Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine to fend off Putin-backed rebels
Source: The Washington Times
By Maggie Ybarra-The Washington Times Tuesday, July 22, 2014
A team of Pentagon officials is heading to Ukraine to help the country rebuild its fractured military, a mission that lawmakers and analysts expect will result in recommendations for greater military assistance in the countrys fight against pro-Russia separatists amid international outrage over the downing of a commercial airplane.
Within the next few weeks, a group of Defense Department representatives who specialize in strategy and policy will head to Kiev to evaluate specific programs that the United States may want to help bolster, said Army Col. Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman.
Their objective is to work with Ukrainians to shape and establish an enduring program for future U.S. efforts to support the Ukrainian military through subject-matter expert teams and long-term advisers, he said.
Rep. Duncan Hunter, California Republican, offered qualified support for the plan.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jul/22/pentagon-team-dispatched-to-ukraine-amid-crisis-wi/
I hope this is false news, since nobody seems to have picked it up except the Kyiv Post:
http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine-abroad/washington-times-obama-orders-pentagon-advisers-to-ukraine-to-fend-off-putin-backed-rebels-357573.html
yurbud
(39,405 posts)but there's something nefarious about it if anyone else does it.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Does anyone know what this means? I think this is English or some similar language, but I won't be held to that assessment. I mean the words are familiar and all. But the order in which they're put mean nothing since after you've finished reading them, it still has no meaning.
- I don't know who wrote this and released it, but I hope for their sake they did so anonymously.
reorg
(3,317 posts)candelista
(1,986 posts)But you're right. One can only guess at what this means. It's the kind of thing they say when they want to keep their options open.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)To make what they really intend to do appear noble.
Bottom line, we are going in there with money and bullets, and if that is not enough troupes or a nice Blackwater contract at least...and the downed airliner is the excuse...just as I thought it would be.
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)BootinUp
(47,063 posts)totodeinhere
(13,056 posts)The RT story quotes both the Times and the Daily Beast.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)I guess RT is trying to take fake new's place huh.
conservaphobe
(1,284 posts)jakeXT
(10,575 posts)reorg
(3,317 posts)The Col. must have read it to the caller from the WT when she was eager to learn whether the US will finally DO SOMETHING to go against the evil Russians
Anyway, it is still interesting to see that the US is already "advising" the military of Ukraine (and presumably what kind of hardware they might need).
GeorgeGist
(25,311 posts)Was too transparent.
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)It has goodies like non-NATO ally status
http://journal-neo.org/2014/07/19/legislating-the-way-to-world-war-3/
https://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/2277
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)Obama shouldn't be going for anything other than a cease-fire, truce or power sharing agreement at this time.
lexx21
(321 posts)It started with "advisers" then some troops, then an ass load of troops.........
We really need to stay out of that crap completely.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)and ratcheting this up.
herding cats
(19,558 posts)My guess is it's another Washington Times exaggeration.
broiles
(1,367 posts)herding cats
(19,558 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)are gonna keep fucking around until they start WWIII.