Could Rio games come to London? Olympic bosses make secret plea to use 2012 venues
Source: Evening Standard (RW?)
London has been secretly asked if it would be able to take over the 2016 Olympics because Brazil is so far behind on preparations, the Evening Standard has learned.
An informal approach was made by Olympics bosses to discover whether enough venues from the triumphant 2012 London Games could be brought back into use.
The disclosure follows growing panic at the International Olympic Committee over the shambles in Rio, where organisers are badly behind schedule.
IOC vice-president John Coates has called Brazils preparations the worst Ive experienced. He told a Sydney conference last month that construction had not begun on some venues, infrastructure was significantly delayed and water quality was a major concern with just two years to go.
Read more: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/could-rio-games-come-to-london-olympic-bosses-make-secret-plea-to-use-2012-venues-9344084.html
I originally got this from Geoff Shakelford, and in the comments someone says Sydny has also been asked.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,833 posts)This aggression will not stand!
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)an Olympics is coming up a newspaper from the area of the previous games comes up with this same story. Most recently in Vancouver when the Sochi olympics were falling way behind.
I think these stories are planted to try and put a boot in the ass of the people dragging their heels in the country next hosting.
It's a bullshit story...If the IOC decided to move the games, the Brazilian gov't would tie things up in court for 20 years...
There would also no incentive anymore for Brazil to NOT reveal just how much $$$$ changed hands with the IOC to even secure the Olympic bid...
DinahMoeHum
(21,783 posts). . .and the devil will have his due. . .
http://www.haymarketbooks.org/pb/Brazils-Dance-with-the-Devil
SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)I remember rumors that they were talking to Los Angeles about taking over the 2004 games, mostly to spur the Greeks into getting things going. I wouldn't be surprised if the IOC was looking for another kickback though, since they're so corrupt, they make Don King look clean.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)They could still move around the winter games but imo this whole thing of building expensive new facilities every four years is wasteful and turns the Olympics into a kind of nationalistic contest to see who can be the most extravagant.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)If we are going to have this foolishness, let's at least stop wasting so much money.
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Perhaps Switzerland, or one of the Nordic countries.
frylock
(34,825 posts)what an absolute clusterfuck.
mackerel
(4,412 posts)and now they're stuck with austerity measures. Pass it onto Sydney, they're set-up for it, they have the money,
and aren't over populated.
hauckeye
(634 posts)I think we should go to selecting a permanent site where the Olympics are held each time. Then money could be contributed towards keeping the venues up-to-date instead of building new ones every 4 years.
Xolodno
(6,390 posts)...on how much a country can spend on each needed venue...and only can build a new one if one doesn't exist or if upgrading an existing one is cost prohibitive. You know, the idea of spending within one's means.
It seems like every four years its about out doing the previous venue and spending more.
But it won't happen, IOC officials like to be wined, dined and courted better than the Tsar of Russia of old.
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)The tens of billions these facilities cost host countries is mind-boggling.
Take a look at the facilities in several host countries a decade later. They're in massive states of disrepair and/or completely abandoned.
Participating countries could collaborate through some system of upkeep on a permanent facility and the 'home' country would then have some sort of additional costs incurred to install their personal touches on the Olympic Village..
Just a thought.
sir pball
(4,741 posts)Don't necessarily lock it into one place, but reuse a handful of the already-built and known-successful venues (London, Sydney, Greece, so forth). It would be a hell of a lot cheaper and still provide some variety. Maybe draw straws instead of using a set schedule to liven things up more.
brentspeak
(18,290 posts)If it turns out to be a crime-infested and poorly run disaster, then the 2016 Olympics should be moved elsewhere.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)El Nino.
Yavin4
(35,433 posts)At the time, the RW was overjoyed, as they saw it as a rebuke of Obama who pushed for the games.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)World Cup.