Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Redfairen

(1,276 posts)
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 08:10 PM Jan 2014

'Almost unreal' : Bipartisan lawmakers unveil new Voting Rights Act fix

Source: NBC News

A bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced legislation Thursday that would restore protections in the Voting Rights Act that were struck down by the Supreme Court last year.

"It is unbelievable, it is almost unreal that we were able to come together so quickly to craft a compromise that both Democrats and Republicans can find a way to support and move forward," said Rep. John Lewis, a Georgia Democrat and leader of the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s. 

The legislation would rewrite the formula that decides which localities and states must get federal approval before changing their voting laws – the piece of the law that the court struck down as unconstitutional, leaving it essentially toothless.

.......

The proposed legislation would state that all states and jurisdictions are subject to the same standard: If they have a clean record with no voting violations over the past 15 years, they don't have to ask the federal government for approval to change their laws. But if they have a certain number of voting violations over the last 15 years, they have to get a thumbs up from the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division or the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia first.

Read more: http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/16/22328058-almost-unreal-bipartisan-lawmakers-unveil-new-voting-rights-act-fix?lite

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Almost unreal' : Bipartisan lawmakers unveil new Voting Rights Act fix (Original Post) Redfairen Jan 2014 OP
WOW! Great news! n/t Tx4obama Jan 2014 #1
I feel certain this will pass muster even under the current court. Great news! n/t freshwest Jan 2014 #2
This Is An Election Year And The Stakes Are High..... global1 Jan 2014 #3
Been thinking the same thing Capt13 Jan 2014 #9
sounds good, now ... surrealAmerican Jan 2014 #4
With the Tea Party in power, fat chance. Archae Jan 2014 #6
We need a whip count. CBHagman Jan 2014 #15
If John Lewis says it's OK, then that's good muriel_volestrangler Jan 2014 #5
Yup, Lewis Seal of Approval is Good Enough For Me Any Day of the Week Skraxx Jan 2014 #12
+1 Dawson Leery Jan 2014 #13
Agree TroglodyteScholar Jan 2014 #16
which states/citites pass the 15 year test? alc Jan 2014 #7
I heard today on MSNBC only 4 states needed to get preapproval Samantha Jan 2014 #11
Maybe they can get enough votes to bypass Republicans Leadership K lib Jan 2014 #8
Freeperville already calling Sensenbrenner a RINO over this. alp227 Jan 2014 #10
Good news! Quantess Jan 2014 #14

global1

(25,224 posts)
3. This Is An Election Year And The Stakes Are High.....
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 08:35 PM
Jan 2014

I think the Repugs are doing some of these things so that they can say that they did and win points with voters.

I also heard that Boehner and the Repugs are going to introduce their version of a healthcare law - this will happen before the election as well.

They just agreed on this budget and the approval.

Something is up - I don't trust them.

CBHagman

(16,981 posts)
15. We need a whip count.
Sat Jan 18, 2014, 05:29 PM
Jan 2014

Conceivably there could be enough Democratic and Republican votes to pass this. The question is whether it comes up for a vote at all and then what happens in the Senate.

alc

(1,151 posts)
7. which states/citites pass the 15 year test?
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 09:43 PM
Jan 2014

I didn't see how many is a "certain number of voting violation" in the article. 1? 100? 1000000000? Does Congress set that every year? The Attorney General? What if we get an R for AG in 2016?

This could mean "all changes, anywhere in the country need approval". Or "no changes anywhere will need approval unless future violations are found". Or anywhere in between.

Samantha

(9,314 posts)
11. I heard today on MSNBC only 4 states needed to get preapproval
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 02:02 AM
Jan 2014

I couldn't believe there were so few. North Carolina was not one of the 4. That was hard to believe as well. I do remember one was Texas and one was Georgia. Cannot remember the other 2 and didn't see this mentioned in the article.

Sam

K lib

(153 posts)
8. Maybe they can get enough votes to bypass Republicans Leadership
Thu Jan 16, 2014, 09:45 PM
Jan 2014

although i do not see that is very likely

alp227

(32,006 posts)
10. Freeperville already calling Sensenbrenner a RINO over this.
Fri Jan 17, 2014, 01:13 AM
Jan 2014

One comment: "GOP needs to be looking at ways to disenfranchise the parasite class, not stack the deck against white people." IOW a more polite version of "anti-racist is a code word for anti-white". That should tell ya what goes in that sewer pit of a message board.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Almost unreal' : Biparti...