Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 06:54 PM Jan 2014

W. Va. Company Ordered to Remove (All Above-Ground) Tanks After Spill

Source: Associated Press

W.VA. COMPANY ORDERED TO REMOVE TANKS AFTER SPILL

By JOHN RABY
— Jan. 25, 2014 5:04 PM EST

CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) — West Virginia's governor on Saturday ordered the company at the center of a chemical spill that tainted the state capital's water supply to remove all above-ground storage tanks from the Charleston operation.

A statement released by Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin's office said Freedom Industries must start the dismantling process by March 15.

The Jan. 9 spill of a chemical used to clean coal at Freedom Industries contaminated the water supply for 300,000 West Virginians, some of whom couldn't use their tap water for a week.

The order to dismantle and properly dispose of the tanks also includes associated piping and machinery. The facility currently has 17 tanks. The governor's statement said crude MCHM leaked from one of three now-empty tanks containing the chemical at the plant.

All 17 tanks "are located within inadequate secondary containment areas," the statement said.

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/wva-company-ordered-remove-tanks-after-spill

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
W. Va. Company Ordered to Remove (All Above-Ground) Tanks After Spill (Original Post) Hissyspit Jan 2014 OP
the corp secondary site had problems too. Herself Jan 2014 #1
Travel up the Kanawha from Charleston to the Ohio River theHandpuppet Jan 2014 #14
Good. I hope they don't muck everything up with appeals. CaliforniaPeggy Jan 2014 #2
Isn't the company going through bankruptcy? modrepub Jan 2014 #3
Yeah, bury them... Wounded Bear Jan 2014 #4
I was going to say that, hollysmom Jan 2014 #6
Make them put in monitors csziggy Jan 2014 #9
That's a liberal solution... Wounded Bear Jan 2014 #13
to cheap to replace riveted tanks with welded ones madrchsod Jan 2014 #5
This is a bit like locking the gate after all the cows have headed down the road ladym55 Jan 2014 #7
And we never will. theHandpuppet Jan 2014 #15
Company will sue Kelvin Mace Jan 2014 #8
They've already declared bankruptcy. csziggy Jan 2014 #10
Should have made him take out a student loan. Then it would follow him to the grave. n/t jtuck004 Jan 2014 #12
Oh YES! That will FIX the problem. bvar22 Jan 2014 #11
Good post, bvar22! calimary Jan 2014 #16
First, they were unregulated... ReRe Jan 2014 #17

Herself

(185 posts)
1. the corp secondary site had problems too.
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 06:56 PM
Jan 2014

How many other tank storage sites are there in W. VA?
What is the Governor doing about them?

The rest of the states need to do the same thing, but will wait until the same thing happens.

theHandpuppet

(19,964 posts)
14. Travel up the Kanawha from Charleston to the Ohio River
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 08:40 PM
Jan 2014

Banks on both sides thick with storage tanks.

modrepub

(3,491 posts)
3. Isn't the company going through bankruptcy?
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 06:59 PM
Jan 2014

If so I would think that tank removal would be the lastthing on the company's to-do list. Anyone want to bet the taxpayers are going to pay for this enterprise?

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)
6. I was going to say that,
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 07:10 PM
Jan 2014

shouldn't they have them above ground and have moats around them so they can see if there are leaks?

csziggy

(34,131 posts)
9. Make them put in monitors
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 07:41 PM
Jan 2014

For several years there was a station in the parking lot where my husband works. Some gasoline station tanks had leaked and the state EPA was monitoring to make sure the leakage was not going to travel to local water sources. Every so often when I visited my husband at work, a state truck would be there checking the readings.

The companies should be required to pay for monitoring like that on over or underground tanks as a routine precaution. In addition, all tanks should have to be replaced periodically, just like gasoline storage tanks are now required to be replaced. If gas stations can do it every so many years, chemical companies can, too!

Wounded Bear

(58,605 posts)
13. That's a liberal solution...
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 08:31 PM
Jan 2014

evil government regulations costing poor corporations money.

Do I need:

ladym55

(2,577 posts)
7. This is a bit like locking the gate after all the cows have headed down the road
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 07:27 PM
Jan 2014

We still don't know the extent of the damage of that spill.

csziggy

(34,131 posts)
10. They've already declared bankruptcy.
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 07:43 PM
Jan 2014

It was in another thread here on DU. Their assets are supposed to be transferred to a new corporation just formed that has the same guy as the CEO. Of course, if the judge allows this, that means that the assets may not be accessible for damage suit judgements.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
11. Oh YES! That will FIX the problem.
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 07:48 PM
Jan 2014

The PROBLEM is that everybody could SEE the above ground tanks leaking,
and knew exactly who to blame.
Burying those tanks will solve THAT problem.


Reminds me of how Rumsfeld solved the problem of torture at Abu Ghraib.
He took away everybody's cameras.
NOW, no more photos of torture!
Problem Solved.

Life in These United States




You will know them by their WORKS.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
17. First, they were unregulated...
Sat Jan 25, 2014, 11:46 PM
Jan 2014

... then they receive a get-out-of-jail-card free with the bankruptcy. And now the state agency that's supposed to be investigating the accident is agreeing to dismantling the tanks. This takes the place of a fire. They've come up with a way, within the state government, to destroy the evidence. And the state Environmental Agency is in on it. That's my take.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»W. Va. Company Ordered to...