Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:52 PM Jun 2016

In the rural West, residents choose low taxes over law enforcement

https://www.revealnews.org/article/in-the-rural-west-residents-choose-low-taxes-over-law-enforcement/


Josephine isn’t the only county in trouble. The federal government has been helping keep swaths of rural America on economic life support for years. Since 2000, it’s paid billions of dollars to 41 states hit hard by the timber industry’s decline. But that money, which has been decreasing steadily, could dry up soon. And if it does, Daniel and his department will be walloped by the fallout.

A countywide tax levy could help stave off a public safety emergency. But efforts to pass one have gone nowhere, thanks to a right-leaning populace ardently opposed to an increase. In fact, since 2012, a proposed levy has failed four times, most recently in May 2015. This year, it didn’t even make the ballot.

Residents, meanwhile, enjoy the lowest property tax rates of any county in Oregon: 58 cents per $1,000 of assessed value – less than a quarter of the state’s average.



I listened to this Reveal episode while running just now and I am completely infuriated. This is a small county, but the same thing has happened in Kansas, for example. We used to have a social contract: taxes were the price we paid for a civilized society; now we have people hellbent on destroying that. And the Democrats never really make a very good case (or maybe they are too afraid of being voted out) that higher taxes are a good thing. Or at least adequate taxes for funding basic services.


11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In the rural West, residents choose low taxes over law enforcement (Original Post) alarimer Jun 2016 OP
Sadly, in many places people choose low taxes over SheilaT Jun 2016 #1
They seem not to see the connection. alarimer Jun 2016 #4
I guess it depends how rural they are Travis_0004 Jun 2016 #2
I don't know much about this place alarimer Jun 2016 #3
so what will happen greymattermom Jun 2016 #5
In the podcast, they would have to call back in the morning. alarimer Jun 2016 #8
It's the economy... freebrew Jun 2016 #6
No, it has the lowest rates in the state. alarimer Jun 2016 #9
People in such places don't have a lot of cash, and they don't want much "help" either. bemildred Jun 2016 #7
Again, they wallowed at the federal government trough for years. alarimer Jun 2016 #10
So what? How does that make them different from the rest of us living on the tab? bemildred Jun 2016 #11
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
1. Sadly, in many places people choose low taxes over
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:56 PM
Jun 2016

things that are socially good. Schools come to mind.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
4. They seem not to see the connection.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 11:17 PM
Jun 2016

In the podcast, one guy called the police repeatedly about a burglary, yet I'd bet you he voted against the tax levy. These people are so unbelievably selfish.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
2. I guess it depends how rural they are
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 09:03 PM
Jun 2016

No amount of police precence will get a response time less than 30 minutes where I live. Because the station closes overnight, response time may be an hour, but we dont have any crime here anyway. People have guns, they will take care of the issue themselves before calling the police.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
3. I don't know much about this place
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 11:15 PM
Jun 2016

But the report said crime had risen a lot, that criminals waited until after hours to do their crimes when they knew no one would respond.

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
5. so what will happen
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 01:30 PM
Jun 2016

when they call 911? Will every rich person need a body guard? Probably cheaper to pay taxes.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
8. In the podcast, they would have to call back in the morning.
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:08 AM
Jun 2016

Seriously, that was one of the messages given to a guy who called about a robbery. Which was considered a lesser emergency, since it was just stuff. I'm not sure what happens in a true emergency.

Many have decided to take the law into their own hands, with guns.

freebrew

(1,917 posts)
6. It's the economy...
Sun Jun 12, 2016, 04:39 PM
Jun 2016

people's wages are stagnant. They can't afford more taxes.
The cops are going to demand a certain $$ to do the work.

If wages had gone up in relation to costs, we would be in much better shape.
At this point, sales taxes are replacing monies from businesses. Regressive.
Add that to the low wages, rising health coverage costs, fuel.

Is it any wonder? Crime is up, every other cost is up.

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
9. No, it has the lowest rates in the state.
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:13 AM
Jun 2016

Because they lived off the largess of federal taxpayers. Typical selfish conservatives: they take and take and take but never feel any responsibility for things. Now that things are starting to happen to them, maybe they'll change their tune, but I doubt it.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
7. People in such places don't have a lot of cash, and they don't want much "help" either.
Mon Jun 13, 2016, 07:44 AM
Jun 2016

They kind of move there to get away from the help and advice we all get all day long, see?

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
10. Again, they wallowed at the federal government trough for years.
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:17 AM
Jun 2016

They were not "self-sufficient." They pretty much had all the thing normal communities had, but it was paid for, not by them, but by national taxpayers. Which was fine because it was federal policies that caused the loss of jobs (And I mostly agreed that it was necessary to protect these forests), but, instead of taking responsibility, the opted out. Typical selfish conservatives. They are all "self-made" even if they take a SBA loan, or federal contract or some such.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
11. So what? How does that make them different from the rest of us living on the tab?
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 09:52 AM
Jun 2016

Who the fuck else is planning to take responsibility? Are you? What do you plan to take responsiblity for? The deficit? The F-35? Trumps' legal bills?

If these guys are parasites they are the least expensive and demanding in the country.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Editorials & Other Articles»In the rural West, reside...