Mississippi Abortion Clinic Law Struck Down By Appeals Court Panel
Last edited Tue Jul 29, 2014, 04:26 PM - Edit history (2)
Source: Huffington Post
A federal appeals court panel has ruled that a Mississippi law that would close the state's only abortion clinic is unconstitutional.
The three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued its ruling Tuesday in a case involving the state's 2012 law, which required physicians at the clinic to obtain admitting privileges at a local hospital.
Physicians at Jackson Women's Health Organization applied for the privileges at Jackson-area hospitals but were unable to obtain them.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/29/mississippi-abortion-clinic_n_5631133.html?&ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000016
(snip)
The appeals court panel ruled that a U.S. Supreme Court decision in 1973 established a constitutional right to abortion. The panel ruled that Mississippi may not shift its obligation for established constitutional rights of its citizens to another state.
http://www.wapt.com/politics/us-appeals-panel-strikes-down-mississippi-abortion-law/27209788#!bp2DiO
US appeals panel strikes down Miss. abortion law
http://www.wistv.com/story/26142081/us-appeals-panel-strikes-down-miss-abortion-law
US APPEALS PANEL STRIKES DOWN MISS. ABORTION LAW
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/us-appeals-panel-strikes-down-miss-abortion-law
(snip)
Attorneys for Mississippi argued that if the clinic closed, women could get abortions in other states.
"Today's ruling ensures women who have decided to end a pregnancy will continue, for now, to have access to safe, legal care in their home state," Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a news release.
Appeals Court Saves Mississippis Only Abortion Clinic
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2014/07/29/3465501/appeals-court-saves-mississippis-only-abortion-clinic/
On Tuesday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down a law that would have closed down Mississippis only abortion clinic, invalidating a 2012 measure requiring abortion doctors to obtain admitting privileges at local hospitals. The states only two abortion providers fly in from out of state to serve patients and were repeatedly denied partnerships with local hospitals.
The three-judge panel ruled that since the U.S. Supreme Court established a constitutional right to abortion, Mississippi may not shift its obligation for established constitutional rights of its citizens to another state, the Associated Press reports.
Pre-viability, a woman has the constitutional right to end her pregnancy by abortion. H.B. 1390 effectively extinguishes that right within Mississippis borders, judges E. Grady Jolly of Mississippi and Stephan A. Higginson of Louisiana wrote in the 2-1 ruling. Jolly was appointed by President Ronald Reagan, while Higginson was appointed by President Barack Obama.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-mississippi-abortion-law-20140729-story.html
(snip)
In a dissenting opinion, Judge Emilio M. Garza wrote that he felt neither the lower district court nor the judges in the majority on his panel had undertaken a proper assessment to gauge the difficulty in obtaining abortion services in neighboring states.
(Appointed by Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush)
jmowreader
(50,554 posts)These laws are not designed JUST to end abortion in their states, they're designed to overturn Roe.
lark
(23,091 posts)hahahahahaha. See, there are still some who don't buy into your all out war on women.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)enlightenment
(8,830 posts)Gets right to the heart of the matter. Good for them.
WinstonSmith4740
(3,056 posts)Ruling that states can't slough off Constitutionally guaranteed rights to other states is very interesting. This could have wide ranging impact, including voting rights, marriage equality, etc.
I think Rachel would give this a "watch this space" rating.
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)It has very broad implications.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)And here we see where those who claim to follow the Constitution and Jeebus diverge.
cheyanne
(733 posts)It sounds like the judge is saying that Mississippi can't force closure of abortion clinics if that would extinguish the availability of abortions. However, there are other laws that limit abortions by prescribing width of corridors/rooms and otherwise making it harder to perform abortions. Will these laws be affected by this ruling? Does the ruling depend on the fact that all the clinics in Mississippi would close?
littlemissmartypants
(22,632 posts)theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)'Bout time the theocracy met democracy!
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... one clinic in the state of Mississippi that can perform abortions. One.
There should be as many full-service women's clinics as there are males who have the physical ability to impregnate females. In other words, there should be one on every other corner.
OK, one in every county in every state in the country.
niyad
(113,259 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)You know what I really think? I think abortions & D&Cs should be performed in the hospital, where hysterectomies, tubal ligations are performed and where babies are born. Period (no pun intended!) BC pills and RU486 (the morning-after pill, Plan B, or whatever they call it) should be as cheap as prophylactics.
niyad
(113,259 posts)Rowdyboy
(22,057 posts)Three white guys deciding life or death issues of women's health. At least they got this one right.