Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,016 posts)
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 06:04 PM Jul 2014

Senator questions Hanford legal fees

Source: AP

SPOKANE, Wash. (AP) — Private contractors for the U.S. Department of Energy have spent at least $3.5 million in legal expenses to battle two critics of a massive construction project at the nation's most polluted nuclear site, according to a letter obtained Thursday by The Associated Press.

The letter is from the chairwoman of a U.S. Senate subcommittee that is investigating whether there was retaliation against two Hanford Nuclear Reservation workers who raised safety concerns and then lost their jobs at the former nuclear weapons production site.

"The Department of Energy may be providing an incentive to contractors to engage in protracted litigation with whistleblowers by reimbursing the contractors' legal expenses," said the letter from Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., to Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz.

The Energy Department said in a news release that such payments were lawful.

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/ap-newsbreak-senator-questions-hanford-legal-fees

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Tikki

(14,556 posts)
1. Good for Senator McCaskill....someone cares...
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 06:58 PM
Jul 2014

You can't even imagine how many billions the Hanford site and maintenance has cost the tax payers over the last 50+ years...


Tikki

bananas

(27,509 posts)
2. "incentive to contractors to engage in protracted litigation with whistleblowers"
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 09:54 PM
Jul 2014
McCaskill also questioned nondisclosure agreements the two contractors required employees to sign. The agreements prohibit employees from disclosing confidential information without the contractors' permission. McCaskill wondered if such agreements prevented other workers from coming forward with safety and environmental concerns.

"As you know, reporting those concerns, including to Congress, is protected by law," McCaskill wrote.


DOE pays contractors to legally harass and intimidate workers.

These NDA's are a big reason so many problems go unreported.

When a worker considers blowing the whistle, they know they will be fired and sued, they will have large legal fees and no income to pay it, let alone putting their kids through school.

Tikki

(14,556 posts)
3. It is a huge mess up there at Hanford and they keep that area going with a massive scheme...
Thu Jul 3, 2014, 10:25 PM
Jul 2014

of fighting back and forth on how they are going to handle the waste, the maintenance and the clean~up there.

But it really is a never-ending money pit, billions of tax payers' money spent, and there was never meant to be a solution or a conclusion to the waste problem.


Tikki

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senator questions Hanford...