SAF wins injunction v. N.M. “citizens only” CCW requirement
Source: Examiner.com
The Second Amendment Foundation notched another court victory today, this time in New Mexico, where a section of that states concealed carry law was hit with a permanent injunction for violating the Constitutions equal protection clause, while in neighboring Colorado, a federal court this morning began hearing a challenge to that states new gun control laws, passed in 2013.
The SAF case was Jackson v. Eden, and it challenged the New Mexico requirement that all applicants for carry licenses be U.S. citizens.
Chief U.S. District Judge M. Christina Armijo issued the order Monday morning in Albuquerque, noting that the state can sever the offending requirement and still enforce the remainder of the carry statute, which has other legal requirements that all applicants must satisfy.
John W. Jackson is an Australian citizen who resides permanently in Rio Rancho, a community just north of Albuquerque. With the exception of his citizenship status, he is otherwise qualified to obtain a concealed carry license, the court ruled.
Read more: http://www.examiner.com/article/saf-wins-injunction-v-n-m-citizens-only-ccw-requirement
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)the gun lobby is now advocating for the rights of undocumented immigrants?!
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)kmlisle
(276 posts)It would be interesting to see what would have happened in court if the plaintant had been Latino. Of course New Mexico is Not Arizona on this issue.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)kmlisle
(276 posts)He chooses not to be an American citizen and has lived here since he was 17. He is documented because of the green card not undocumented. We have millions of legal documented people from other countries living in the us. Thousands live in my home town because it is a big university with thousands of documented students with mostly temporary green cards. No sarcasm needed.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)I see the UU Flaming Chalice below your name. Surely you don't want everyone walking around armed?
kmlisle
(276 posts)I'm not sure how Florida officials would react. But I do have vet and hunter friends who are armed and have no problem with their choices. As a UU I try to stay open and respectful to other people's points of view.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Welcome to DU! (Or is that DUU? )
kmlisle
(276 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)There is Circuit appeals level precedent already in place. Trivial matter to decide.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)In Washington State, after 9/11 they suspended, indefinitely, the alien firearms license program. 2AF sued and got it going again.
And this isn't strictly about undocumented immigrants, it applies to legal, resident aliens as well.
Essentially, the constitution applies equally to all persons within its sphere of influence.
Callmecrazy
(3,065 posts)enjoys the rights granted to us by our Constitution. Regardless of where you are from, you are here now and subject to our laws.
And where does it say he's undocumented?
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)I don't think so.
Callmecrazy
(3,065 posts)And he has stated that he is an Australian citizen. I'm sure he can vote absentee in Australia.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Never enough guns...MORE guns....GUNS!
Sick bastards.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)on edit: it would be "sick" if they carved out a special exemption in the equal protection clause to allow such a law to stand...
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)...and as we've seen, some of them post here at DU.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)The 14th amendment requires "equal protection of the law". That goes for anybody, even undocumented immigrants. All share in the protections of the Bill of Rights.
jpak
(41,756 posts)yup