental discharge.
It was caused by negligence.
I knew all of the safety rules.
I thought that I followed all of the safety rules.
But I became complacent.
I let my guard down just one time.
That was all it took.
Arkansas Granny
(31,513 posts)Anyone knows that the quickest way to unload a gun is through the barrel.
cvoogt
(949 posts)It doesn't happen, unless you decide to own a gun and subsequently decide to be irresponsible. But sure, stuff happens, whatever. It's only a deadly weapon after all.
CTyankee
(63,901 posts)And what have we who are in favor of sensible gun laws been saying all along?
PUBLIC SAFETY! And that, dear friends, is a huge issue with respect to guns...and now a gun owner herself has admitted it.
Well, well...
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)It says a lot about HER. She's a careless fool.
CTyankee
(63,901 posts)sorry, I know this is something you don't want to hear...
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)I'm sure she confirms all sorts of your pre-existing (and misguided) biases.
CTyankee
(63,901 posts)boring...
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)What do you think of gun owners?
CTyankee
(63,901 posts)Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)Can you point out the word "some" in your earlier sentence?
CTyankee
(63,901 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I wouldn't be in the same room with her. If I was, and she was armed, I'd leave. I'd encourage everyone else to leave too.
That was a level of negligence that cannot be excused. I threw a guy out of my house once, for handling a pistol that I *knew* for 100% certain was completely unloaded, in a negligent manner, and pointing it in directions that swept across people's body parts (Legs through/below the table).
Threw his ass out.
So hopefully that tells you something about gun owners too.
CTyankee
(63,901 posts)idea of gun owners that can't be characterized as attractive or helpful...that's what I am saying...
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)You know, people who have no business being behind the wheel of a 2,000 pound machine? They're just careless, inattentive, reckless, stupid...?
Of course you have. They're all over the place.
Do the existence of those idiot drivers "reinforce the idea" that ALL car drivers are awful?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)We can be coddling and nice and allow entirely preventable bad shit to happen, or, we can follow the rules, and prevent horrible, tragic, entirely preventable accidents from happening.
I can't be both.
Yes, throwing someone out of my house seems extreme, but he protested that what he was doing was harmless, even though the other people at the table were visibly uncomfortable about it, and even though as the host, I asked him politely to stop it multiple times. (He was not a gun owner.)
Safety first. If you can't put safety first over politeness or gentle understanding, you probably have no business possessing a weapon that can punch holes in people with a twitch of the finger.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)It seems this person believes that ALL gun owners are reckless idiots. Because, you know, we only read news stories about reckless, idiotic gun owners, so that must mean that ALL of us gun owners are incompetent.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)He was handling someone else's firearm. (A birthday present for my wife.)
I guess I didn't make that clear though.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)But that's what I'm guessing that poster means.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Hopefully there is clarity in intent in the poster's next response. I can see how you interpreted it that way.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"idiotic gun owners..."
Probably just the idiotic ones who pretend they can choose not have an accident.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)That's because the vast majority of us are extremely cautious and are hyper-sensitive of safety rules, and we have a healthy paranoia of how dangerous the weapon can be if handled incorrectly.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)you knew she was irresponsible. Someone in the room could have been killed. In that case someone would have died before you knew she was irresponsible.
My feeling is that there are hundreds of thousands of people like her walking around in public with loaded guns.
The people's right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness is trumped by gun laws.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I agree that there are a lot of negligent gun owners. Too many. No qualms there. I think the license to carry in public should have competence/qualifications, and not all states do. (Some do training requirements)
But your last bit there could be applied to automobiles easily enough. Simple word substitution and it is perfectly valid. So there is some fundamental problem with it. Could apply to a lot of elective activities that incur risk to non-participants.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)carrying loaded guns around. In my 67 year I never worried about being accidentally shot like I am now.
The more guns around the more the risk of someone being shot.
Because cars can be dangerous is no reason to allow more dangerous items to the mix.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)More people are carrying than ever before. But the accidental gunshot rate is half what it was in the 50's, when most states didn't even ALLOW concealed carry.
In the 28 years Washington State has had it, our accidental injury rate with firearms is down about 30%.
More people carrying isn't the correlation you were looking for. (Which might be a surprise, even to me, because WA has no training requirement, which I think is not a great idea.)
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Well, maybe not logic, but certainly assumptions. I would tend to assume more guns carried by more people, who have unknown levels of training, would increase the injury rate, but that hasn't happened. Precisely why could use more study.
There are between 9 and 10 million people now, with permits to carry concealed. There would have been less than 1 million in 1950.
The only thing that I can see that might suggest why, is that the accidental firearm injury/death rate is not broken out by cause. So, hunting accidents, children finding dad's gun under the bed, cleaning/goofing around, all of those injuries roll up to a single number. We can't compare JUST the accidental injury rate for people who carried, concealed or open, in 1950 versus today, because that data was not captured in a way we can slice it up.
It is POSSIBLE but unproven, that the injury/death rate associated with people who carry is up, but the total for all injury/death is WAY down from the 1950's.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)gone down that could be true since more people carry but that is not the same as saying the number shootings has gone down.
The general public is not more safe if the percapita number has gone down.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)The total used to be in excess of 1,000 per year. Total. 1950's population. Now it's around 500/year. Total.
(A small fraction of the total ~30k/year murder/accident/suicide total combined)
hack89
(39,171 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I'm not a gun grabber or anti gun. I am anti gun violence and anti accidental shootings.
hack89
(39,171 posts)if in fact the accidental gun accident is half of what is was in the 50's then what basis do you have to reject it like you did ("defies logic" if you do not have any facts to counter that statement?
My only point.
On edit: one very good reason why gun accidents have been slashed drastically is that modern guns have many more safety features built in. Now days one should be very skeptical on any account of an incident where someone says "the gun just went off" or "it went off when I dropped it". With modern guns, you have to willfully pull the trigger to make it shoot - which means it is not an accident but rather pure negligence.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)can and are spun.
hack89
(39,171 posts)so what was your basis for questioning those facts? Not saying they were right or wrong - just talking about your reaction to them.
1000words
(7,051 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)"I thought it was totally clear"........ Doesn't take much to make sure.
Vashta Nerada
(3,922 posts)tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)safety procedures.
herding cats
(19,558 posts)It's a relief to know she won't be armed anymore.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)herding cats
(19,558 posts)I guess she's over her shock and got her message straight again. Armed and ignorant are never a good combination.
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)She's a proud supporter of FACES, the Federation of American Coal, Energy, and Security. FACES is allied with Friends of Coal, Coal Mining Our Future, and the Coalition for Mountaintop Mining. (What could possibly be more patriotic than mountaintop mining?)
And now we know she's an irresponsible pistol-packer as well.
What's not to like?
Iggo
(47,547 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)It's called a negligent discharge for a reason.
NickB79
(19,233 posts)nolabear
(41,959 posts)That's madness. Just plain madness.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)"It happens," is no excuse. She should have been arrested for discharging a firearm in a public place, and she should be prosecuted.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Holy shit, I read that article and just assumed she was a Republican anyway.
Wow, I gotta check those assumptions at the door.
I totally agree with you, by the way.
Common Sense Party
(14,139 posts)Nope. There are idiots everywhere.
enough
(13,256 posts)rdharma
(6,057 posts)What an irresponsible gun-hugging embarrassment to the party!
She dismissed it with, "It happens"? WTF?!!!!
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I'm as aghast as you are.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)I mean I don't know about KY but there's guards everywhere in ours.
Where I work you have to be checked to get in and there is guards. I never felt the need with so much security.
CherokeeDem
(3,709 posts)There is security and besides... who takes a gun into a public building but someone who is nuts to begin with... as a poster said earlier... party does not preclude ignorance.
BTW... the Kentucky Capitol is a beautiful building....
http://capitol.ky.gov/Pages/default.aspx
blackspade
(10,056 posts)There is no need for non security folks to have weapons in public anyway.
frylock
(34,825 posts)"I thought it was totally clear." fucking idiot.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Never had an accidental discharge.
A lot of gun owners barely know which end the fucking bullet comes out.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)-snip-
As the Lexington Herald-Leader reports, Combs has a concealed carry license, which she says she obtained several years ago "as I travel widely and sometimes at night."
Combs said she will continue to carry her handgun.
"I strongly support our Second Amendment rights and our state's concealed-carry law, and believe just as strongly that gun safety and education must be part of that equation," she said.
-snip-
Full article here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/08/leslie-combs-gun_n_4563584.html
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)...
Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)Mine accidents just happen too. Some Kentucky Pol said that too.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)20 kids in a school and a bunch of people in movie theater.....meh.....right?
Fucking self-centered dipshits.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Rochester, NH had another case of gun owner incompetency today as well.
riqster
(13,986 posts)Best advice I ever got: "there is no such thing as an unloaded gun".
Technically not true, of course. But as a safety mantra, it is hard to beat.
Incitatus
(5,317 posts)playing paintball
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)"It happens." Move along, nothing to see here.
olddad56
(5,732 posts)just for having gotten the gun inside the building, let alone discharging it.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)Some failure, or series of failures, occurs. Aren't gun nuts always saying that "Guns don't kill people, people do?" By that logic, somebody's responsible when a gun discharges. always. You can't have it both ways.
QuestForSense
(653 posts)If the bullet ricocheted, it was out of her control. The story would have been entirely different if she were a teacher, or employed at McDonald's, and this had occurred.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)This is why you don't go tootling around at work or in public with fucking guns.
Because accidents do happen. They were lucky this time.
Brigid
(17,621 posts)What then?
TeamPooka
(24,218 posts)bowens43
(16,064 posts)fujiyama
(15,185 posts)Many people don't take gun safety seriously. I think a lot of gun owners do, but all too many obviously don't. That's why we have so many "accidents" where kids get a hold of their parents guns or it "accidentally" goes off.
I like the idea of requiring firearm insurance and in cases like this where "accidents" take place, the owner should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. If someone wishes to own a gun, they should be required to show they can handle it responsibly. I don't know why that's a big deal.
Hell, that sounds like something the NRA might have backed decades ago, before they became a complete shill for the firearms lobby and RW talk radio and conspiracy theorists convinced millions that the government wanted to confiscate their weapons.
DFW
(54,335 posts)If it happens, you should NOT be a gun owner.
truthisfreedom
(23,142 posts)What are gun designers thinking?
rock
(13,218 posts)Dash87
(3,220 posts)Another careless idiot with a gun...