Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 07:31 AM Jan 2014

Afghanistan to free 37 prisoners soon despite US protests

Last edited Mon Jan 27, 2014, 08:16 AM - Edit history (1)

Source: Google news / AFP

Kabul: Afghanistan said today it expects to release within two weeks a first batch of alleged Taliban prisoners whom the US says are responsible for dozens of NATO and Afghan deaths.

Kabul announced on January 9 that a total of 72 detainees held at Bagram jail near Kabul would be freed due to lack of evidence, and an official said today that 37 were to be released initially.

The US military force in Afghanistan condemned the news of the releases, saying the prisoners were "dangerous insurgents" who had "Afghan blood on their hands".

The issue threatens further to strain US-Afghan relations, amid pressure for the two countries to sign a long-delayed security deal allowing some American soldiers to stay in the country after 2014. Abdul Shukur Dadras from the government body reviewing detainees at Bagram, which was previously run by US forces, said 37 prisoners would be released soon.


Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jK2JUeiD37FTiv5Yku561zKn1tXg?docId=c4547c28-36f2-4daf-bd79-1f7107646ecc

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Afghanistan to free 37 prisoners soon despite US protests (Original Post) dipsydoodle Jan 2014 OP
"freed due to lack of evidence". Gee - what a concept! ConcernedCanuk Jan 2014 #1
Obama needs to get those troops out of that country TOMORROW!!! bigdarryl Jan 2014 #2
''dangerous insurgents'' who had ''Afghan blood on their hands'' DeSwiss Jan 2014 #3
Yes - the statement conveniently overlooks dipsydoodle Jan 2014 #6
Not getting our way, are we? nt bemildred Jan 2014 #4
get our troops out of that abattoir nt geek tragedy Jan 2014 #5
 

ConcernedCanuk

(13,509 posts)
1. "freed due to lack of evidence". Gee - what a concept!
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 09:50 AM
Jan 2014

.
.
.

How unAmerican of them Afghans . . .

OH

and them fussy Afghans want USA's military and contractors to be held accountable for it's own crimes as well.

Strange people them Afghans . . .

CC

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
3. ''dangerous insurgents'' who had ''Afghan blood on their hands''
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 11:02 AM
Jan 2014
- Which is a description that might be applied to all parties concerned. So why should you go free???

At least it's their country......

K&R

Other definitions of insanity:
[center]











[/center]

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
6. Yes - the statement conveniently overlooks
Mon Jan 27, 2014, 12:02 PM
Jan 2014

that they are Afghans. The US is also stuck with the fact that Karzai has made it perfectly clear that any agreement will be subject to "hands off" as far as the Taliban are concerned - the US will be restricted solely to the pursuit of any remaining members of al-qaeda suspected to be 100 max......................just a bit more than when the US invaded.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Afghanistan to free 37 pr...