How 401(k)s have failed most American workers

[Zorro]

Today, many Americans rely on savings in 401(k)-type accounts to supplement Social Security in retirement. This is a pronounced shift from a few decades ago, when many retirees could count on predictable, constant streams of income from traditional pensions (see “Types of retirement plans,” below). This chartbook assesses the impact of the shift from pensions to individual savings by examining disparities in retirement preparedness and outcomes by income, race, ethnicity, education, gender, and marital status.

The first section of the chartbook looks at retirement-plan participation and retirement account savings of working-age families. The charts in this section focus on families headed by someone age 32–61, a 30-year period before the Social Security early eligibility age of 62 when most families should be accumulating pension benefits and retirement savings. The second section looks at income sources for seniors. Since many workers transition to retirement between Social Security’s early eligibility age and the program’s normal retirement age (currently 66, formerly 65), the charts in the second section focus on retirement outcomes of people age 65 and older.

http://www.epi.org/publication/retirement-in-america

Well worth the read. It's disturbing.

[Half-Century Man]

1. 401Ks were designed to shift the burden of costs off employeers

And drain saving from the workers with administrative costs.
Win/win for those with money. Lose/lose for the smucks.

[NBachers]

2. Not happy with the direction my 401k's hard-earned money has been going in:

[appalachiablue]

4. Exec speak, What's a 4 letter word for eff your employee? 401K Plan, David Cay Johnston.