Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Stephen Retired

(190 posts)
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 05:51 PM Jan 2015

Patriots' Tom Brady: 'I wouldn't do anything to break the rules'

Source: USA Today

FOXBOROUGH, Mass. — New England Patriots quarterback Tom Brady addressed the team's Deflategate controversy Thursday afternoon.

"I didn't alter the ball in any way," said Brady, explaining he has a "process" to select the balls prior to any game, including Sunday's 45-7 AFC Championship Game victory over the Indianapolis Colts.

"I don't want anyone touching the balls after that ... to me those balls are perfect," he said of his pregame routine.

"Now that happened (balls were altered) obviously on Sunday night." However, he said he didn't detect a change over the course of Sunday night and didn't notice any difference in air pressure between the first and second halves of the game.

"I didn't think twice about it," said Brady. "Once I approve the ball, that's the ball I expect out there on the field."

Read more: http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/patriots/2015/01/22/tom-brady-deflategate-reaction-underinflated-balls-bill-belichick-colts/22172661/



See? No scandal here!
43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Patriots' Tom Brady: 'I wouldn't do anything to break the rules' (Original Post) Stephen Retired Jan 2015 OP
So- is he saying he picks deflated balls?nt bravenak Jan 2015 #1
He's saying he picks the balls he's comfortable with Stephen Retired Jan 2015 #2
Or like the tomato squeeze test ... nt King_Klonopin Jan 2015 #32
They have to be inspected by the officials before the game. George II Jan 2015 #4
I hope they give those balls a proper rubbing and squeezing in the future. bravenak Jan 2015 #6
With just the right amount of pressure. lovemydog Jan 2015 #16
Good point MissDeeds Jan 2015 #14
And then they're given back to the team for pre-game tabasco Jan 2015 #41
My point is that about 2 hours before the game they met the regulations. Then... George II Jan 2015 #43
"I am not a crook." nt geek tragedy Jan 2015 #3
Has ANYONE thought of inspecting the Colts balls to see what pressure THEY were? George II Jan 2015 #5
They were inspected NobodyHere Jan 2015 #9
Was this after the game or the usual pre-game inspection? George II Jan 2015 #17
What I've gathered from the news coverage is this: ColesCountyDem Jan 2015 #18
Checked at the same time as the Pats deflated balls. NobodyHere Jan 2015 #33
Good point MissDeeds Jan 2015 #12
Al-Queda? King George III? n/t christx30 Jan 2015 #30
There are 4 teams that could benefit from it. Angleae Jan 2015 #31
Just because someone or some group liberalhistorian Jan 2015 #36
He thinks his balls are perfect but they were deflated Happyhippychick Jan 2015 #7
He didn't say they were deflated. George II Jan 2015 #10
I didn't say that he said they were deflated. I said he thinks they were perfect. Happyhippychick Jan 2015 #11
"...but I would let Josh McDaniels do it for me" nt tishaLA Jan 2015 #8
Why would you say something like that about McDaniels? Dr. Strange Jan 2015 #20
People are becoming obessed with BALLS... TerrapinFlyer Jan 2015 #13
doesn't change a thing frylock Jan 2015 #15
What "doesn't change a thing".. your post? TerrapinFlyer Jan 2015 #19
It doesn't matter if they would have won liberalhistorian Jan 2015 #37
I am assuming you have the proof they cheated.... TerrapinFlyer Jan 2015 #40
No, I don't have absolute proof liberalhistorian Jan 2015 #42
Am I mistaken, or did they play better in the 2nd half (with the inflated footballs). C Moon Jan 2015 #21
They played WAY better Nyc72dem Jan 2015 #28
I don't see a problem here madokie Jan 2015 #22
Unless he's lying oberliner Jan 2015 #23
In your eyes he is anyway madokie Jan 2015 #24
And every football player who has been asked oberliner Jan 2015 #25
Let it rest madokie Jan 2015 #26
OK I'm good with that oberliner Jan 2015 #27
Really? His being a liar wouldn't liberalhistorian Jan 2015 #38
I'll take one for the Team! I volunteer to check Tom Brady's balls. Raster Jan 2015 #29
It's an intention to cheat shawn703 Jan 2015 #34
Thank you. That's the very point liberalhistorian Jan 2015 #39
ROFLMAO! liberalhistorian Jan 2015 #35
 

Stephen Retired

(190 posts)
2. He's saying he picks the balls he's comfortable with
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 06:07 PM
Jan 2015

They've already been inflated. It's like feeling eggs before you boil them, so you get a sense of which ones are likely not to bust.

George II

(67,782 posts)
43. My point is that about 2 hours before the game they met the regulations. Then...
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 06:33 PM
Jan 2015

...all throughout the game one official touched the ball before EVERY play. Funny how that person didn't notice anything funny but a Colt's defensive player, who touched the ball once (an interception) noticed that something was wrong.

People are blaming Belichick, Brady, and the Patriots. But how about the official who spotted the ball before EVERY play - was he sleeping? Didn't he notice a difference between the Patriots' balls and the Colts' balls during the first half?

ColesCountyDem

(6,943 posts)
18. What I've gathered from the news coverage is this:
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 07:19 PM
Jan 2015

The 12 balls supplied by the Colts were checked pre-game, at half time and post-game, and were found to be properly inflated.

 

MissDeeds

(7,499 posts)
12. Good point
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 06:39 PM
Jan 2015

The Pats didn't need to cheat to win the game; they were favored to win. The question is who would benefit most by discrediting the Patriots.

Angleae

(4,482 posts)
31. There are 4 teams that could benefit from it.
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 04:31 AM
Jan 2015

If the Patriots ultimately lose draft picks, Buffalo, Miami, and New York (Jets) could be boosted. Also the Seahawks due to the constant questioning taking away from preparation for the Super Bowl.

liberalhistorian

(20,814 posts)
36. Just because someone or some group
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 03:13 PM
Jan 2015

doesn't need to cheat doesn't mean that they won't. I grew up with teacher parents, who saw more than their fair share of smart students cheating when they didn't need to do so.

And BeliCHEAT and the Cheatriots already have a history of this. It wouldn't surprise me at all if they pulled this off.

George II

(67,782 posts)
10. He didn't say they were deflated.
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 06:26 PM
Jan 2015

I mentioned this elsewhere here, did anyone think of inspecting the Colts' balls too? Who knows, they might have been in the same condition. How often do they inspect balls during or after a game in the course of the regular season?

I wouldn't be surprised if this is something that is very common but no one whined about it before.

Happyhippychick

(8,379 posts)
11. I didn't say that he said they were deflated. I said he thinks they were perfect.
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 06:28 PM
Jan 2015

But I was really just making a joke about men and balls.

Dr. Strange

(25,917 posts)
20. Why would you say something like that about McDaniels?
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 07:47 PM
Jan 2015

He doesn't have a history of cheatin--

Oh, never mind.

 

TerrapinFlyer

(277 posts)
13. People are becoming obessed with BALLS...
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 06:39 PM
Jan 2015

I am not a Patriots or a Colts fan....

The Patriots crushed the Colts. They could have used a basketball, and the score would have been the same.

People need to stop whining about the balls. It's a GAME!

liberalhistorian

(20,814 posts)
37. It doesn't matter if they would have won
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 03:15 PM
Jan 2015

anyway. Cheating is cheating, period. In fact, its kind of worse when a person or team would have won or passed anyway and yet they cheated. It's like saying that a student shouldn't be punished for cheating because they would have passed anyway. Yes, they very well may have, but that still doesn't excuse their cheating or make it right.

 

TerrapinFlyer

(277 posts)
40. I am assuming you have the proof they cheated....
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 05:27 PM
Jan 2015

otherwise you are just another obsessed ball conspiracy theorist.

liberalhistorian

(20,814 posts)
42. No, I don't have absolute proof
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 06:32 PM
Jan 2015

and we can't know for sure yet what, if anything, really happened or who was responsible. I'm saying IF it turns out to be true then it is still wrong regardless of whether or not they would have won anyway.

I seem to recall "spygate" being dismissed and considered a "conspiratorial" attempt to "discredit" the Pats, also, before the truth came out and it cost the team big time.

And nice red herring there. Instead of addressing whether or not cheating is wrong even if you'd have won otherwise, you do nothing but throw around the words "obsessed" and "conspiracy."

madokie

(51,076 posts)
24. In your eyes he is anyway
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 09:23 PM
Jan 2015

but that only matters to you and like minded individuals. To me it matters not

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
25. And every football player who has been asked
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 09:26 PM
Jan 2015

Have you read/seen Mark Brunell or Jerome Bettis's comments to name just two?

madokie

(51,076 posts)
26. Let it rest
Thu Jan 22, 2015, 09:33 PM
Jan 2015

It really is not an advantage whether the ball was right on, under or over inflated. It mattered not to the outcome of that game. The patriots kicked the colts ass up one side of the field and down the other the whole game and at one point the pressure was right on according to what I read

Let it rest and lets get on with important things that need to be discussed that might make a difference.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
29. I'll take one for the Team! I volunteer to check Tom Brady's balls.
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 01:12 AM
Jan 2015

Sometimes you just got to step up and do what's right!

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
34. It's an intention to cheat
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 01:53 PM
Jan 2015

Whether or not the Patriots needed to cheat to win (a 38 point victory would suggest they didn't need to do it) is irrelevant.

If a Republican happens to win in 2016 by 4 points and only intended to steal 2 or 3 points through vote flipping, would it be okay to dismiss it as inconsequential since without the vote flipping the Republican would have won anyway?

liberalhistorian

(20,814 posts)
39. Thank you. That's the very point
Fri Jan 23, 2015, 03:17 PM
Jan 2015

I've been trying to get across and you've said it much better than me.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Patriots' Tom Brady: 'I w...