Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 03:24 PM Mar 2016

On Trade, Angry Voters Have a Point

Were the experts wrong about the benefits of trade for the American economy?
From Our Advertisers

The nation’s working class will have another opportunity to demonstrate its political clout Tuesday night, as primary voters go to the polls in Illinois and Ohio, Rust Belt states that have suffered intensely from the loss of good manufacturing jobs. Last week, the insurrection handed Michigan’s Democratic primary to Bernie Sanders while continuing to buoy the insurgent Republican candidacy of Donald Trump.

Voters’ anger and frustration, driven in part by relentless globalization and technological change, may not propel either candidate to the presidency. But it is already having a big impact on America’s future, shaking a once-solid consensus that freer trade is, necessarily, a good thing.

“The economic populism of the presidential campaign has forced the recognition that expanded trade is a double-edged sword,” wrote Jared Bernstein, former economic adviser to Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.

What seems most striking is that the angry working class — dismissed so often as myopic, unable to understand the economic trade-offs presented by trade — appears to have understood what the experts are only belatedly finding to be true: The benefits from trade to the American economy may not always justify its costs.

In a recent study, three economists — David Autor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, David Dorn at the University of Zurich and Gordon Hanson at the University of California, San Diego — raised a profound challenge to all of us brought up to believe that economies quickly recover from trade shocks. In theory, a developed industrial country like the United States adjusts to import competition by moving workers into more advanced industries that can successfully compete in global markets.

more...

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/16/business/economy/on-trade-angry-voters-have-a-point.html?_r=0

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On Trade, Angry Voters Have a Point (Original Post) Purveyor Mar 2016 OP
Even public trade deals- cause massive lying in the US. Baobab Mar 2016 #1

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
1. Even public trade deals- cause massive lying in the US.
Tue Mar 15, 2016, 07:29 PM
Mar 2016

They cause a hell of a lot of lying here by politicians in an effort to cover up how bad they are for the country.

health care is a case in point. there isnt a single issue in health care thats being framed honestly because of the poisonous influence of free trade deals that its obviously perceived must be covered up because almost nobody in the country would agree with their goals or agenda.

That really needs to be ended.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»On Trade, Angry Voters Ha...