Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 04:02 PM Mar 2016

The Clintons Have Not Changed: The Clintonian War on the IGs

By William K. Black
February 23, 2016 Bloomington, MN

Secretary Hillary Clinton is asking Democratic voters to believe that she has experienced a “Road to Damascus” conversion from her roots as a leader of the “New Democrats” – the Wall Street wing of the Democratic Party. When exactly this conversion occurred is never stated, but an interesting fact has emerged that demonstrates it did not occur during her service as the Secretary of State. A Wall Street Journal story provides the key facts, but none of the analysis.

Newly released emails indicate that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her top staff were involved in the selection process for the State Department’s internal watchdog, a position that ultimately went unfilled throughout her four-year tenure.

The WSJ’s angle is that such involvement in the selection of the Inspector General (IG) is a threat to the IG’s vital independence. True, and also true as the story notes that Hillary was far from rare as an agency or department head in seeking to select behind the scenes the supposedly independent IGs.

The function of the IG is to “speak truth to power.” Naturally, “power” hates IGs with a purple passion. Government leaders are most likely to hate having its abuses made public by IG when the government leader is secretly acting in concert with immensely powerful private leaders for their mutual benefit at the expense of the public.

in full:http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2016/03/clintons-not-changed-clintonian-war-igs.html#more-10101

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Clintons Have Not Changed: The Clintonian War on the IGs (Original Post) Jefferson23 Mar 2016 OP
This would be significant if anyone in the Dept. complained about having to use @clintonemail.com leveymg Mar 2016 #1
Good question. n/t Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #2
HRC's actions differed from Petraeus. But, it's not what her defenders say. What she did was worse leveymg Mar 2016 #5
" a position that ultimately went unfilled throughout her four-year tenure. " nt antigop Mar 2016 #3
Yep. lol Jefferson23 Mar 2016 #4

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
1. This would be significant if anyone in the Dept. complained about having to use @clintonemail.com
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 04:10 PM
Mar 2016

Seems she put everyone who worked for her, or communicated directly with her, in peril of violating security rules by transmitting over what is obviously a non-gov't server address. I wonder if anyone ever made an issue of it or even brought it up.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
5. HRC's actions differed from Petraeus. But, it's not what her defenders say. What she did was worse
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 04:27 PM
Mar 2016

Far worse. When David Petraeus retained his "black brief books" and shared them with his paramour, he put the two of them in legal jeopardy. When HRC set up a private server she never displayed any sort of warning or disclaimer on the messages to caution others that they were communicating on a non-secure, private system. In so doing, she required her aides to use it to email with her -- along with hundreds of other federal officials. In so doing, this caused them all significant risk, and some may be prosecuted for transmitting classified information across that unauthorized server.

This just seems to be incredibly irresponsible and callous of her to now be claiming head of agency immunity for herself and the information she posted that was classified at the moment it was written.

What a shitty boss.

Just wait until she's President and can claim Executive Privilege for everything she does.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
4. Yep. lol
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 04:21 PM
Mar 2016

How much else you need to know, I can't say..but Bernie needs to make
this abundantly clear to Americans.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»The Clintons Have Not Cha...