What Charlie Hebdo says about laughter, violence, and free speech
But comedy especially satire has historically been used by the socially marginalized and powerless to deftly critique, deflate, and humanize those in power. Every royal court had its jester. Jonathan Swift made a modest proposal. Cartoonist Thomas Nast challenged the corruption of Tammany Hall. And nightly, many tune in to The Daily Show.
Laughter, therefore, is most effective when it comes from below to mock and diminish the powerful. Yet when laughter comes from above (the powerful) and is aimed at the powerless it often comes across as mean-spirited bullying. In this respect, the description of Charlie Hebdo as a bunch of white men punching down is an accurate characterization of the periodicals cartoons along with the anti-Irish, anti-black, and anti-women editorial cartoons weve seen throughout history.
This however is what lead me to post the essay.
Recently I was teasing my eight-year-old daughter, thinking I was being playful and celebrating what she had gotten wrong in an adorable way. She hit me in the leg and I reminded her that in our house we use words, not hands. She said she didnt know what to say. Unable to carry on the conversation, she responded with a different language: violence.
http://theconversation.com/what-charlie-hebdo-says-about-laughter-violence-and-free-speech-36057