Peter King slams RNC on NSA resolution
Source: Politico
Rep. Peter King on Saturday blasted a new resolution from the Republican National Committee concerning the National Security Agency, charging that the hysterical measure could be a death warrant for the GOP.
The RNC on Friday called the NSA surveillance program unconstitutional in a resolution, urging a halt of the efforts and a full public accounting of the data collection initiatives. In an interview with POLITICO, King, a hawkish New York Republican, said the move pushed the party in an isolationist direction.
Were going to make the Democrats and Barack Obama the party of national security, he said. Its signing our own death warrant as a party....
Republicans are supposed to be the party of national defense, King said. It would be one thing if people wanted to pass legislation [posing] questions. But to talk about spying and unconstitutionality
its basically repudiating the policies of the Republican Party over the last 12 years, policies that kept us safe.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/peter-king-rnc-nsa-resolution-102611.html?hp=l1
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)...how they continue to defy the laws of political survival?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)shouldn't I look long and hard at how it operates?
cstanleytech
(26,283 posts)I say let the republicans proceed with this suicide mission of theirs if it makes it easier for the democrats to regain the house.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)And two, the Director of the NSA is a cabinet-level position and Obama could order Keith Alexander to take action today that would curtail the abuse. That is, if he had the political courage to do so.
cstanleytech
(26,283 posts)to change the laws and that means its up to the republicans themselves ultimately to fix this mess that they made.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Period. Just like he told the military to end "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" - he didn't need Congress to do that.
bucolic_frolic
(43,131 posts)and he's right, legislation should reign in the practices to ensure
privacy with security to the greatest extent possible
but no politician seems to want to go there, so, therefore, the
info collected is being used for some other purpose?
bemildred
(90,061 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)If this resolution helps speed that process, all the better.
cstanleytech
(26,283 posts)If they hadnt done that for the past few decades they might not have devolved into the nutjob party.
Titonwan
(785 posts)want this secrecy and over reaching invasion of our privacy through meta data collection/storage. It wouldn't surprise me that Hillary would want the status quo, too.
This will become a big problem if the Democrats don't get ahead of this and fully embrace a reduction of these secret powers, even if it conflicts with this president's 'kick the can down the road' attitude.
The leaks will continue to come out and more people will change their minds and become increasingly skeptical of these out of control surveillance powers.
I won't vote for Hillary come hell or high water but she'd be wise to heed the stirring of the masses. It's only gonna get worse before 2016. I'd be nipping this in the bud.
underpants
(182,773 posts)WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)Tippy
(4,610 posts)struggle4progress
(118,280 posts)Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Since when has being a snoop made anyone popular with anyone?
Question for DUers. Does anyone find stalking attractive?
How NSA Spies Abused Their Powers to Snoop on Girlfriends, Lovers, and First Dates
http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/09/27/loveint_how_nsa_spies_snooped_on_girlfriends_lovers_and_first_dates.html