Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Editorials & Other Articles

Paladin

(28,252 posts) Fri Mar 25, 2016, 05:54 PM Mar 2016

1

OK, is today's David Brooks-trashing article in Salon really only 5 fucking paragraphs long?

Does it really end with some lame-ass thoughts about Reaganism being like some sort of clothing con job, perpetrated on the public?

Goddamned advertisement-clogged, barely moving site.......

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

OK, is today's David Brooks-trashing article in Salon really only 5 fucking paragraphs long? (Original Post) Paladin Mar 2016 OP

We are doomed... Kalidurga Mar 2016 #1

Ugh. revbones Mar 2016 #2

Brooks or Brock? SCantiGOP Mar 2016 #3

the rest of it stretched the metaphor Enrique Mar 2016 #4

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)

1. We are doomed...

Reply to Paladin (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2016, 05:56 PM

Mar 2016

Salon was the last publication left that reported the truth.

revbones

(3,660 posts)

2. Ugh.

Reply to Paladin (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2016, 06:16 PM

Mar 2016

I'd like to see Peter Daou get included in some truth about David Brock since Peter is his new henchman.

SCantiGOP

(13,869 posts)

3. Brooks or Brock?

Reply to Paladin (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2016, 07:07 PM

Mar 2016

Enrique

(27,461 posts)

4. the rest of it stretched the metaphor

Reply to Paladin (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2016, 07:30 PM

Mar 2016

by the end it was threadbare.

That said, it was a good article, thanks for the heads up.

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»OK, is today's David Broo...