Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,516 posts)
Thu Feb 26, 2015, 11:00 PM Feb 2015

Fact Not Fiction: US Aggression Against Venezuela

February 26, 2015

Fact Not Fiction

US Aggression Against Venezuela

by EVA GOLINGER


Recently, several different spokespersons for the Obama administration have firmly claimed the United States government is not intervening in Venezuelan affairs. Department of State spokeswoman Jen Psaki went so far as to declare, “The allegations made by the Venezuelan government that the United States is involved in coup plotting and destabilization are baseless and false.” Psaki then reiterated a bizarrely erroneous statement she had made during a daily press briefing just a day before: “The United States does not support political transitions by non-constitutional means”.

Anyone with minimal knowlege of Latin America and world history knows Psaki’s claim is false, and calls into question the veracity of any of her prior statements. The U.S. government has backed, encouraged and supported coup d’etats in Latin America and around the world for over a century. Some of the more notorious ones that have been openly acknowledged by former U.S. presidents and high level officials include coup d’etats against Mohammed Mossadegh in Iran in 1953, Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala in 1954, Patrice Lumumba in the Congo in 1960, Joao Goulart of Brazil in 1964 and Salvador Allende in Chile in 1973. More recently, in the twenty-first century, the U.S. government openly supported the coups against President Hugo Chavez in Venezuela in 2002, Jean Bertrand Aristide of Haiti in 2004 and Jose Manuel Zelaya of Honduras in 2009. Ample evidence of CIA and other U.S. agency involvement in all of these unconstitutional overthrows of democratically-elected governments abounds. What all of the overthrown leaders had in common was their unwillingness to bow to U.S. interests.

Despite bogus U.S. government claims, after Hugo Chavez was elected president of Venezuela by an overwhelming majority in 1998, and subsequently refused to take orders from Washington, he became a fast target of U.S. aggression. Though a U.S.-supported coup d’etat briefly overthrew Chavez in 2002, his subsequent rescue by millions of Venezuelans and loyal armed forces, and his return to power, only increased U.S. hostility towards the oil-rich nation. After Chavez’s death in 2013 from cancer, his democratically-elected successor, Nicolas Maduro, became the brunt of these attacks.

What follows is a brief summary and selection of U.S. aggression towards Venezuela that clearly shows a one-sided war. Venezuela has never threatened or taken any kind of action to harm the United States or its interests. Nonetheless, Venezuela, under both Chavez and Maduro – two presidents who have exerted Venezuela’s sovereignty and right to self-determination – has been the ongoing victim of continuous, hostile and increasingly unfriendly actions from Washington.

More:
http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/02/26/us-aggression-against-venezuela/

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Judi Lynn

(160,516 posts)
3. Rounding up political opponents happened at the hands of the Venezuelan opposition during its coup
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 05:15 PM
Feb 2015

against Hugo Chavez, when they chased down and arrested as many Chavez administration officials, workers as they could find, and put them in jail before dissolving the congress, supreme court, the Venezuelan constitution, etc. and putting their own puppet in place for two days, before the people of Venezuela discovered what they had done and overthrew them.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
4. And now Maduro has adopted their tactics, arresting elected officials of the opposition
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 05:19 PM
Feb 2015

party based on trumped-up charges of sedition.

Fun fact: he has prosecuted/arrested more elected officials of the opposition party in less than two years in office than Hugo Chavez did in his entire lifetime.

The past abuses of rightwing authoritarians are no excuse for leftwing authoritarianism.



Judi Lynn

(160,516 posts)
5. You would never know it.The right-wing trolls screeched their lungs out claiming Chavez was a tyrant
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 07:23 PM
Feb 2015

It would help your assertion if you posted credible links to your claim Maduro arrests "elected officials of the opposition
party based on trumped-up charges of sedition."

You know by now concerned people need actual credible sources.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. The opposition leaders have been arrested on accusations of treason.
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 07:29 PM
Feb 2015

No evidence has been offered, just claims by the dictator Maduro.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/feb/20/venezuela-agents-arrest-caracas-mayor

Maduro frequently denounces alleged coup plots by opposition leaders, usually without presenting concrete evidence. His predecessor, Hugo Chávez, survived a brief coup in 2002 amid protests supported by Ledezma as well as other opposition leaders.


When the head of state orders his political opponents imprisoned and charged with treason, without providing any evidence, it's crystal clear to anyone who isn't a die-hard authoritarian what is going on.

Those who have no problem with this are generally Stalinists, like the dumb thug Maduro is.

Notice that Chavez never pulled this kind of thuggishness.

Maduro is a leftwing Pinochet. He makes George W Bush look both brilliant and principled.

Judi Lynn

(160,516 posts)
7. "Those who have no problem with this are generally Stalinists, like the dumb thug Maduro is."
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 07:35 PM
Feb 2015

People who don't share your views are "generally Stalinists?" That's a hot one, isn't it?

You might want to take the time to have a thought or two in your head before calling your opposition "Stalinists." That's playing really dirty.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
8. If one a supports imprisoning political opponents
Fri Feb 27, 2015, 07:38 PM
Feb 2015

Last edited Fri Feb 27, 2015, 08:51 PM - Edit history (1)

in the complete absence of any evidence of criminal wrongdoing, that person is endorsing Stalinism and the label is accurate.

That shit does not happen in democracies. Only authoritarian regimes like Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Maduro's Venezuela.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Fact Not Fiction: US Aggr...