Tony Blair 'could face war crimes charges' over Iraq War
Source: The Telegraph (UK)
Tony Blair could face war crimes charges as a result of the Iraq war inquiry report, the House of Lords has been told.
Lord Dykes of Harrow Weald, a Liberal Democrat peer, claimed that the publication of the inquiry by Sir John Chilcot was being delayed to prolong the agony of the former Labour Prime Minister.
Lord Hurd who as Douglas Hurd was Conservative foreign secretary from 1989 to 1995 said the delay was now "becoming a scandal".
Lord Wallace of Saltaire, a Government minister, disclosed for the first time that talks over the publication of the gist of conversations between Mr Blair and George W Bush, the former US president, were now completed.
Read more: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/tony-blair/11328177/Tony-Blair-could-face-war-crimes-charges-over-Iraq-War.html
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)We'll see if it happens. If so, maybe we could get Cheney and Bush the Lesser as well.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Bush the lesser.
heh.
hah hah.
HOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHOHO!
I must use that sometime.
global1
(25,237 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)anyone who thinks they wont fight harder to seize the office this time
is a damned fool.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)That thought had never crossed my mind.
Thanks for the little addition to my patchwork quilt of paranoid speculations. I'll work it in.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)again just like his brother did. After all, why not? His brother got way with it.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)about how W got elected the first time. I could not believe it. Still don't. (Well, I do, but there is assorted pain and anguish related to that memory).
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)When did it stop?
reddread
(6,896 posts)someday.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)torture anymore. But if we are doing it with his acquiescence then he deserves to be put on trial along with Bush, Cheney, Rummy and the gang.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)And a big fat pardon will be the first thing on the agenda.
on point
(2,506 posts)Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)differentiate between father & son?
"A Mr. Bush of the CIA," to quote the FBI.
totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)ran the only CIA that apparently did its job, before that shitheel Cheney decided to politicize it. As the CIA chief under him, there was no torture, no assassinations (that we know of), and no 9/11 gifts from commercial passengers.
I did like his tax increases, too, since it was a shot in the arm for the economy.
Comparing the three, daddums was the least objectionable one. Jeb, I think, is the snakiest, and W's adult onset alcohol syndrome says everything that needs to be said about the Lesser.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)diabeticman
(3,121 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)There has been way too much of "delayed" truth.
samsingh
(17,594 posts)he's a disgusting weasil
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)Maybe he'll rat out Bush to save his own ass!
TexasTowelie
(112,056 posts)Welcome to DU!
LiberalLovinLug
(14,168 posts)Key word "could". No way in hell the .1% would allow that. Especially a Britain ruled by Cons at the moment, despite the temptation to humble a former leader of the opposition party. They have the same backers as BushCo. AND his poodle.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)He was only following orders! (Ooops, that didn't work so well at Nuremburg).
belzabubba333
(1,237 posts)reddread
(6,896 posts)Pelosi should be on the same docket.
tanyev
(42,540 posts)tavernier
(12,374 posts)to lean on, since Wendi leaned on him.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)If it happens...