Sen. Dianne Feinstein against legalizing marijuana
Source: Associated Press
Sen. Dianne Feinstein on Wednesday joined Gov. Jerry Brown in expressing skepticism about legalizing marijuana in California for recreational purposes.
The state's senior senator told The Associated Press in a telephone interview that one of her concerns is the potential for pot-impaired drivers to take to the road. Feinstein said she hopes California declines to join Colorado and Washington in approving the sale of marijuana for recreational use.
"The risk of people using marijuana and driving is very substantial," she said.
... Feinstein said in the interview that she believes California has gone as far as is responsible in allowing marijuana to be sold for medical purposes.
Read more: http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/state&id=9472871
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Remember Sippy Cup from the afternoon show on MSNBC. She said that they are watching Colorado, because if the prices remain high people may put black market sources into place...
"May put"? Did she just fall off the turnip truck? Just like Feinstein suggesting that there aren't people driving impaired all around now, most of them on alchohol though, as a reason to keep up the failed war on people just buggers belief - she really thinks all the people that are smoking now aren't smoking? And that they will start when this happens? Seriously?
Demonstrating complete ignorance of reality, which I suspect is deliberate rather than just a lack of knowledge.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Why is she still even around. She's just holding that job to enrich her family and protect the NSA. Morally bankrupt and ethically challenged, she has joined the vermin who trounce on Americas values. I see her the same way I see Bush and Cheney. Gavin Newsome should primary her.
Cha
(296,848 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)It's why she keeps getting elected because we sure as hell won't elect a Republican senator -- not that she's a whole lot better. If the CDP would just stay out of it and let Democracy take it's course, but they won't. She's too, shall we say, malleable.
warrant46
(2,205 posts)I often wonder how such a Dinosaur keeps walking and chewing Gum in the forest
Now I know
MindMover
(5,016 posts)tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)I hope alcohol is being banned sometime soon?
Cha
(296,848 posts)any authority. And, Gov Brown?
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)At her age, she's got to be on a huge regimen of prescription drugs and any number of those can impair her judgment or abilities while behind the wheel of a car.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,164 posts)Greater focus on "driving while stoned".
In fact a lot of people already obviously do that. There is evidence in places that legalize or decriminalize marijuana, that use does not substantially increase. That those who are pot smokers remain at a certain percentage of the population. So basically the same amount of pot infused drivers are already on the road.
I may get flamed, but sorry I don't think driving after taking a few tokes is dangerous. Now of course if you just roasted yourself with some kind of mega-blaster pipe with multiple hits and then immediately got behind the wheel there may be consequences. But, especially for long time users, being mildly under the influence, does not make one a bad driver. Yes I speak from experience. I've been driving while stoned for decades now, never once have I been responsible for any serious accident. In fact I would argue that it makes you slightly more aware because of pots side effects of mild paranoia and the tendency to focus on one thing (driving).
So before States even talked about legalization, it was kind of don't ask don't tell. Cops concentrated on alcohol abuse, and so they should. Now, there is going to be a right wing push for road side weed testing. And we know how long weed stays in your blood system, even if the high is mostly gone after 20 minutes.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)She has to keep that prison money rolling!
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)I heard it from a DUer, recently.
former9thward
(31,936 posts)I'm sure you heard it from me. Simple possession is not not a prison offense in CA. Now I am sure you will come up with at least ONE name who is in prison for possession. Since you think this is occurring.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)So we're even. And I understand why this hag doesn't want legalized cannabis. Because she's a tool for the Capitalist pigs in the pharmaceutical industry as well as the arms industry.
- Well, you can straight to hell. People are not listening. And babies are being saved no matter how hard you try to kill them.
It's time for you to [font size=7]GO[/font].
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)Take Jerry with you.
shanti
(21,675 posts)Feinstein lost her appeal many years ago. She offends me now, with her views, it's time for her to retire!
JB put California on the right track financially, but if he runs again on an Anti Cannabis platform, he will lose.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)I was hoping he would choose not to run again but I guess the need for the spotlight is just too overwhelming.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)we have Abel Maldonado's spiffy new Louisiana-style "jungle primary" with everyone from every party on the June ballot, including repuke ex-con and registered sex offender Glenn Champ!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017182647
The top two finishers in June move on the November ballot. Wouldn't surprise me a bit if they were Brown and Champ.
OnionPatch
(6,169 posts)Only because the other choice was worse. Never again.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)cheapdate
(3,811 posts)My dear old mom, a fierce liberal and a lifelong social worker, is not a fan of marijuana. Maybe because as a case worker in child abuse and neglect, she's seen too much bullshit from people getting high.
Anyway, I'd love to see pot legalized. I wish I could get high every day.
geomon666
(7,512 posts)I don't live in California though so, not like I can do anything about it.
20score
(4,769 posts)I was wrong. It now goes to eleven.
ripcord
(5,268 posts)Because no one in California drives under the influence of pot now, I drive a truck and see people puffing all the time.
4now
(1,596 posts)Democratic Senators, Congressmen and Governors have been screwing over Cannibis supporters my whole life. They are worse then Republicans because you expect them to care about freedom but they don't.
Feinstiens excuse is pathetic. Did anyone ask her for proof of her statement about driving.... Of course not.
I hope I will find someone to vote for in 14 but its not looking good.
Throd
(7,208 posts)It is pretty much legal here as it is.
Too many of these Senators really don't understand what's going on in their own state.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,867 posts)Just like her and her husband profit from war. She is as corrupt as they get.
Supersedeas
(20,630 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)She's getting to be quite a nuisance.
rsmith6621
(6,942 posts)...NOT THE POLITICIANS.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)mwrguy
(3,245 posts)she's wrong on this one.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)xxqqqzme
(14,887 posts)Democratic Party is in love w/ her. She is actually older than Brown (difi - 81, JB - 76). We have some very good progressives in the legislature and elected government positions.I would love to see SoS Debra Bowen or Congressperson Jackie Speier take difi's place. I'd love to see John Chiang run for governor.
Cha
(296,848 posts)tofuandbeer
(1,314 posts)we sure do have a hell of a time getting new ideas put into lawin the past decade, other states seem to be ahead of us now.
It's time for the old-school likes of Brown and Feinstein to step aside and let those who know what's good for us take the lead.
cadaverdog
(228 posts)According to 4autoinsurance.com, the Top 10 reasons marijuana users are safer drivers are as follows:
1. Drivers who had been using marijuana were found to drive slower, according to a 1983 NHTSA study.
2. Marijuana users were able to drive straight and didn't have trouble staying in their own lanes, according to a 1993 NHTSA study done in the Netherlands. The same study concluded that marijuana had very little effect on overall driving ability.
3. Drivers who had smoked marijuana were less likely to try to pass other cars and were more likely to drive at a steady speed, according to a University of Adelaide study done in Australia. The study showed no danger from marijuana and driving unless the drivers had also been using alcohol.
I'd post more, but I'm baked. Check the link.
http://tinyurl.com/c9vbbhv
Cha
(296,848 posts)SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)I trust she realizes you can still be arrested for DUI even if the substance you are under the influence of is a perfectly legal substance...like alcohol.
reddread
(6,896 posts)to cartels.
love the BULLSHIT when they proclaim 215 is still in effect-
http://www.fresnobee.com/2014/03/18/3829647/fresno-city-council-takes-up-all.html
and they need to protect income streams like this-
http://www.fresnobee.com/2014/03/19/3831361/lawyer-fresno-officer-embarrassed.html
Lets be real about what their concerns are.
dont waste too much time reacting to what they say.
deal with what they do.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)If cannabis is legalized, the cartels can still make money.
. Heroin, cocaine, and meth
. Protection and extortion
. Robbing cannabis retailers
. Prostitution and human trafficking
. Selling untaxed bootleg herb
Don't forget gun running, murder for hire, and truck hijacking.
reddread
(6,896 posts)The ONLY way the "cartels" can continue their marijuana business is by keeping a lid on MJ legalization.
Once open cultivation is permitted, NOBODY is going to get rich on it.
I think the path of Heroin production is tied closely to US actions in Afghanistan.
I guess I rest my case.
Kind of assumed people would notice the local cop who was soliciting bribes from dealers.
Simply a drop in the bucket, an accidental prosecution by the Feds.
Happens ALL THE TIME.
kickysnana
(3,908 posts)Just my two cents here.
Garion_55
(1,915 posts)because that wouldnt be legal. keeping it illegal is the only thing stopping people from driving stoned this very second.
someone should ask that old bag 'when was the last time you drove stoned and how did it effect you?'
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Not! Fucking dinosaur. At some point we'll get it on the ballot (2016) and she won't have a damn thing to say about it.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)Step down or be thrown down.
maxsolomon
(33,244 posts)No one in WA or CA did either. Both states legalized through the initiative process.
The same will happen in CA.
If it fails, they can point at their opposition in the next election to defend themselves against law-and-order GOP attacks. If it passes, these "liberal" pols can say "I have no choice but to bow to the will of the people".
Leading from behind.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)U4ikLefty
(4,012 posts)that is all
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)as it's the cash cow for the cartels.
Not to mention criminalizing pot in this day and age is moronic on it's own "merits".
Not surprised Feinstein opposes legalization, consequently not disappointed. Brown is another story. I've held him in higher esteem.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)The reality is, legalizing pot will make a modest impact, but the cartels will survive. Like I mentioned in an earlier post, there are ways of making illegal money with legal cannabis.
And, if we make more weapons illegal while making pot legal, we will expand a major revenue source for them.
All in all, it is a good thing, but to believe that the cartels will dry up and blow away upon legalization is mere wishful thinking.
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)weed would make them "dry up and blow away", did I?
Most people understand what the word 'reduce' means.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)I am a supporter of legalization. Based on my own experience (as well as 45 years of being around tokers), the majority are good people, albeit a bit on the slow moving side.
Maybe I am reading it though, but some people seem to convey that they believe that this would be a singular end to organized crime
Cannabis is the safest recreational intoxicant there is. But sometimes there are not so nice things in black market bags. Pesticides, mold, fungus. Sometimes cannabis is grown in toxic soil, and uptakes cadmium and arsenic.
We need not only to legalize it, but to put safe weed systems in place. Just like food and medicine, people making money from growing should be accountable for selling a safe product.
Someone wants to spray their plants with pesticides and fungicides to the point of being cancerous? THEY should be the people in prison, not the granny on chemo!
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)".....but some people seem to convey that they believe that this would be a singular end to organized crime."
I've gotten this impression sometimes as well. From your previous post:
And, if we make more weapons illegal while making pot legal, we will expand a major revenue source for them.
This is what I find a lot of folks miss. Shouldn't the lessons of Prohibition and the "war on drugs" have taught us by now that demand creates it's own supply? Though in the case of firearms, the cartels would be competing with very competent underground domestic weapons producers.
Feral Child
(2,086 posts)Didn't she use to be a Democrat?
fredamae
(4,458 posts)You were Wrong about your beloved NSA---and you ignored us when we aired our concerns to you and your constituents directed you toward a different understanding/asking for protection.
Why should we find you credible on the matter of cannabis when well over 50% of Americans disagree and Science backs us up?
Your position regarding cannabis demonstrates you are like "flat-earthers" who are still in the dark and choose to remain there.
Your choice, certainly--but remember--voters have a choice too and personally--I do not/will not support Any politician who Chooses societal harm over science and common sense.
We are forced to support a failed and ineffective Drug Policy-a Multi Billion Dollar Publicly Funded Corporate Annual Investment to enforce laws the People do Not want enforced
Your position is Harmful to society-we are getting Zero return from this Corporate Interest you support and have supported for decades.
Your selective ignorance is too expensive for we the people.
The only benefactors in the WoD's are the corporations. So, thanks for letting us know who you are choosing to legislatively support over the will of the people--you are representative of the Wall Street/Corp Dems that must be replaced in order for our country to move forward.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)To my understanding her family personally profits from the Defense industry.
So she's opposing marijuana legalization because she's afraid there might be car accidents???
Seems like straining out the gnat and swallowing the camel.
Swede Atlanta
(3,596 posts)It wouldn't surprise me if Feinstein or her family don't have money interests in some part of the state correctional system. If you legalize marijuana, there go about 2/3 of the prisoners. That can't be good for business.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,139 posts)Or tearing around at two miles per hour! Or forgetting to get in their car!
TeamPooka
(24,207 posts)Splinter Cell
(703 posts)Why should marijuana be legal for recreational use? Because idiot pot heads want it to be?
JohnRogan
(51 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)Unless her concern isn't actually driver impairment?
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)last year, it was the gun issue (or was that the year before?)
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,494 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)The doctor said I could grow 6 mature plants.
I could transport up to 6 ounces.
Freedom at last!
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Lots of people making lots of $$$ on that war and I'm sure some politicians are on the take, too