W. Va. Company Ordered to Remove (All Above-Ground) Tanks After Spill
Source: Associated Press
W.VA. COMPANY ORDERED TO REMOVE TANKS AFTER SPILL
By JOHN RABY
Jan. 25, 2014 5:04 PM EST
CHARLESTON, W.Va. (AP) West Virginia's governor on Saturday ordered the company at the center of a chemical spill that tainted the state capital's water supply to remove all above-ground storage tanks from the Charleston operation.
A statement released by Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin's office said Freedom Industries must start the dismantling process by March 15.
The Jan. 9 spill of a chemical used to clean coal at Freedom Industries contaminated the water supply for 300,000 West Virginians, some of whom couldn't use their tap water for a week.
The order to dismantle and properly dispose of the tanks also includes associated piping and machinery. The facility currently has 17 tanks. The governor's statement said crude MCHM leaked from one of three now-empty tanks containing the chemical at the plant.
All 17 tanks "are located within inadequate secondary containment areas," the statement said.
Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/wva-company-ordered-remove-tanks-after-spill
Herself
(185 posts)How many other tank storage sites are there in W. VA?
What is the Governor doing about them?
The rest of the states need to do the same thing, but will wait until the same thing happens.
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)Banks on both sides thick with storage tanks.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,534 posts)modrepub
(3,491 posts)If so I would think that tank removal would be the lastthing on the company's to-do list. Anyone want to bet the taxpayers are going to pay for this enterprise?
Wounded Bear
(58,605 posts)That way it's harder to trace the leaks.
hollysmom
(5,946 posts)shouldn't they have them above ground and have moats around them so they can see if there are leaks?
csziggy
(34,131 posts)For several years there was a station in the parking lot where my husband works. Some gasoline station tanks had leaked and the state EPA was monitoring to make sure the leakage was not going to travel to local water sources. Every so often when I visited my husband at work, a state truck would be there checking the readings.
The companies should be required to pay for monitoring like that on over or underground tanks as a routine precaution. In addition, all tanks should have to be replaced periodically, just like gasoline storage tanks are now required to be replaced. If gas stations can do it every so many years, chemical companies can, too!
Wounded Bear
(58,605 posts)evil government regulations costing poor corporations money.
Do I need:
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)gotta love unregulated capitalism!
ladym55
(2,577 posts)We still don't know the extent of the damage of that spill.
theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)Bet on it.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)nothing will happen.
csziggy
(34,131 posts)It was in another thread here on DU. Their assets are supposed to be transferred to a new corporation just formed that has the same guy as the CEO. Of course, if the judge allows this, that means that the assets may not be accessible for damage suit judgements.
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)The PROBLEM is that everybody could SEE the above ground tanks leaking,
and knew exactly who to blame.
Burying those tanks will solve THAT problem.
Reminds me of how Rumsfeld solved the problem of torture at Abu Ghraib.
He took away everybody's cameras.
NOW, no more photos of torture!
Problem Solved.
Life in These United States
You will know them by their WORKS.
calimary
(81,135 posts)Wish I could recommend it on its own!
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... then they receive a get-out-of-jail-card free with the bankruptcy. And now the state agency that's supposed to be investigating the accident is agreeing to dismantling the tanks. This takes the place of a fire. They've come up with a way, within the state government, to destroy the evidence. And the state Environmental Agency is in on it. That's my take.