Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,494 posts)
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 09:30 PM Jan 2015

MetLife to challenge 'too-big-to-fail' tag

Source: AP-Excite

NEW YORK (AP) — MetLife is challenging its government designation as a company that is "too big to fail" because it would pose such a risk to the economy.

The designation brings with it stricter guidelines from federal overseers and the company says, exorbitant costs.

The life insurance company said Tuesday that it will file with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to overturn the Financial Stability Oversight Council's designation of the New York company as a non-bank, systemically important financial institution.

Companies deemed "systemically important" are obligated to increase the money held in reserve to protect against huge losses, limit their use of borrowed money and submit to inspections by Fed examiners.

FULL story at link.


Read more: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20150113/us--metlife-too_big_to_fail-2d16a9bc03.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MetLife to challenge 'too-big-to-fail' tag (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jan 2015 OP
Cool by me. Jackpine Radical Jan 2015 #1
+1 n/t christx30 Jan 2015 #3
It's interesting, on the subject of too big, elleng Jan 2015 #2
Not unless they split up. Because this will remove oversight, and leave them free to pursue bad jtuck004 Jan 2015 #4
Any insurance company should be "too big to fail." Otherwise, they steal our premiums McCamy Taylor Jan 2015 #5
Yep... RobinA Jan 2015 #6

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
1. Cool by me.
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 09:39 PM
Jan 2015

This means they get not one red cent from the Gubmint the next time they run their corporation into the wall, right?

And maybe they should be about paying us back for what they scammed us out of last time.

elleng

(130,728 posts)
2. It's interesting, on the subject of too big,
Tue Jan 13, 2015, 09:40 PM
Jan 2015

MetLife implements the Federal Government Employees' Life Insurance program. http://www.opm.gov/healthcare-insurance/life-insurance/reference-materials/publications-forms/fegli-handbook/

I didn't know this until, after my husband's death, I had to help his beneficiaries (our daughters and others) to receive their benefits.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
4. Not unless they split up. Because this will remove oversight, and leave them free to pursue bad
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 12:44 AM
Jan 2015

business practices.

Then, when they fail, and they will, we will bail them out, if we are still enriching criminals and living on the backs of the more vulnerable by then. And they know that.

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
5. Any insurance company should be "too big to fail." Otherwise, they steal our premiums
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 01:59 AM
Jan 2015

and they waltz off into the sunset without paying the bills.

RobinA

(9,886 posts)
6. Yep...
Wed Jan 14, 2015, 09:06 AM
Jan 2015

Prudential, also too big to fail, has my long term care insurance. One big worry of mine has been that they will go down before I need long term care and take my premiums with them. I was thrilled to learn they were too big to fail. I've seen too many people lose insurance and pensions they thought they had. A service they thought they had purchased.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»MetLife to challenge 'too...