for info.Eric Cantor: What the Obama Presidency Looked Like to the Opposition

[elleng]

He started with an outstretched hand. Then that changed.

(Sorry, folks. I MAY read this some time, but not right now.)

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/14/opinion/sunday/eric-cantor-what-the-obama-presidency-looked-like-to-the-opposition.html?

[appleannie1943]

1. He started with an outstretched hand and was rebuffed. He invited all to sit and have

snacks with him and discuss things. No one showed up except democrats. What did you want him to do?
Kiss your ass?

[cally]

2. It's not awful. Fairly reasonable for him

[elleng]

3. Reasonable for cantor? Maybe,

but having not read more than early paragraphs, seems he 'forgot' mcconnell's:

[mtngirl47]

4. Revisionist history

We saw the Republicans and Wall Street turn their backs on President Obama time after time.

[shadowmayor]

5. Pure

Cover your ass horseshit pablum from Cantor. They had already decided to cock-block everything and anything the Obama administration presented. These kind of revisionist essays remind me of Newt telling everybody how he helped balance the budget under Clinton.

Cantor can go choke on a dry turd.

[Leith]

6. Self-Serving Claptrap

Cantor whines about being labeled "the party of No" but "forgets" to mention that there was an excellent reason for being called that.