Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 09:50 AM Jun 2016

Op-Ed What Americans abroad know about Bernie Sanders and you should know too



(snip)

Although countless analyses have been devoted to the demographics each candidate needs to win, one demographic has not been part of the national conversation. Sanders won the first global Democratic Party primary by a landslide — 69% of the vote — that the media hardly noted and never analyzed. Democrats Abroad, the overseas arm of the Democratic Party, organized the election, which took place in March, to represent citizens who live outside the U.S., a group the Democratic National Committee considers the 51st state.

Expatriate Democrats could choose to send primary election absentee ballots back to their home states, or they could participate in the global primary, which will send 21 delegates to the party convention in July. Ballots could be cast by fax, email or snail mail in the global primary, or at one of 104 polling places that were organized in cities from Lima to London. (Since I was traveling at the time, I faxed my ballot, but my daughter sent me a festive photo showing her feeling the Bern in Berlin.)

Of the 8 million Americans who live abroad, 34,700 participated in the global Democratic primary. Although the sampling is not huge, it’s considerably larger than that used for polls that play crucial roles in the electoral process. While we are wondering what drives young Latinas or older white men to support this or that candidate, we ought to consider why 69% of Democratic voters who live in 40 countries preferred Bernie Sanders.

The answer is quite simple: The Sanders proposals that may strike Americans who have never lived in other countries as impractical and outlandish are simply common sense elsewhere — especially in Canada and Western Europe, where the majority of Democrats Abroad voters live. Universal healthcare? The U.S. is the only developed country that lacks it. Family leave? While it is nice that San Francisco just mandated six weeks of paid leave for new parents, Germany mandates 14 months — 16 if both parents share the time spent at home. Free college tuition? Britain recently tripled its college tuition fees, though it’s still the case that a year at Oxford will cost you a fraction of a year at a middling American college. In the rest of Europe, free tuition, and interest-free loans for living expenses, are the rule.


(snip)

But Germany is a model worth emulating: Its economy remains one of the strongest to emerge from the 2008 financial crisis. It has managed to preserve much of its manufacturing base in the process of becoming a dominant player in a globalized world. It is a major industrial exporter. Its success has gone hand in hand with laws and practices that American workers, blue collar or white, would be grateful for.

Real knowledge of daily working life abroad has shown expats that the revolution Sanders proposes for the United States could be just a matter of course. Voters at home should take heed.



http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-neiman-sanders-global-democratic-primary-20160603-snap-story.html

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

malthaussen

(17,187 posts)
1. It's not a random sample, though.
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 10:29 AM
Jun 2016

Americans abroad tend to be better educated, better informed, and more willing to take risks, or they wouldn't be abroad. Whereas in various overseas territories, where the vote is largely indigenous, Mrs Clinton won by landslides, probably due simply to brand recognition.

-- Mal

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
2. Exit polls aren't randomly selected and analyzed by the media.
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 10:36 AM
Jun 2016

They consistently choose voters on the basis of race, gender, income, ideology etc. etc.

Why did better educated, better informed Democratic Voters overseas overwhelmingly vote for Bernie?

The corporate media conglomerates were deafeningly silent on this dynamic.

malthaussen

(17,187 posts)
3. Well, it's a question that answers itself...
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 10:38 AM
Jun 2016

... and the media is silent because they aren't serving the better educated and better informed.

-- Mal

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
4. I don't believe they're serving the less educated and less informed either,
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 10:40 AM
Jun 2016

the corporate media conglomerates prefer an ignorant populace; much easier to manipulate and sell to.

George II

(67,782 posts)
7. I think the point was that "Americans abroad" are not an accurate cross-section of the American...
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 12:38 PM
Jun 2016

....electorate. Nor do they represent all racial, ethnic, religious, sexual-orientation, or economic groups.

The smaller the group, the less representative they are.

bbgrunt

(5,281 posts)
5. Expats are also exposed to a much more diverse media and better understand
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 12:27 PM
Jun 2016

how our choices affect other countries. Candidates who are hawkish and willing to extend our military for regime change elsewhere are seen as pariahs the world over. Regime change, after all, is just another excuse for war and profit.

LittleGirl

(8,282 posts)
6. I was one of those that voted in it
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 12:37 PM
Jun 2016

I lived in a red state (AZ) so I thought I'd make a statement by voting this way for the primary and will be requesting my November voter abroad ballot soon.
Bernie won so much because Democratic Socialism isn't a dirty word here. It actually works! I was actually surprised about the results. I had no idea that he was going to win that by a landslide but early on, we had much better coverage of the primary than the states. We have many choices, Euronews, BBC, etc and CNN is the WORST. It was trump, trump trump everyday! ugh.

Uncle Joe

(58,349 posts)
10. That's one of the major adverse effects from the hubris of "American Exceptionalism" that kind
Fri Jun 3, 2016, 02:46 PM
Jun 2016

soul killing pride prevents too many Americans from believing the U.S. can learn anything from other nations in regards to looking out for, taking care and advancing the cause of its citizens.



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»Op-Ed What Americans abro...