"If Medicare for All was enacted, “we would, as a country, save nearly $5 trillion over ten years."
"The Sanders Medicare For All proposal would save the average family more than $5,000 per year. It also would increase, not lower, incomes for 95 percent of Americans, according to Professor Gerald Friedman, professor of economics at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Friedman writes that if Medicare for All was enacted, we would, as a country, save nearly $5 trillion over ten years in reduced administrative waste, lower pharmaceutical and device prices, and by lowering the rate of medical inflation.
Former Labor Secretary Robert Reich notes that:
Bernies proposals would cost less than what wed spend without them. Most of the cost . . . would pay for opening Medicare to everyone. This would be cheaper than relying on our current system of for-profit private health insurers that charge you and me huge administrative costs, advertising, marketing, bloated executive salaries, and high pharmaceutical prices.
Paul Waldman recently wrote in The Washington Post, Every single-payer system in the world, and there are many of them of varying flavors, is cheaper than the American health care system. Every single one. So
you cant say (Sanders proposal) represents some kind of profligate, free-spending idea that would cost us all terrible amounts of money.
http://commondreams.org/views/2016/01/05/why-sanders-economic-plan-best-99-percent
randys1
(16,286 posts)For profit RX, hospitals and insurance execs are the ones keeping us from this.
Why do we let them?
midnight
(26,624 posts)would start demanding Medicare for all?
randys1
(16,286 posts)msongs
(67,367 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Hasta la vista to the third-way crew in 2016.
highprincipleswork
(3,111 posts)Kind of sick of how we are dictated to by the Congress. Not that they would ever do what we, the people want. You know, if enough people stand up for it, anything is possible.
Progressives have to understand that no matter how good the idea or solid the principle, it has to be lobbied for. People have to stand up for it. We were given free will, which gives us the chance to make awful choices, if that is what we choose to do. And there are and have been so many voices repeating over and over again the worst possible and most false ideas possible. Like "taxes are bad, no taxes". This is an idiotic idea, for anyone who would like any government services at all, like a fire department, a post office, even a military. Grover Norquist thought this up when he was thirteen years old, and that is about the intellectual level of the idea. Which would be funny, if Republicans weren't required to sign allegiance to this idea when they enter Congress.
No, good ideas and high principles, no matter how good or how high, need human champions, the more the better.
This is why Bernie and his campaign are so powerful - they are filled with the right, powerful, and truthful ideas that the human heart can adopt, embrace, resonate with, because they simply are true or in the realm of truth at the very least.
We really need to grow more confident that this is the winning ticket and the winning way to operate. Stand up for the right, solid, truthful ideas, and they will be more powerful than anything. Surely more powerful than the darkness. Remember the movie "Field of Dreams"? Build it, and they will come.
Onward. Together. And I would say onward with the principles and policies adopted by Bernie Sanders.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Time for a change, time for Sanders.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Being for Medicare for all means you hate Obama, and are a racist.
midnight
(26,624 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Before that it was the far right heritage foundation plan. Now it's great though since a democrat signed it