Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
David Remnick on 2016 election
Written before the third Republican debate, and before Joe Biden's decision not to run.
But I think it's nevertheless an insightful overview :
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/10/26/stranger-than-fiction-a-turning-point-for-hillary-clinton
After putting this election in an interesting historical context (referencing some of the Republican candidates from the 1930's and 1940's), Remnick goes on to discuss the 2016 race so far.
Here are the concluding paragraphs (the first paragraph refers to the first Democratic debate)
One debate will not erase all of what many voters see as Clintons complications: the lingering perception of her sense of moneyed entitlement, her lawyerly slipperiness under questioning, the walled garden of her political circle, her interventionist reflexes, her belatedness on gay marriage, comprehensive immigration, and Wall Street reforms. But if Clinton was not flawless she and her debating partners managed one distinct achievement: they accentuated the chaos, the intellectual barrenness, and the general collapse of their rivals in the Republican Party.
Consider the political spectacle on Capitol Hill, in which Speaker John Boehner, hardly a Rockefeller Republican, could no longer deal with his caucus and, with little more than a chorus of Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah, announced his early retirement. Members of the caucus stepped forward to admit that the hearings on Benghazi were aimed less at uncovering the truth than at burying Hillary Clinton. An ambitious Party loyalist, Paul Ryan, is reluctant to run for Boehners chair because the House Republicans are the new Wild Bunch and, as a friend of Ryans put it to Politico, hes not a fing moron.
Consider, too, the G.O.P. candidates for the White House. Donald Trump and Ben Carson, the only Republicans polling in double digits, daily clear their throats with that ritual preface of modern self-satisfactionI am not politically correctand then unleash statements, positions, and postures so willfully detached from fact that they embarrass the political culture that harbors them. Trump is willing to say anythinganything racist, anything false, anything funnyto terrify voters, or rile them, or amuse them, depending on the moment. The worst of his demagogic arousals are reminiscent of Lindberghs speeches at America First rallies and his fear, as he wrote in Readers Digest, of a pressing sea of Yellow, Black and Brown. Carson, who seems as historically confused as he is surgically skilled, has said that Obamacare is worse than 9/11, because 9/11 is an isolated incident. Whats more, the two mens rivals either fall into line or lack the persuasive powers and the courage to marginalize candidates they know to be dangerous.
In electoral terms, Democrats had to view the weeks events with confidence. But there is pathos and foreboding here for the republic. In the debate, Clinton was clear who her enemies were: the Republicans. Reports of the death of the radical right are premature. In 2016, the G.O.P. is likely, at a minimum, to hold its majority in the House. If there is a campaign promise in 2016 that is almost sure to be fulfilled, it is that obstructionism and political war will continue, for within the G.O.P. the politics of perpetual fear goes on corroding not just a party but a nation.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 540 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post