Witnesses Against Death Row Grandmother Admit they Lied Following Threats from Prosecutors
Monday, February 16, 2015 - 3:30pm
Witnesses Against Death Row Grandmother Admit they Lied Following Threats from Prosecutors
WASHINGTON - Key witnesses against a British grandmother on death row in Texas have said that prosecutors in her 2002 trial threatened or blackmailed them into testifying against her.
Among them is the only person who claimed to have seen Linda Carty (56) carry out the murder of Joanna Rodriguez, who has now admitted that Texan District Attorneys (DAs) threatened me and intimidated me into identifying Ms Carty as the culprit. Christopher Robinson, who was the key to the prosecution case, admits that he never saw Ms Carty kill anyone and his testimony to this extent at trial was a lie.
Mr Robinson has signed an affidavit, filed in September 2014, in which he testifies that prosecutors told me I had to testify at Lindas trial to avoid the death penalty, and they made it clear what it was I had to say. Mr Robinson adds that they [told] me I would get the death penalty myself if Linda Carty did not get the death penalty.
Several other witnesses at Ms Cartys trial have also admitted they were blackmailed by Texan prosecutors, and lied or omitted evidence as a result.
More:
http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2015/02/16/witnesses-against-death-row-grandmother-admit-they-lied-following-threats
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Old Codger
(4,205 posts)It happens all the time all over the country...Not just Texas
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
Stuart G
(38,414 posts)Last edited Tue Feb 17, 2015, 08:31 AM - Edit history (1)
from the first link below.......:
The new testimony which was unearthed by lawyers at international legal non-profit Reprieve following years of work and investigation is currently being considered by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA). Ms Cartys lawyers are asking for an evidentiary hearing to air this newly discovered evidence and ultimately seek a new trial.
Commenting, Clare Algar, Executive Director of Reprieve said:
If Linda is not granted a new hearing, she faces the death penalty based on lies extracted by prosecutors desperate to secure an execution at any cost. The behaviour of prosecutors in this case has been so appalling it takes the breath away. They have stooped to targeting the marriage of one witness with invented slurs, while using the threat of death to force another to produce the lies they needed for conviction. Lindas last hope is that Texas recognises that she deserves a new and this time fair trial.
http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/DEA-agent-former-eyewitness-allege-prosecutorial-6080417.php#/0
https://alethonews.wordpress.com/tag/connie-spence/
from the second link:
Charles Mathis, a former Drugs Enforcement Agency (DEA) officer who was Ms Cartys handler during the time she worked as an informer for the Agency has stepped forward to reveal the lengths the prosecutors went to obtain the testimony they needed. Mr Mathis affidavit states that when he told the Texan DA that he knew that Linda did not have it in her to kill anyone, and so did not want to testify against her, the DA threatened me with an invented affair that I was supposed to have had with Linda.
I felt that [Texas DA Connie] Spence was threatening and blackmailing me into testifying, Mr Mathis concludes. It struck me that Spence wanted a death sentence as a feather in her cap. She was far more interested in a death conviction that the truth.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)honest judges there.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...or their insane judges ever go to jail.
- I'm sorry if you live there, but fuck Texas.
K&R
marym625
(17,997 posts)Seriously. Are they that sure someone did something? Or are they that fucking sick, twisted egomaniacs that they need to get someone and it doesn't matter who?
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)They are such fucking sick, twisted egomaniacs that they need to get someone and it doesn't matter who.
They are out to rack up a high conviction rate and they don't care about justice. In fact justice is often the victim of our adversarial court system. Many complain about defense attorneys defending clients they know are guilty but seldom do they complain about prosecutors persecuting innocent people because they can make a case against them by hook or crook.
marym625
(17,997 posts)Just absolutely horrific.
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)Now Perry never lost a case (I did hear he lost one?!?!). The cases were always portrayed as both sides seeking the truth. Berger had no problem conceding to Perry when his case was destroyed. I know it is fiction but it would be nice if life would imitate art at least a little bit in our justice system.
I really don't have a solution. Next month I am up for jury duty. I have never made it past the "voir dire", as the prosecutors don't like my attitude about the way the courts work. People we say "so and so" had a "fair" trial-they had a court appointed defense attorney. I always ask, "Which would you rather have, a court appointed attorney or O.J.'s Dream Team?" The answer is always O.J.'s defense team.
If you have the resources to afford the best you have a better chance at getting a not guilty verdict. The prosecutor has enormous resources at his/her fingertips. They have the police and labs plus a budget that allows for expert witnesses and the full might of the DA's office while a court appointed attorney or a public defender has very shallow pockets.
marym625
(17,997 posts)I watched the documentary Weather Underground last night. One of the participants mentioned that they really thought they would be caught within a few months. They believed it because of movies and TV in the 50s and 60s and that the cops and prosecutors always got the "bad guys"
onecaliberal
(32,821 posts)Stuart G
(38,414 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Stuart G
(38,414 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)Stuart G
(38,414 posts)Hopefully we will find the truth, but this is Texas, and I wouldn't be surprised if the whole thing is ignored, and the prosecutors career is saved. This would not be the first time Texas has ignored truth in cases like this. I recall a former Republican governor seemed to be proud of the 115 executions during his tenure. He never once stayed an execution on any grounds. I recall he was sure all were guilty....
In Illinois a number people on death row were proven to be innocent. (I think it was about 12 of 25 on death row) That former Republican governor, stayed all executions on the grounds that people were not getting a fair trial. Eventually, Illinois did away with the death penalty. That Republican governor, George Ryan, eventually went to jail..How odd. One stays executions and goes to jail on corruption, and another is proud of lots of executions in 1996-2000 ,George Bush, and becomes President of the United States. (and for what he has done, in other areas, he belongs in jail too)
I sure hope that the truth is uncovered in this case of everyone lying because of an overzealous and corrupt prosecutor. But I wouldn't bet on it, given Texas history on this subject.
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... WHY?!!? Why couldn't they devote all that malicious energy to finding whoever REALLY committed the crime? Because, like most prosecutors, it seems, they're all incompetent sociopaths who would lie to their dying mothers for idle amusement, and getting a quick conviction to pad their resumes is more important than an innocent person's life.
Ah, but in the words of Pox News, "She's probably no angel!" So such malignant malice is perfectly justified, right? I would say that they have the ethics and morality of a pack of hyenas, but that would an insult to hyenas. Everyone responsible for this travesty is filth beneath contempt. But then, it IS Texas, so what do you expect? I'm sure there are good, decent people in Texas, but where are they both hiding?
Judi Lynn
(160,516 posts)Witnesses Against a British Grandmother on Death Row Say Texas Prosecutors Blackmailed Them Into Testimony
By Jenna Corderoy
February 17, 2015 | 6:19 am
Key witnesses against a British grandmother on death row in Texas have claimed that prosecutors in her 2002 trial intimidated, threatened, and blackmailed them into testifying against her, raising serious questions about a conviction which has been long protested by campaigners and the UK government.
Linda Carty was convicted for the kidnap and murder of her 25-year-old neighbor Joana Rodriguez, who was abducted along with her four-day-old son by three men in May 2001. The baby was found alive, yet Rodriguez was found suffocated in the boot of a car. It was claimed during the trial that Carty had hired the gang of men to steal the child so that she could raise him as her own. According to the Houston Chronicle, the three men who abducted Rodriguez and her child all had criminal records, but only Carty was prosecuted for capital murder.
Carty, now 56, has been on death row ever since. The US Supreme Court refused her appeal in May 2010.
Carty has always maintained her innocence, and campaign groups, as well as the British government, have highlighted serious flaws in her trial. According to human rights organization Reprieve, Carty was forced to accept a court-appointed lawyer, Gerald Guerinot, whose poor professional reputation has been covered in detail by the New York Times and whose astonishing tally of clients given the death penalty has been described by the American Bar Association Journal as a "possible record" in modern times. The British government complained that they were not notified of Carty's case, and that there was "ineffective assistance of counsel." It raised the issue with the then governor of Texas, Rick Perry, during his visit to the UK in 2013.
Key witnesses against a British grandmother on death row in Texas have claimed that prosecutors in her 2002 trial intimidated, threatened, and blackmailed them into testifying against her, raising serious questions about a conviction which has been long protested by campaigners and the UK government.
More:
https://news.vice.com/article/witnesses-against-a-british-grandmother-on-death-row-say-texas-prosecutors-blackmailed-them-into-testimony
[center]
Linda Carty
[/center]
From the Independent, years ago:
Hope for Carty as court debates death penalty
By Guy Adams in Gatesville , Texas
Monday 06 December 2010
The latest skirmish in America's ongoing debate over capital punishment will take place in a court in Houston this morning, where lawyers for an accused murderer called John Edward Green will argue that the system has become so unreliable as to be an affront to natural justice.
They are likely to cite the fact that since 1976, when the US restored capital punishment, 136 death row inmates have been exonerated, including at least 12 in Texas.
At least one man has already been wrongfully put to death by the Lone Star State: last month, DNA testing revealed that a single hair used to convict Claude Howard Jones, who was executed for murdering a shop assistant in 1999, came not from him as the jury had originally been told but from the victim.
The innocence of another executed man is meanwhile the subject of heated debate. Cameron Todd Willingham was executed in 2004 after being convicted of starting a fire that killed his three daughters. But forensic experts have recently claimed that he was innocent, and that prosecutors obscured crucial evidence during his trial.
An official inquiry into his case by the Texas Forensic Science Commission will report next month. Its members have already admitted that there were serious "flaws" in Willingham's treatment.
Linda Carty's treatment at the hands of the Texan legal system is also said to have been riddled with basic errors. Carty, who emigrated to the US in the early 1980s to attend university, has always claimed British citizenship due to being born and raised on the Caribbean island of St Kitts. Under the Vienna Convention, UK authorities should therefore have immediately been informed of her arrest in 2001.
More:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/hope-for-carty-as-court-debates-death-penalty-2152194.html
Judi Lynn
(160,516 posts)DEA agent, former eyewitness allege prosecutorial misconduct in Linda Carty murder case
DEA agent, witness say prosecutors forced their hands
By Lise Olsen |
February 13, 2015 | Updated: February 14, 2015 10:53pm
Linda Carty has lingered on Texas death row for more than a decade, convicted of plotting the murder of her neighbor, Joana Rodriguez, in order to steal Rodriguez's newborn baby in 2001.
Her previous appeals have all failed - despite international protests over the fact that her Harris County-appointed attorneys spent only two weeks preparing for her capital trial. Her conviction rested on the prosecution's theory that Carty, a former school teacher from the Caribbean island of St. Kitts, directed three men with criminal histories to storm the victims' apartment, steal $1,000 and carry out the mother and child's abduction at gunpoint.
Now she's gained support for a new appeal from two unlikely sources: the DEA agent for whom she was once a confidential informant and a star prosecution witness who has now recanted.
~ snip ~
Front-page case
Carty holds British citizenship, and her case has generated a documentary film, front-page news stories in London newspapers and appeals from celebrities, like Bianca Jagger. In an amicus brief, the British government has argued the court should order a hearing so that a Harris County judge can consider whether Carty's death sentence came only after prosecutors coerced key witnesses to testify.
Carty was the last death penalty trial for defense attorney Gerald Guerinot, who over the years saw 20 clients condemned to death row - a number described by the American Bar Association Journal as a "possible record" for any capital attorney in modern times.
More:
http://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/DEA-agent-former-eyewitness-allege-prosecutorial-6080417.php#/0
[center]
[/center]