Putin Accuses West Of Double Standard Over Syria
October 23, 2015 7:27AM ET
Russian President Vladimir Putin has dismissed criticism over his countrys air campaign in Syria, accusing Western governments of a double standard in their support for the Syrian opposition.
Speaking on Thursday at a political conference in Sochi, Putin said the West is using some of the rebel groups as pawns to fit their wider agenda in the Middle East.
"Let's not play with words and divide the terrorists into moderate and not moderate," said Putin. I would like to understand what is the difference. Perhaps, some experts believe that moderate bandits behead people in moderate numbers or in some tender way."
Putins comments came ahead of a Friday meeting in Vienna, the Austrian capital, between Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and his counterparts from the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Turkey among the most vocal opponents of Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad government to discuss the crisis in Syria.
more...
http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2015/10/23/putin-accuses-west-of-double-standard-over-syria.html
newthinking
(3,982 posts)Full speech here (for those interested)
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)truth2power
(8,219 posts)Putin's speech at the 2014 Valdai Conference, "New Rules or a Game Without Rules?" was seen as his most significant foreign policy speech to that date. It was widely praised, worldwide.
You can easily find either the video or the text by searching any combination of the above terms. I usually find that it's more understandable to read a translation than try to listen to someone translating Russian to English in real time.
Here's a portion of a text translation of the current speech that I found interesting:
There is no need to play on words and divide terrorists into moderate and immoderate. What separates them? I would like to understand the difference. Perhaps, according to some experts, moderate bandits decapitate people in a moderate and gentle way. In fact, we now see a real tangle of terrorist organizations. Yes, sometimes they are rebels of the Islamic State, Al-Nusra Dzhabhat, all sorts of other heirs and factions of Al-Qaeda, they even fight each other. But then, they fight for money, for their share of the money, for the sources of the income flow, for the territory of the income flow - that's what they fight for, not for ideological reasons. But the essence and methods they have are the same they terrorize, murder, transform the people into a downtrodden, intimidated, docile mass.
ETA: Oops, sorry! Purveyor already quoted part of the above in the OP. It's late. I should be asleep.